Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData updated noong July 23, 2026

Medeama vs Young Apostles: match stats

Medeama crest
Medeama
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Young Apostles crest
Young Apostles
170%(1.22)
X20%(4.85)
210%(13.20)

Ang Medeama ay may definite advantage bilang table leader na may impressive record na 9 wins, 7 draws, at only 1 loss ngayong season. Ang hosts ay nagpapakita ng excellent home form na may 67% win rate at nagko-concede lamang ng average na 0.56 goal per match sa home. Ang Young Apostles ay nasa 16th place sa table na may very poor away form – only 11% wins sa away games at 67% ng matches ay walang goal. Ang gap sa offensive quality ay malaki: Ang Medeama ay nag-a-average ng 1.56 goals per match sa home na may xG na 2.07, habang ang guests ay nakaka-score lang ng 0.33 goal average sa away games na may xG na 1.29. Ang recent form ay pabor din sa hosts – 2.2 points per match sa huling 5 games kumpara sa 0.8 points lang ng guests. Taking all statistics into account, ang isang decisive victory para sa Medeama ang most likely outcome ng match na ito.

Medeama vs Young Apostles: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Medeama vs Young Apostles sa Ghana Premier League (Ghana). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 January 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2 sa last five matches at 1.80 points per match. Young Apostles: 3-0-2 at 1.80 points per match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 at concedes 0.82 goals per match. Young Apostles scores 1.06 at concedes 1.09. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Young Apostles 39%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Young Apostles 36%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots at playing style

Medeama ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.43 vs 1.38. Medeama averages 9.5 shots per match, habang Young Apostles ay 6.4.

First at second half

Medeama leads at half-time sa 38% ng matches at scores 0.76 goals after the break. Young Apostles: 27% at 0.55.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Young Apostles: 31-45+ (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34% at Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Ang Medeama ay may definite advantage bilang table leader na may impressive record na 9 wins, 7 draws, at only 1 loss ngayong season. Ang hosts ay nagpapakita ng excellent home form na may 67% win rate at nagko-concede lamang ng average na 0.56 goal per match sa home. Ang Young Apostles ay nasa 16th place sa table na may very poor away form – only 11% wins sa away games at 67% ng matches ay walang goal. Ang gap sa offensive quality ay malaki: Ang Medeama ay nag-a-average ng 1.56 goals per match sa home na may xG na 2.07, habang ang guests ay nakaka-score lang ng 0.33 goal average sa away games na may xG na 1.29. Ang recent form ay pabor din sa hosts – 2.2 points per match sa huling 5 games kumpara sa 0.8 points lang ng guests. Taking all statistics into account, ang isang decisive victory para sa Medeama ang most likely outcome ng match na ito.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
MedeamaYoung Apostles
13Shots10
MedeamaYoung Apostles
4Shots on target1
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.49xG1.1
MedeamaYoung Apostles
7Corners2
MedeamaYoung Apostles
53Dangerous attacks55
MedeamaYoung Apostles
20Fouls21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1Cards3
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.53Goals scored / match1.06
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.82Goals conceded / match1.09
MedeamaYoung Apostles
45%Average possession28%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3.59Shots on target / match1.88
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match6.36
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3.59Shots on target1.88
MedeamaYoung Apostles
16.1%Shot conversion16.7%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
45%Possession28%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.43xG for1.38
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.07xG against1.25
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingYoung Apostles: Counter-attacking
MedeamaYoung Apostles
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Young Apostles
LWWLW
Season result split
33% W27% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 1.06 goals / match - Young Apostles

Medeama is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 1.09 goals / match - Young Apostles

Scoring profile ng Medeama: napakalakas

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

Scoring profile ng Young Apostles: mixed

Young Apostles scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)35
MedeamaYoung Apostles
28Goals conceded (season)36
MedeamaYoung Apostles
2.35Average goals in match2.15
MedeamaYoung Apostles
11Goals scored (last 5)8
MedeamaYoung Apostles
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
MedeamaYoung Apostles

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal61%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
44%2 goals30%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
15%3 goals15%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%4 goals0%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal70%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
21%2 goals33%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%3 goals6%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%4 goals0%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
26%Scored in both halves27%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
60%BTTS - last 560%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.21 pts / match - Young Apostles

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Young Apostles - half-time state
27% leading39% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.52
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.03
MedeamaYoung Apostles
65%Clean sheet before half-time58%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
50%No goal before half-time61%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.12
MedeamaYoung Apostles
68%Clean sheet after half-time55%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
41%No goal after half-time52%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Young Apostles - second-half results

24% W48% R27% P
40
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Young Apostles - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Young Apostles
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
8
16-30
9
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Young Apostles

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaYoung Apostles
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.15
Both teams scored 53%34% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 36%
Clean sheets 44%41% 30%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 70%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 1 - 0 - 0 Young Apostles. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Young Apostles
0 : 2
Medeama

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Medeama vs Young Apostles?

Natapos ang Ghana Premier League match sa score na Medeama 3:0 Young Apostles. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Medeama vs Young Apostles?

Medeama scores 1.53 goals per match at Young Apostles 1.06. Ang Ghana Premier League average ay 2.03 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 34% ng matches. BTTS: Medeama 53%, Young Apostles 39%.

Ano ang current form ng Medeama at Young Apostles?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Medeama ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match), habang ang Young Apostles ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Medeama vs Young Apostles?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.