Lithuania - A LygaData updated noong July 23, 2026

Panevėžys vs Trakai: match stats

Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Trakai crest
Trakai
165%(1.40)
X25%(4.20)
210%(6.60)

Ang Panevėžys ay nagpapakita ng definitely better disposition sa kanilang home matches, kung saan hindi pa sila natatalo ng kahit isang laro this season, achieving a 100% draw rate at nag-maintain ng clean sheet sa half ng matches nila. Ang Trakai naman ay nasa terrible away form – natalo sila sa lahat ng 4 away matches nila, walang nakuhang kahit isang point, naka-score ng 0 goals sa away games, at nag-aaverage ng 4 goals conceded per match. Ang xG stats ay strongly in favor din sa hosts (1.43 vs 0.78 para sa visitors), at ang chance conversion pati na ang average shots on target ay clearly pabor sa Panevėžys. Kahit hindi pa nananalo ang hosts this season, ang solid performance nila sa home against sa completely helpless na away form ng Trakai ay nagbibigay sa kanila ng real chance to break through at kunin ang 3 points. Ang goal difference ng visitors (-8 sa away) at 100% loss rate sa away matches ay nagme-make sa kanila na very weak opponent sa matchup na ito.

Panevėžys vs Trakai: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Panevėžys vs Trakai sa A Lyga (Lithuania). Naka-schedule ang match sa 15 March 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Panevėžys: 1-1-3 sa last five matches at 0.80 points per match. Trakai: 0-0-5 at 0.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 0.95 at concedes 1.81 goals per match. Trakai scores 0.31 at concedes 2.63. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 57%, Trakai 25%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 62%, Trakai 63%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots at playing style

Panevėžys ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.26 vs 1.01. Panevėžys averages 11.0 shots per match, habang Trakai ay 8.4.

First at second half

Panevėžys leads at half-time sa 33% ng matches at scores 0.38 goals after the break. Trakai: 6% at 0.13.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). Trakai: 0-15 (2 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Sa 4 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-2. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 50%.

Match description

Ang Panevėžys ay nagpapakita ng definitely better disposition sa kanilang home matches, kung saan hindi pa sila natatalo ng kahit isang laro this season, achieving a 100% draw rate at nag-maintain ng clean sheet sa half ng matches nila. Ang Trakai naman ay nasa terrible away form – natalo sila sa lahat ng 4 away matches nila, walang nakuhang kahit isang point, naka-score ng 0 goals sa away games, at nag-aaverage ng 4 goals conceded per match. Ang xG stats ay strongly in favor din sa hosts (1.43 vs 0.78 para sa visitors), at ang chance conversion pati na ang average shots on target ay clearly pabor sa Panevėžys. Kahit hindi pa nananalo ang hosts this season, ang solid performance nila sa home against sa completely helpless na away form ng Trakai ay nagbibigay sa kanila ng real chance to break through at kunin ang 3 points. Ang goal difference ng visitors (-8 sa away) at 100% loss rate sa away matches ay nagme-make sa kanila na very weak opponent sa matchup na ito.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
PanevėžysTrakai
14Shots7
PanevėžysTrakai
5Shots on target2
PanevėžysTrakai
1.78xG1.03
PanevėžysTrakai
9Corners3
PanevėžysTrakai
75Dangerous attacks62
PanevėžysTrakai
11Fouls10
PanevėžysTrakai
6Cards3
PanevėžysTrakai

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.95Goals scored / match0.31
PanevėžysTrakai
1.81Goals conceded / match2.63
PanevėžysTrakai
47%Average possession45%
PanevėžysTrakai
3.76Shots on target / match2.31
PanevėžysTrakai

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match8.38
PanevėžysTrakai
3.76Shots on target2.31
PanevėžysTrakai
8.7%Shot conversion3.7%
PanevėžysTrakai
47%Possession45%
PanevėžysTrakai
1.26xG for1.01
PanevėžysTrakai
1.64xG against1.88
PanevėžysTrakai

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedTrakai: Balanced
PanevėžysTrakai
Accuracy (shots on target)34%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.13

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Trakai
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W19% R81% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-13
0.19 pts / match · goal difference -37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-8
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Panevėžys is 206% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.31 goals / match - Trakai

Panevėžys is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys · 2.63 goals / match - Trakai

Scoring profile ng Panevėžys: napakalakas

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Trakai keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Scoring profile ng Trakai: mixed

Trakai scores in 25% of matches (4 of 16 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

20Goals scored (season)5
PanevėžysTrakai
38Goals conceded (season)42
PanevėžysTrakai
2.76Average goals in match2.94
PanevėžysTrakai
5Goals scored (last 5)2
PanevėžysTrakai
11Goals conceded (last 5)13
PanevėžysTrakai

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal25%
PanevėžysTrakai
24%2 goals6%
PanevėžysTrakai
5%3 goals0%
PanevėžysTrakai
0%4 goals0%
PanevėžysTrakai

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal88%
PanevėžysTrakai
48%2 goals75%
PanevėžysTrakai
33%3 goals50%
PanevėžysTrakai
14%4 goals31%
PanevėžysTrakai

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time13%
PanevėžysTrakai
10%BTTS in both halves0%
PanevėžysTrakai
10%Scored in both halves0%
PanevėžysTrakai

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
PanevėžysTrakai
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS44%
PanevėžysTrakai
60%BTTS - last 520%
PanevėžysTrakai

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
PanevėžysTrakai
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
PanevėžysTrakai
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
PanevėžysTrakai

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
PanevėžysTrakai
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
PanevėžysTrakai
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
PanevėžysTrakai

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 148% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Panevėžys · 0.5 pts / match - Trakai

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing
Trakai - half-time state
6% leading31% draw63% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)0.5
PanevėžysTrakai
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.19
PanevėžysTrakai
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)1.31
PanevėžysTrakai
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.5
PanevėžysTrakai
38%Clean sheet before half-time31%
PanevėžysTrakai
57%No goal before half-time81%
PanevėžysTrakai

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)0.44
PanevėžysTrakai
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.13
PanevėžysTrakai
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
PanevėžysTrakai
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.44
PanevėžysTrakai
43%Clean sheet after half-time31%
PanevėžysTrakai
67%No goal after half-time94%
PanevėžysTrakai

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Trakai - second-half results

6% W25% R69% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Trakai - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-8-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Trakai
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
10
16-30
0
7
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -14 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Trakai

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
27%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaTrakai
Average goals in match 2.762.62 2.94
Both teams scored 57%49% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%55% 63%
Clean sheets 14%32% 13%
Goal before half-time 81%69% 75%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Panevėžys 2 - 0 - 2 Trakai. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% mga match.

FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FK Trakai
FK Trakai
1 : 3
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
3 : 0
FK Trakai
FK Trakai
3 : 1
FK Panevėžys

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Panevėžys vs Trakai?

Natapos ang A Lyga match sa score na Panevėžys 2:1 Trakai. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Panevėžys at Trakai?

Sa huling 4 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Panevėžys ng 2, ang Trakai ng 2, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.00; BTTS: 50%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Panevėžys vs Trakai?

Panevėžys scores 0.95 goals per match at Trakai 0.31. Ang A Lyga average ay 2.62 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Panevėžys 57%, Trakai 25%.

Ano ang current form ng Panevėžys at Trakai?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Panevėžys ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match), habang ang Trakai ay 0-0-5 (0.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Panevėžys vs Trakai?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.