France - Ligue 2Data updated noong July 23, 2026

Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38: match stats

Pau crest
Pau
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Grenoble Foot 38 crest
Grenoble Foot 38
150%(1.97)
X28%(3.40)
222%(3.70)

Slight favorite ang Pau sa game na ito, kahit medyo questionable ang recent form nila. Lamang ang hosts sa xG stats sa home court (1.52 vs 1.01), na nagpapakita ng better quality sa chances created. Ang Grenoble Foot 38 ay wala pang clean sheet sa away games this season at nag-a-allow ng average na 1.67 goals on the road; combined with a 67% away loss rate, weak talaga sila as visitors. Pwede i-capitalize ng Pau ang possession advantage (52% vs 45%) at better xG efficiency, though kailangan nila i-improve ang run nila (1 win in last 5 matches). Considering ang lahat ng factors, lalo na ang poor away form ng Grenoble, may real chance ang hosts for the three points, pero possible pa rin ang draw dahil unstable ang form ng both teams.

Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38 sa Ligue 2 (France). Naka-schedule ang match sa 23 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pau: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Grenoble Foot 38: 2-2-1 at 1.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Pau scores 1.41 at concedes 1.82 goals per match. Grenoble Foot 38 scores 0.97 at concedes 1.15. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pau 56%, Grenoble Foot 38 56%. Over 2.5: Pau 68%, Grenoble Foot 38 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots at playing style

Pau ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.35 vs 1.19. Pau averages 12.2 shots per match, habang Grenoble Foot 38 ay 10.0.

First at second half

Pau leads at half-time sa 35% ng matches at scores 0.59 goals after the break. Grenoble Foot 38: 26% at 0.53.

Goals by minute

Pau: 16-30 (10 goals). Grenoble Foot 38: 76-90+ (14 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52% at Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Slight favorite ang Pau sa game na ito, kahit medyo questionable ang recent form nila. Lamang ang hosts sa xG stats sa home court (1.52 vs 1.01), na nagpapakita ng better quality sa chances created. Ang Grenoble Foot 38 ay wala pang clean sheet sa away games this season at nag-a-allow ng average na 1.67 goals on the road; combined with a 67% away loss rate, weak talaga sila as visitors. Pwede i-capitalize ng Pau ang possession advantage (52% vs 45%) at better xG efficiency, though kailangan nila i-improve ang run nila (1 win in last 5 matches). Considering ang lahat ng factors, lalo na ang poor away form ng Grenoble, may real chance ang hosts for the three points, pero possible pa rin ang draw dahil unstable ang form ng both teams.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
PauGrenoble Foot 38
19Shots12
PauGrenoble Foot 38
5Shots on target5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
2xG1.36
PauGrenoble Foot 38
9Corners5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
62Dangerous attacks34
PauGrenoble Foot 38
13Fouls11
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1Cards2
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.41Goals scored / match0.97
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.82Goals conceded / match1.15
PauGrenoble Foot 38
52%Average possession44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.88Shots on target / match3.59
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match10.03
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.88Shots on target3.59
PauGrenoble Foot 38
11.6%Shot conversion9.7%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
52%Possession44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.35xG for1.19
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.25xG against1.57
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Shooting quality

Pau: BalancedGrenoble Foot 38: Balanced
PauGrenoble Foot 38
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grenoble Foot 38 is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pau · 1.6 pts / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Pau
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Grenoble Foot 38
DLDWW
Season result split
24% W44% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-11
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pau is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - Pau · 0.97 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Grenoble Foot 38 is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Pau · 1.15 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Scoring profile ng Pau: napakalakas

Pau scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Scoring profile ng Grenoble Foot 38: malakas

Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

48Goals scored (season)33
PauGrenoble Foot 38
62Goals conceded (season)39
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.24Average goals in match2.12
PauGrenoble Foot 38
8Goals scored (last 5)5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
14Goals conceded (last 5)4
PauGrenoble Foot 38

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
41%2 goals21%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
18%3 goals6%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0%4 goals3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
53%2 goals32%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
32%3 goals12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
15%4 goals0%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Grenoble Foot 38 - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 34 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
9%BTTS in both halves3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
24%Scored in both halves12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
80%BTTS - last 560%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
32%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pau - half-time state
35% leading26% draw38% trailing
Grenoble Foot 38 - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.32
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.44
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.97Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.79Average goals (1st half)0.76
PauGrenoble Foot 38
47%Clean sheet before half-time68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
44%No goal before half-time68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.06
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.35
PauGrenoble Foot 38
47%Clean sheet after half-time44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
50%No goal after half-time53%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Pau - second-half results

24% W35% R41% P
45
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results

21% W44% R35% P
45
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Grenoble Foot 38 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pau
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
10
12
16-30
10
11
31-45
7
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
10
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Grenoble Foot 38
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
14
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Grenoble Foot 38

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

PauLigaGrenoble Foot 38
Average goals in match 3.242.53 2.12
Both teams scored 56%52% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%47% 38%
Clean sheets 29%30% 29%
Goal before half-time 85%67% 53%
Goal after half-time 76%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pau 0 - 1 - 0 Grenoble Foot 38. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Grenoble Foot 38
1 : 1
Pau FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

Natapos ang Ligue 2 match sa score na Pau 2:2 Grenoble Foot 38. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

Pau scores 1.41 goals per match at Grenoble Foot 38 0.97. Ang Ligue 2 average ay 2.53 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 47% ng matches. BTTS: Pau 56%, Grenoble Foot 38 56%.

Ano ang current form ng Pau at Grenoble Foot 38?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Pau ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Grenoble Foot 38 ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.