Nafta vs Beltinci: match stats
Nafta vs Beltinci: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Nafta vs Beltinci sa 2. SNL (Slovenia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 10 May 2026 at 17:45. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Nafta: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. Beltinci: 3-0-2 at 1.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 2.17 at concedes 0.77 goals per match. Beltinci scores 1.83 at concedes 0.83. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 60%, Beltinci 47%. Over 2.5: Nafta 47%, Beltinci 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots at playing style
Beltinci ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.74 vs 1.60. Nafta averages 12.3 shots per match, habang Beltinci ay 13.4.
First at second half
Nafta leads at half-time sa 57% ng matches at scores 1.23 goals after the break. Beltinci: 50% at 0.97.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). Beltinci: 76-90+ (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50% at Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 5.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Nafta ang favorite: this season they have 22 wins, 5 draws at 0 losses, lider sa table at may 61 goals, at sa last 5 matches nanalo lahat ng 5, scoring 10 goals. Sa home, Nafta averages 2.62 goals at generates 1.73 xG with 5.69 shots on target at conversion 19%, habang Beltinci away averages 1.62 goals per match, xG 1.62 at conversion 13%. Pero solid yung defense ng visitors: Beltinci concedes only 0.46 goals away on average at keeps 69% clean sheets, samantalang Nafta sa home concedes 0.85 goals at has 23% clean sheets. Ibig sabihin, home advantage ng Nafta ay mainly sa offensive efficiency (61 vs 50 goals this season, 2.62 vs 1.62 goals average at 19% vs 13% conversion), pero yung mataas na clean sheet rate ng visitors nagpapababa ng expected margin ng win. Considering Nafta’s unbeaten run at mas mahusay nilang finishing, I project a home win: 60% para sa Nafta, 20% draw at 20% away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Nafta · 1.8 pts / match - Beltinci
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - Nafta · 1.83 goals / match - Beltinci
Nafta is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Nafta · 0.83 goals / match - Beltinci
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
Beltinci scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Nafta
Over / Under — Beltinci
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.03 pts / match - Nafta · 1.8 pts / match - Beltinci
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Beltinci - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Nafta
Beltinci
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.93 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 74% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Beltinci. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Nafta vs Beltinci?
Natapos ang 2. SNL match sa score na Nafta 2:1 Beltinci. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Nafta vs Beltinci?
Nafta scores 2.17 goals per match at Beltinci 1.83. Ang 2. SNL average ay 2.82 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 54% ng matches. BTTS: Nafta 60%, Beltinci 47%.
Ano ang current form ng Nafta at Beltinci?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Nafta ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang Beltinci ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Nafta vs Beltinci?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.