England - Premier LeagueData updated noong July 22, 2026

Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match stats

155%(1.72)
X28%(3.90)
217%(4.85)

Nagpapakita ng malinaw na advantage ang Nottingham Forest over Wolverhampton Wanderers sa labang ito. May record ang hosts na 25% wins sa home matches, habang ang guests ay hindi pa nananalo sa away games ngayong season (0% Win%). Ang Wolverhampton ay may catastrophic goal difference sa away na -15 goals at naga-average lang ng 0.42 goals per match, na walang naitatalang clean sheet kahit isa. Ang Forest ay may mas magandang xG (1.57 vs 1.01) at mas mataas na shot accuracy, na nag-susuggest ng mas mataas na quality ng created chances. Ang form ng parehong teams sa last five matches ay magkahawig, pero ang home advantage at mas malinaw na offensive at defensive stats ng hosts ay pabor sa kanilang panalo.

Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers sa Premier League (England). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Nottingham Forest: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 0-3-2 at 0.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Nottingham Forest scores 1.26 at concedes 1.34 goals per match. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.71 at concedes 1.79. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nottingham Forest 47%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%. Over 2.5: Nottingham Forest 53%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots at playing style

Nottingham Forest ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.44 vs 1.13. Nottingham Forest averages 12.5 shots per match, habang Wolverhampton Wanderers ay 9.7.

First at second half

Nottingham Forest leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.76 goals after the break. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 8% at 0.37.

Goals by minute

Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (13 goals). Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Premier League: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Nagpapakita ng malinaw na advantage ang Nottingham Forest over Wolverhampton Wanderers sa labang ito. May record ang hosts na 25% wins sa home matches, habang ang guests ay hindi pa nananalo sa away games ngayong season (0% Win%). Ang Wolverhampton ay may catastrophic goal difference sa away na -15 goals at naga-average lang ng 0.42 goals per match, na walang naitatalang clean sheet kahit isa. Ang Forest ay may mas magandang xG (1.57 vs 1.01) at mas mataas na shot accuracy, na nag-susuggest ng mas mataas na quality ng created chances. Ang form ng parehong teams sa last five matches ay magkahawig, pero ang home advantage at mas malinaw na offensive at defensive stats ng hosts ay pabor sa kanilang panalo.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
35Shots7
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
10Shots on target3
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
3.49xG0.81
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
8Corners2
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
84Dangerous attacks21
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
12Fouls13
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0Cards2
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.26Goals scored / match0.71
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.34Goals conceded / match1.79
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
47%Average possession43%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
4.11Shots on target / match3.24
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.53Shots per match9.74
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
4.11Shots on target3.24
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
10.1%Shot conversion7.3%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
47%Possession43%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.44xG for1.13
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.52xG against1.63
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Shooting quality

Nottingham Forest: BalancedWolverhampton Wanderers: Balanced
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nottingham Forest is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.6 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Nottingham Forest
WWDLD
Season result split
29% W29% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-11-16
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-7
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 2.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Wolverhampton Wanderers
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W29% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-11-24
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-6-13
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nottingham Forest is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.71 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Nottingham Forest is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - Nottingham Forest · 1.79 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Scoring profile ng Nottingham Forest: napakalakas

Nottingham Forest scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 38 matches).

Scoring profile ng Wolverhampton Wanderers: malakas

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)27
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
51Goals conceded (season)68
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
2.61Average goals in match2.5
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
12Goals scored (last 5)3
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal50%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
34%2 goals18%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
21%3 goals3%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
5%4 goals0%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal89%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
39%2 goals53%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
18%3 goals29%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0%4 goals8%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Nottingham Forest - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 38 matches
45%
Wolverhampton Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 38 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time18%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
18%Scored in both halves5%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
80%BTTS - last 560%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nottingham Forest is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Nottingham Forest - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing
Wolverhampton Wanderers - half-time state
8% leading45% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.68
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.24
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
47%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
66%No goal before half-time74%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
53%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers
53%No goal after half-time71%
Nottingham ForestWolverhampton Wanderers

Nottingham Forest - second-half results

32% W37% R32% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results

21% W29% R50% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nottingham Forest - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7
Wolverhampton Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nottingham Forest
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
9
12
31-45
10
9
46-60
6
3
61-75
13
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Wolverhampton Wanderers
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
3
10
16-30
7
15
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nottingham Forest

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Nottingham ForestLigaWolverhampton Wanderers
Average goals in match 2.612.75 2.50
Both teams scored 47%56% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%55% 45%
Clean sheets 24%26% 11%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 66%
Goal after half-time 74%79% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nottingham Forest 1 - 0 - 0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Natapos ang Premier League match sa score na Nottingham Forest 0:0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Nottingham Forest scores 1.26 goals per match at Wolverhampton Wanderers 0.71. Ang Premier League average ay 2.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Nottingham Forest 47%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%.

Ano ang current form ng Nottingham Forest at Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Nottingham Forest ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Wolverhampton Wanderers ay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.