Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam: match stats
Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam sa Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). Naka-schedule ang match sa 2 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Mtibwa Sugar: 0-0-5 sa last five matches at 0.00 points per match. Azam: 4-0-1 at 2.40 points per match.
Goal statistics
Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 at concedes 1.60 goals per match. Azam scores 1.52 at concedes 0.41. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 50%, Azam 17%. Over 2.5: Mtibwa Sugar 53%, Azam 34%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots at playing style
Azam ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.56 vs 1.00. Mtibwa Sugar averages 3.5 shots per match, habang Azam ay 10.2.
First at second half
Mtibwa Sugar leads at half-time sa 7% ng matches at scores 0.43 goals after the break. Azam: 48% at 0.69.
Goals by minute
Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (8 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35% at Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 0%.
Match description
I predict an away win (2). Azam is 4th with a season record of 8 wins, 10 draws and 0 losses, while Mtibwa is 10th with 5 wins, 8 draws and 6 losses. Azam scored 24 and conceded 5 this season, Mtibwa 16 scored and 21 conceded; in the last 5 games Azam has 5 goals for and 1 against, Mtibwa 4–10. The visitors generate more quality chances: avg 8.78 shots and 2.78 on target away with xG 1.31, versus 5.71 shots, 2.29 on target and xG 0.98 for the hosts. Defensively Azam performs better — 0.56 goals conceded away and 56% clean sheets vs 1.1 conceded at home and 30% clean sheets for Mtibwa, which together with the higher avg points in the last 5 matches (1.8 vs 0.4) favors the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mtibwa Sugar | Azam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.29 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.69 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 83% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.52 goals / match - Azam
Azam is 290% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.41 goals / match - Azam
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).
Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mtibwa Sugar
Over / Under — Azam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 178% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.86 pts / match - Azam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Mtibwa Sugar
Azam
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mtibwa Sugar | Liga | Azam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.43 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 39% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 39% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 60% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mtibwa Sugar 0 - 0 - 1 Azam. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam?
Natapos ang Ligi kuu Bara match sa score na Mtibwa Sugar 0:3 Azam. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam?
Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 goals per match at Azam 1.52. Ang Ligi kuu Bara average ay 2.17 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 39% ng matches. BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 50%, Azam 17%.
Ano ang current form ng Mtibwa Sugar at Azam?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Mtibwa Sugar ay 0-0-5 (0.00 points per match), habang ang Azam ay 4-0-1 (2.40 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Mtibwa Sugar vs Azam?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.