Neom SC vs Al Shabab: match stats
Neom SC vs Al Shabab: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Neom SC vs Al Shabab sa Professional League (Saudi Arabia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 May 2026 at 18:50. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Neom SC: 1-3-1 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Al Shabab: 1-0-4 at 0.60 points per match.
Goal statistics
Neom SC scores 1.26 at concedes 1.41 goals per match. Al Shabab scores 1.29 at concedes 1.68. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Neom SC 65%, Al Shabab 62%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 53%, Al Shabab 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots at playing style
Al Shabab ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.46 vs 1.43. Neom SC averages 13.0 shots per match, habang Al Shabab ay 12.8.
First at second half
Neom SC leads at half-time sa 32% ng matches at scores 0.65 goals after the break. Al Shabab: 12% at 0.76.
Goals by minute
Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). Al Shabab: 46-60 (10 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58% at Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 5.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Neom SC is 8th sa table habang Al Shabab nasa 13th—clear indikasyon ng home advantage. Sa huling 5 matches, Neom: 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss, avg 1.6 points/game at 9 goals; Al Shabab: 0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses, avg 0.6 points/game at 7 goals. Sa home, Neom nag-aaverage ng 4.8 shots on target at 52% possession; Al Shabab as away nag-aaverage ng 3.73 shots on target, 45% possession, 47% draws at fail to score sa 47% ng away matches. xG similar: xG Neom 1.37 vs xG Al Shabab 1.27, pero guests conceded 13 goals sa last 5 vs 8 conceded ng Neom; season totals 52 conceded ng Al Shabab vs 44 ng home team. Avg goals conceded away Al Shabab 1.2 vs Neom home 1.47. Considering higher points/game ng Neom (1.6 vs 0.6), higher shots on target at home and low no-goal rate for hosts (13% vs 47%), predicted outcome: Neom SC win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Neom SC | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Neom SC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Neom SC · 0.6 pts / match - Al Shabab
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Neom SC is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.68 goals / match - Al Shabab
Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
Al Shabab scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Neom SC
Over / Under — Al Shabab
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Neom SC is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Neom SC · 0.79 pts / match - Al Shabab
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Shabab - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Neom SC
Al Shabab
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Neom SC | Liga | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.68 | 3.01 | • 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 23% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 0 - 1 Al Shabab. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
Natapos ang Professional League match sa score na Neom SC 2:1 Al Shabab. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
Neom SC scores 1.26 goals per match at Al Shabab 1.29. Ang Professional League average ay 3.01 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Neom SC 65%, Al Shabab 62%.
Ano ang current form ng Neom SC at Al Shabab?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Neom SC ay 1-3-1 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Al Shabab ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.