Raufoss vs Kongsvinger: match stats
Raufoss vs Kongsvinger: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Raufoss vs Kongsvinger sa First Division (Norway). Naka-schedule ang match sa 13 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Raufoss: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1 at 2.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Raufoss scores 1.21 at concedes 2.21 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 at concedes 1.50. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Raufoss 57%, Kongsvinger 79%. Over 2.5: Raufoss 71%, Kongsvinger 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots at playing style
Kongsvinger ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.77 vs 1.18. Raufoss averages 10.4 shots per match, habang Kongsvinger ay 14.7.
First at second half
Raufoss leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.64 goals after the break. Kongsvinger: 43% at 1.50.
Goals by minute
Raufoss: 31-45+ (5 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60% at Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-2-0. Average goals: 4.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Pipiliin ko ang away win para sa away team (Kongsvinger). Kongsvinger ay naka-rank #4 kumpara sa #10 ng home side at nag-aaverage ng 1.4 points per game sa last 5 matches, samantalang ang Raufoss ay nasa 0.8 points per game. Sa attack Kongsvinger scored 8 goals sa last 5 matches (avg 1.6 per game) vs 6 goals ng hosts (1.2 per game), at sa defense guests conceded 7 goals (1.4 per game) kumpara sa 10 conceded ng Raufoss (2.0 per game). Goal difference at slightly better win record sa last 5 (2 wins for Kongsvinger vs 1 for Raufoss) ay pabor sa away side, kaya binibigay ko highest chance sa guests.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Raufoss | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Raufoss · 2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 112% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Raufoss · 2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.21 goals / match - Raufoss · 1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Raufoss scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Raufoss keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Raufoss
Over / Under — Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Raufoss · 1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raufoss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Raufoss
Kongsvinger
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Raufoss | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.43 | 3.75 | ▲ 4.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Raufoss 0 - 2 - 0 Kongsvinger. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
Natapos ang First Division match sa score na Raufoss 1:3 Kongsvinger. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Raufoss at Kongsvinger?
Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Raufoss ng 0, ang Kongsvinger ng 0, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 4.00; BTTS: 100%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
Raufoss scores 1.21 goals per match at Kongsvinger 2.57. Ang First Division average ay 3.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 73% ng matches. BTTS: Raufoss 57%, Kongsvinger 79%.
Ano ang current form ng Raufoss at Kongsvinger?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Raufoss ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Kongsvinger ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.