Pars Jam Bushehr vs Damash Gilanian: mga stats ng match
Pars Jam Bushehr vs Damash Gilanian: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Naglaro ang Pars Jam Bushehr laban sa Damash Gilanian sa Azadegan League (Iran). Nilaro ang match noong 11 July 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 4:0.
Current na form
Pars Jam Bushehr: 3-2-0 sa last five matches at 2.20 points per match. Damash Gilanian: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.
Stats ng goals
Pars Jam Bushehr ay may 1.19 goals na na-score at 0.66 na na-concede bawat match. Ang Damash Gilanian naman ay may 0.50 na na-score at 1.63 na na-concede. Average ng liga: 1.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pars Jam Bushehr 38%, Damash Gilanian 44%. Over 2.5: Pars Jam Bushehr 28%, Damash Gilanian 31%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots at style ng laro
Pars Jam Bushehr ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 0.93 vs 0.82. May average na 0.7 shots bawat match ang Pars Jam Bushehr, habang 1.7 naman ang Damash Gilanian.
First at second half
Nangunguna ang Pars Jam Bushehr sa half-time sa 38% ng matches at nakaka-score ng 0.63 goals pagkatapos ng break. Para sa Damash Gilanian, 3% at 0.31 ang mga value.
Goals ayon sa minuto
Pars Jam Bushehr: 16-30 (8 goals). Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
Context ng liga
Azadegan League: 1.56 goals per match, BTTS 30% at Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head record
Bago ang match na ito, may 1 previous head-to-head matches sa database. Ang record ay 1-0-0, average goals 1.00, at BTTS 0%.
Archived na pre-match analysis
Ginawa ang analysis na ito bago ang kick-off. Ang conclusions ay base lang sa data na available bago ang match at hindi kasama ang final result o post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pars Jam Bushehr (3rd sa table) may clear advantage: sa season naka-record sila ng 14 wins, 12 draws at 6 losses with goal difference 38–21, habang si Damash (18th) may 2 wins, 12 draws at 18 losses at goal tally 16–52. Home form ng Pars Jam: avg 1.06 goals scored at only 0.56 conceded per match, +8 home goal difference at 63% clean sheets; away si Damash: avg 0.47 goals for at 1.73 conceded with -19 goal difference at only 20% clean sheets. Form confirms home superiority: Pars Jam sa last 5 matches scored 8 goals, won 3 at drew 2 (avg 2.2 points per game), samantalang Damash sa last 5 scored 3, no wins at conceded 14 goals (avg 0.4 points). Quality of chances for the visitors is low — away xG for Damash 0.85 vs xG against 1.48 and only avg 6 shots with 3 on target per match, nagpapakita ng struggles to create high-quality chances. Considering the gap in goal output (38 vs 16), much better home defence of Pars Jam (0.56 vs 1.73 conceded per match) and Damash’s lack of away wins (0% away wins), I forecast a home victory.
Tingnan ang statistical overviewAyon sa half
Stats ng match
Pre-match na profile— ano ang sinasabi ng season numbers?
Team profile ito batay sa season data at form. Lalabas lang ang match-flow statistics kapag tapos na ang fixture.
Stats ng teams— alin ang mas efficient na team?
Comparison ng attack at defence ng dalawang teams sa current season.
Quality ng shooting
| Pars Jam Bushehr | Damash Gilanian | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy ng shots on target | 29% | 23% |
| Quality ng chances (xG bawat shot) | 1.41 | 0.49 |
| Finishing (goals bawat shot on target) | 6.26 | 1.32 |
Kapag nasa 0.08 ang xG per shot, kadalasan long-range attempts iyon; ang 0.15+ ay karaniwang chances sa box. Galing sa possession, shot volume at conversion ang style label.
* Ipinapakita ng xG (expected goals) kung ilang goals ang inaasahang makuha ng team mula sa chances nito. Kapag mas mataas ang actual goals kaysa xG, above average ang finishing; kapag mas mababa, may missed chances.
Form ng teams— alin ang mas maganda ang current form?
Last five matches at season record, overall at may home-away split.
Pars Jam Bushehr ang 450% better sa: form sa last 5 matches.
2.2 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.4 pts / match - Damash Gilanian
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
Ilang goals ang sini-score at kino-concede ng dalawang teams, pati kung gaano kadalas silang mag-clean sheet o hindi maka-score.
Pars Jam Bushehr ang 138% better sa: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.5 goals / match - Damash Gilanian
Pars Jam Bushehr ang 147% better sa: goals conceded per match.
