United States - MLSData updated noong July 23, 2026

Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: match stats

Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire sa MLS (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 16 May 2026 at 22:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Montreal Impact: 1-3-1 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2 at 1.80 points per match.

Goal statistics

Montreal Impact scores 1.47 at concedes 2.07 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.93 at concedes 1.27. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montreal Impact 47%, Chicago Fire 60%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 73%, Chicago Fire 73%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots at playing style

Chicago Fire ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.64 vs 1.52. Montreal Impact averages 13.8 shots per match, habang Chicago Fire ay 14.9.

First at second half

Montreal Impact leads at half-time sa 40% ng matches at scores 0.60 goals after the break. Chicago Fire: 40% at 1.13.

Goals by minute

Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). Chicago Fire: 61-75 (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Montreal has home advantage: sa home games nananalo sila ng 60% ng matches at nag-aaverage ng 2.0 goals per match with average xG 1.56, habang si Chicago sa away games averages 1.8 goals with xG 1.35. Home side ng Montreal nagpapalabas ng more shots (14 vs 11.4) at more shots on target (5.6 vs 4.8), at sa last 5 matches Montreal scored 11 goals vs 12 ng Chicago, pero Montreal conceded 5 goals habang Chicago 9. Sa last 5 matches Montreal kumikita ng average 2.0 points per match (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), habang Chicago 1.2 points per match (2 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses) — malinaw na mas maganda ang form ng home team. Defensively Montreal performs better at home: average 1.0 goal conceded per match at average xG against 1.14, vs 1.4 conceded and xG against 1.6 for Chicago away. Zusätzlich (additional), Montreal has 40% clean sheets at home and 0% matches without scoring, while Chicago has 20% clean sheets and 20% away matches without a goal; kaya I favour a Montreal win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
15Shots11
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
5Shots on target4
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.83xG1.16
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
16Corners3
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
74Dangerous attacks24
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
14Fouls13
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4Cards3
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.47Goals scored / match1.93
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
2.07Goals conceded / match1.27
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
49%Average possession53%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4.93Shots on target / match5.13
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.8Shots per match14.87
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4.93Shots on target5.13
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
10.6%Shot conversion13%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
49%Possession53%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.52xG for1.64
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.39xG against1.41
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Montreal Impact: BalancedChicago Fire: Attacking
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact
WDLDD
Season result split
27% W20% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chicago Fire
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.27 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Scoring profile ng Montreal Impact: malakas

Montreal Impact scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng Chicago Fire: napakalakas

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

22Goals scored (season)29
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
31Goals conceded (season)19
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
3.53Average goals in match3.2
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
8Goals scored (last 5)10
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal93%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
40%2 goals60%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
27%3 goals27%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
13%4 goals7%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal60%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
67%2 goals40%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
40%3 goals27%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
20%4 goals0%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
27%Scored in both halves40%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
40%BTTS - last 580%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.67 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact - half-time state
40% leading13% draw47% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.67
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.73Average goals (1st half)1.33
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
40%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
40%No goal before half-time33%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.87
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
67%No goal after half-time33%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Montreal Impact - second-half results

27% W20% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
2
46-60
7
1
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

3.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Montreal ImpactLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 3.533.31 3.20
Both teams scored 47%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 73%
Clean sheets 27%22% 40%
Goal before half-time 87%77% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Montreal Impact 0 - 0 - 1 Chicago Fire. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

Natapos ang MLS match sa score na Montreal Impact 0:2 Chicago Fire. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

Montreal Impact scores 1.47 goals per match at Chicago Fire 1.93. Ang MLS average ay 3.31 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 63% ng matches. BTTS: Montreal Impact 47%, Chicago Fire 60%.

Ano ang current form ng Montreal Impact at Chicago Fire?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Montreal Impact ay 1-3-1 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Chicago Fire ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.