Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData updated noong July 23, 2026

Larne vs Cliftonville: match stats

Larne crest
Larne
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
165%(1.44)
X22%(4.00)
213%(6.00)

Larne ang clear favorite ng match na ito, nasa top ng table with an impressive 22 wins this season. Ang home form nila ay sobrang solid, may 65% win rate sa home games at only 6% losses, backed by five consecutive wins sa kanilang stadium. Si Cliftonville naman, struggling sa away matches, winning only 31% of games with 44% losses at negative goal difference (-4). Larne also dominates offensively, scoring an average of 1.88 goals per home game at only 0.59 conceded, habang si Cliftonville ay conceding 1.44 goals on average sa away. Ang advantage sa possession (56% vs 53%), shot accuracy, at clean sheets sa 59% ng home games ay additional factors na nagpapakita ng sure win for the hosts. Ang recent form ng both teams (Larne: 2.2 pts/game vs Cliftonville: 1.4 pts/game) confirms the clear dominance ng league leader.

Larne vs Cliftonville: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Larne vs Cliftonville sa NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 28 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Larne: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. Cliftonville: 2-0-3 at 1.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

Larne scores 1.92 at concedes 0.68 goals per match. Cliftonville scores 1.44 at concedes 1.56. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Larne 39%, Cliftonville 59%. Over 2.5: Larne 47%, Cliftonville 59%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots at playing style

Larne ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.56 vs 1.41. Larne averages 12.4 shots per match, habang Cliftonville ay 11.8.

First at second half

Larne leads at half-time sa 47% ng matches at scores 1.05 goals after the break. Cliftonville: 28% at 0.79.

Goals by minute

Larne: 76-90+ (20 goals). Cliftonville: 76-90+ (14 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 52% at Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-2-0. Average goals: 1.33, BTTS: 33%.

Match description

Larne ang clear favorite ng match na ito, nasa top ng table with an impressive 22 wins this season. Ang home form nila ay sobrang solid, may 65% win rate sa home games at only 6% losses, backed by five consecutive wins sa kanilang stadium. Si Cliftonville naman, struggling sa away matches, winning only 31% of games with 44% losses at negative goal difference (-4). Larne also dominates offensively, scoring an average of 1.88 goals per home game at only 0.59 conceded, habang si Cliftonville ay conceding 1.44 goals on average sa away. Ang advantage sa possession (56% vs 53%), shot accuracy, at clean sheets sa 59% ng home games ay additional factors na nagpapakita ng sure win for the hosts. Ang recent form ng both teams (Larne: 2.2 pts/game vs Cliftonville: 1.4 pts/game) confirms the clear dominance ng league leader.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
LarneCliftonville
8Shots12
LarneCliftonville
4Shots on target2
LarneCliftonville
1.15xG1.22
LarneCliftonville
7Corners2
LarneCliftonville
50Dangerous attacks45
LarneCliftonville
10Fouls10
LarneCliftonville
0Cards0
LarneCliftonville

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.92Goals scored / match1.44
LarneCliftonville
0.68Goals conceded / match1.56
LarneCliftonville
52%Average possession52%
LarneCliftonville
5.13Shots on target / match4.28
LarneCliftonville

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.39Shots per match11.77
LarneCliftonville
5.13Shots on target4.28
LarneCliftonville
15.5%Shot conversion12.2%
LarneCliftonville
52%Possession52%
LarneCliftonville
1.56xG for1.41
LarneCliftonville
1.1xG against1.46
LarneCliftonville

Shooting quality

Larne: Efficient finishingCliftonville: Balanced
LarneCliftonville
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Larne is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Larne · 1.2 pts / match - Cliftonville

Larne
WLWDW
Season result split
66% W21% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
25-8-5
2.18 pts / match · goal difference +47
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Cliftonville
LLWWL
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-16
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Larne is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Larne · 1.44 goals / match - Cliftonville

Larne is 129% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Larne · 1.56 goals / match - Cliftonville

Scoring profile ng Larne: napakalakas

Larne scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).

Scoring profile ng Cliftonville: mixed

Cliftonville scores in 77% of matches (30 of 39 matches), while Larne keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

73Goals scored (season)56
LarneCliftonville
26Goals conceded (season)61
LarneCliftonville
2.61Average goals in match3
LarneCliftonville
13Goals scored (last 5)7
LarneCliftonville
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
LarneCliftonville

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal77%
LarneCliftonville
63%2 goals41%
LarneCliftonville
21%3 goals15%
LarneCliftonville
13%4 goals5%
LarneCliftonville

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal74%
LarneCliftonville
16%2 goals54%
LarneCliftonville
5%3 goals15%
LarneCliftonville
3%4 goals8%
LarneCliftonville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time26%
LarneCliftonville
5%BTTS in both halves8%
LarneCliftonville
29%Scored in both halves21%
LarneCliftonville

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
LarneCliftonville
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
LarneCliftonville
20%BTTS - last 580%
LarneCliftonville

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
LarneCliftonville
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
LarneCliftonville
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
LarneCliftonville

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
LarneCliftonville
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time49%
LarneCliftonville
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
LarneCliftonville

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Larne is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.82 pts / match - Larne · 1.23 pts / match - Cliftonville

Larne - half-time state
47% leading39% draw13% trailing
Cliftonville - half-time state
28% leading38% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)1.23
LarneCliftonville
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.64
LarneCliftonville
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
LarneCliftonville
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.41
LarneCliftonville
74%Clean sheet before half-time46%
LarneCliftonville
42%No goal before half-time54%
LarneCliftonville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)1.38
LarneCliftonville
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
LarneCliftonville
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
LarneCliftonville
1.37Average goals (2nd half)1.59
LarneCliftonville
74%Clean sheet after half-time46%
LarneCliftonville
45%No goal after half-time49%
LarneCliftonville

Larne - second-half results

53% W29% R18% P
69
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
71
Second-half points
+28
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cliftonville - second-half results

36% W31% R33% P
48
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Larne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Larne
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
12
5
16-30
12
7
31-45
12
7
46-60
8
1
61-75
20
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
7
11
16-30
9
16
31-45
10
8
46-60
7
13
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Larne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

LarneLigaCliftonville
Average goals in match 2.612.94 3.00
Both teams scored 39%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%56% 59%
Clean sheets 55%26% 26%
Goal before half-time 68%76% 74%
Goal after half-time 74%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Larne 1 - 2 - 0 Cliftonville. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% mga match.

Larne FC
0 : 0
Cliftonville FC
Cliftonville FC
0 : 2
Larne FC
Cliftonville FC
1 : 1
Larne FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Larne vs Cliftonville?

Natapos ang NIFL Premiership match sa score na Larne 2:0 Cliftonville. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Larne at Cliftonville?

Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Larne ng 1, ang Cliftonville ng 0, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 1.33; BTTS: 33%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Larne vs Cliftonville?

Larne scores 1.92 goals per match at Cliftonville 1.44. Ang NIFL Premiership average ay 2.94 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Larne 39%, Cliftonville 59%.

Ano ang current form ng Larne at Cliftonville?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Larne ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang Cliftonville ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Larne vs Cliftonville?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.