0.66 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 1.63 goals / match - Damash Gilanian
Nakaka-score ang Pars Jam Bushehr sa 72% ng matches (23 sa 32 matches), habang may clean sheet ang Damash Gilanian sa 19% (6 sa 32 matches).
Nakaka-score ang Damash Gilanian sa 47% ng matches (15 sa 32 matches), habang may clean sheet ang Pars Jam Bushehr sa 50% (16 sa 32 matches).
Gaano kadalas silang maka-score ng hindi bababa sa...
Gaano kadalas silang mag-concede ng hindi bababa sa...
* Kasama sa statistics ang home at away matches ng dalawang teams sa current season.
Parehong teams naka-score (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
Gaano kadalas may goals ang magkabilang panig sa matches ng teams, kumpara sa league average.
Mga pattern ng goal
BTTS at goal count
Mga goal line (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
Gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal thresholds ang matches ng teams, sa full match at bawat half.
Buong match - comparison ng teams (Over)
Over / Under - Pars Jam Bushehr
Over / Under - Damash Gilanian
1st half
2nd half
Mga half ng match— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
Paano nahahati sa first at second half ang performance: goals, points, clean sheets at state sa half-time.
Pars Jam Bushehr ang 130% better sa: form sa first half (half-time points).
1.59 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.69 pts / match - Damash Gilanian
Bago ang half-time (1st half)
Pagkatapos ng half-time (2nd half)
Pars Jam Bushehr - mga result sa second half
Leading sa half-time sa 38% ng matches at nananalo sa 44%. Nanalo rin sa ilang matches kahit walang half-time lead.
Stable ang defence sa buong match.
Damash Gilanian - mga result sa second half
Leading sa half-time sa 3% ng matches at nananalo sa 6%. Nanalo rin sa ilang matches kahit walang half-time lead.
Nagko-concede ng 0.4 more goals per match pagkatapos ng half-time - bumababa ang defensive level sa second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points bawat match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals na na-score / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals na na-concede / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average ng goals sa match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points bawat match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals na na-score / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals na na-concede / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average ng goals sa match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -8 |
* Ipinapakita ng colors sa tables ang event frequency: green ay common, yellow ay moderate, red ay rare. Frequency ito, hindi team rating.
Goals ayon sa minuto— kailan dumarating ang goals?
Mga phase ng match kung kailan pinakamadalas maka-score at mag-concede ang dalawang teams.
Pinaka-dangerous sa minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Pinakamaraming conceded sa 76-90 (5). Balance ng late goals (76-90): +2 - malakas sa late phases.
Pinaka-dangerous sa minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Pinakamaraming conceded sa 76-90 (15). Balance ng late goals (76-90): -7 - mahina sa late phases.
* Kasama sa buckets na 31-45 at 76-90 ang added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa completed matches ngayong season.
Profile ng match
Pars Jam Bushehr
Damash Gilanian
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick. Ang iba pang indicators ay naglalarawan ng completed matches sa season.
Context ng liga— mataas ba ang scoring sa league na ito?
Paano nagko-compare ang dalawang teams sa league-wide averages ng Azadegan League.
Teams kumpara sa liga
| Pars Jam Bushehr | Liga | Damash Gilanian | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average ng goals sa match | ▲ 1.84 | 1.56 | ▲ 2.13 |
| Parehong teams naka-score | ▲ 38% | 30% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 28% | 21% | ▲ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal bago ang half-time | ▲ 59% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal pagkatapos ng half-time | ▲ 59% | 57% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = mas mataas sa league average, ˇ red = mas mababa sa league average. Direction ng gap ang ipinapakita nito, hindi team rating.
Lineups at player events
Verified starters, substitutes at recorded events para sa match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Timeline ng match
Mga goal, card at substitution ayon sa pagkakasunod ng oras.
- Pars Jam BushehrGoalHossein Pouramini
Head-to-head
Nakaraang meeting: Pars Jam Bushehr 1 - 0 - 0 Damash Gilanian. Average ng goals 1.00, both teams scored sa 0% matches.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Pars Jam Bushehr vs Damash Gilanian?
Natapos ang Azadegan League match sa score na Pars Jam Bushehr 4:0 Damash Gilanian. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Pars Jam Bushehr vs Damash Gilanian?
Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.19 goals per match at Damash Gilanian 0.50. Ang Azadegan League average ay 1.56 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 21% ng matches. BTTS: Pars Jam Bushehr 38%, Damash Gilanian 44%.
Ano ang current form ng Pars Jam Bushehr at Damash Gilanian?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Pars Jam Bushehr ay 3-2-0 (2.20 points per match), habang ang Damash Gilanian ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Pars Jam Bushehr vs Damash Gilanian?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.