Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus: match stats
Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus sa J1 League (Japan). Naka-schedule ang match sa 30 November 2025 at 06:00. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Machida Zelvia: 1-2-2 sa last five matches at 1.00 points per match. Nagoya Grampus: 1-1-3 at 0.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Machida Zelvia scores 1.37 at concedes 1.00 goals per match. Nagoya Grampus scores 1.16 at concedes 1.47. League average: 2.40 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Machida Zelvia 42%, Nagoya Grampus 61%. Over 2.5: Machida Zelvia 50%, Nagoya Grampus 61%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots at playing style
Machida Zelvia ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.39 vs 1.28. Machida Zelvia averages 12.2 shots per match, habang Nagoya Grampus ay 11.6.
First at second half
Machida Zelvia leads at half-time sa 39% ng matches at scores 0.71 goals after the break. Nagoya Grampus: 18% at 0.74.
Goals by minute
Machida Zelvia: 76-90+ (14 goals). Nagoya Grampus: 76-90+ (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 47% at Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Machida Zelvia | Nagoya Grampus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Machida Zelvia is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Machida Zelvia · 0.8 pts / match - Nagoya Grampus
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Machida Zelvia is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.37 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.16 goals / match - Nagoya Grampus
Machida Zelvia is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.47 goals / match - Nagoya Grampus
Machida Zelvia scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Nagoya Grampus keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).
Nagoya Grampus scores in 74% of matches (28 of 38 matches), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Machida Zelvia
Over / Under — Nagoya Grampus
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Machida Zelvia is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.66 pts / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.13 pts / match - Nagoya Grampus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Machida Zelvia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nagoya Grampus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Machida Zelvia
Nagoya Grampus
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Machida Zelvia | Liga | Nagoya Grampus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.37 | 2.40 | ▲ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 47% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 31% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 76% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Machida Zelvia 1 - 0 - 0 Nagoya Grampus. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus?
Natapos ang J1 League match sa score na Machida Zelvia 3:1 Nagoya Grampus. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus?
Machida Zelvia scores 1.37 goals per match at Nagoya Grampus 1.16. Ang J1 League average ay 2.40 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 45% ng matches. BTTS: Machida Zelvia 42%, Nagoya Grampus 61%.
Ano ang current form ng Machida Zelvia at Nagoya Grampus?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Machida Zelvia ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match), habang ang Nagoya Grampus ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Machida Zelvia vs Nagoya Grampus?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.