Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData updated noong July 23, 2026

Medeama vs Hohoe United: match stats

Medeama crest
Medeama
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Hohoe United crest
Hohoe United
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Medeama ay nagpapakita ng decisive advantage bilang league leader na may impressive record na 12 wins at 2 losses lang sa season. Sila ay sobrang effective sa home, winning 67% of home matches at maintaining 42% clean sheets, with an average na only 0.58 goals conceded per match. Hohoe United ay nasa 16th place sa table at may very weak away results – only 9% of away matches won, 73% of matches na walang scored goal, at a negative goal difference na -8. Ang xG statistics ay nagpapakita ng advantage ng Medeama (1.95 xG For vs 0.85 xG Against) over Hohoe United (0.74 xG For vs 1.41 xG Against), na nagco-confirm ng qualitative difference between the teams. Despite sa weaker recent form ng Medeama (0.8 points per match sa last 5 matches), ang kanilang dominance sa home matches at clear advantage sa lahat ng key statistics ay definitely nagfa-favor sa victory nila.

Medeama vs Hohoe United: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Medeama vs Hohoe United sa Ghana Premier League (Ghana). Naka-schedule ang match sa 8 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2 sa last five matches at 1.80 points per match. Hohoe United: 0-0-5 at 0.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 at concedes 0.82 goals per match. Hohoe United scores 0.73 at concedes 1.27. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Hohoe United 33%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Hohoe United 33%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots at playing style

Medeama ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.43 vs 1.21. Medeama averages 9.5 shots per match, habang Hohoe United ay 4.8.

First at second half

Medeama leads at half-time sa 38% ng matches at scores 0.76 goals after the break. Hohoe United: 27% at 0.30.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Hohoe United: 16-30 (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34% at Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Medeama ay nagpapakita ng decisive advantage bilang league leader na may impressive record na 12 wins at 2 losses lang sa season. Sila ay sobrang effective sa home, winning 67% of home matches at maintaining 42% clean sheets, with an average na only 0.58 goals conceded per match. Hohoe United ay nasa 16th place sa table at may very weak away results – only 9% of away matches won, 73% of matches na walang scored goal, at a negative goal difference na -8. Ang xG statistics ay nagpapakita ng advantage ng Medeama (1.95 xG For vs 0.85 xG Against) over Hohoe United (0.74 xG For vs 1.41 xG Against), na nagco-confirm ng qualitative difference between the teams. Despite sa weaker recent form ng Medeama (0.8 points per match sa last 5 matches), ang kanilang dominance sa home matches at clear advantage sa lahat ng key statistics ay definitely nagfa-favor sa victory nila.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MedeamaHohoe United
-1Shots-1
MedeamaHohoe United
-1Shots on target-1
MedeamaHohoe United
0xG0
MedeamaHohoe United
-1Corners-1
MedeamaHohoe United
0Dangerous attacks0
MedeamaHohoe United
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaHohoe United
-1Cards-1
MedeamaHohoe United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.53Goals scored / match0.73
MedeamaHohoe United
0.82Goals conceded / match1.27
MedeamaHohoe United
45%Average possession29%
MedeamaHohoe United
3.59Shots on target / match1.37
MedeamaHohoe United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match4.77
MedeamaHohoe United
3.59Shots on target1.37
MedeamaHohoe United
16.1%Shot conversion15.4%
MedeamaHohoe United
45%Possession29%
MedeamaHohoe United
1.43xG for1.21
MedeamaHohoe United
1.07xG against1.47
MedeamaHohoe United

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingHohoe United: Counter-attacking
MedeamaHohoe United
Accuracy (shots on target)38%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.25
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.53

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Hohoe United
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W30% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 110% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 0.73 goals / match - Hohoe United

Medeama is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 1.27 goals / match - Hohoe United

Scoring profile ng Medeama: napakalakas

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Hohoe United keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Scoring profile ng Hohoe United: mas challenging

Hohoe United scores in 43% of matches (13 of 30 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)22
MedeamaHohoe United
28Goals conceded (season)38
MedeamaHohoe United
2.35Average goals in match2
MedeamaHohoe United
11Goals scored (last 5)0
MedeamaHohoe United
8Goals conceded (last 5)13
MedeamaHohoe United

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal43%
MedeamaHohoe United
44%2 goals23%
MedeamaHohoe United
15%3 goals3%
MedeamaHohoe United
9%4 goals3%
MedeamaHohoe United

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal80%
MedeamaHohoe United
21%2 goals33%
MedeamaHohoe United
3%3 goals13%
MedeamaHohoe United
3%4 goals0%
MedeamaHohoe United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time10%
MedeamaHohoe United
3%BTTS in both halves0%
MedeamaHohoe United
26%Scored in both halves7%
MedeamaHohoe United

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
MedeamaHohoe United
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
MedeamaHohoe United
60%BTTS - last 50%
MedeamaHohoe United

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
MedeamaHohoe United
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
MedeamaHohoe United
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
MedeamaHohoe United

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
MedeamaHohoe United
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
MedeamaHohoe United
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
MedeamaHohoe United

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.37 pts / match - Hohoe United

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Hohoe United - half-time state
27% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.37
MedeamaHohoe United
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.43
MedeamaHohoe United
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
MedeamaHohoe United
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.73
MedeamaHohoe United
65%Clean sheet before half-time73%
MedeamaHohoe United
50%No goal before half-time70%
MedeamaHohoe United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)0.83
MedeamaHohoe United
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.3
MedeamaHohoe United
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
MedeamaHohoe United
1.21Average goals (2nd half)0.97
MedeamaHohoe United
68%Clean sheet after half-time47%
MedeamaHohoe United
41%No goal after half-time80%
MedeamaHohoe United

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hohoe United - second-half results

13% W43% R43% P
41
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Hohoe United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Hohoe United
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
7
2
16-30
2
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Hohoe United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaHohoe United
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.00
Both teams scored 53%34% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 33%
Clean sheets 44%41% 20%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 47%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 0 - 1 - 0 Hohoe United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Hohoe United
1 : 1
Medeama

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Medeama vs Hohoe United?

Natapos ang Ghana Premier League match sa score na Medeama 1:2 Hohoe United. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Medeama vs Hohoe United?

Medeama scores 1.53 goals per match at Hohoe United 0.73. Ang Ghana Premier League average ay 2.03 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 34% ng matches. BTTS: Medeama 53%, Hohoe United 33%.

Ano ang current form ng Medeama at Hohoe United?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Medeama ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match), habang ang Hohoe United ay 0-0-5 (0.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Medeama vs Hohoe United?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.