RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen sa First Division B (Belgium). Naka-schedule ang match sa 5 December 2025 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

RFC Seraing: 1-3-1 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. AS Eupen: 2-2-1 at 1.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

RFC Seraing scores 1.16 at concedes 1.38 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.38 at concedes 1.13. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RFC Seraing 50%, AS Eupen 53%. Over 2.5: RFC Seraing 50%, AS Eupen 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots at playing style

RFC Seraing ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.37 vs 1.21. RFC Seraing averages 11.8 shots per match, habang AS Eupen ay 10.5.

First at second half

RFC Seraing leads at half-time sa 13% ng matches at scores 0.81 goals after the break. AS Eupen: 38% at 0.66.

Goals by minute

RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (10 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55% at Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 0.00, BTTS: 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9Shots9
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3Shots on target4
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.07xG1.08
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Corners1
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
40Dangerous attacks30
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
16Fouls13
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
2Cards3
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.16Goals scored / match1.38
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.38Goals conceded / match1.13
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Average possession52%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Shots on target / match3.81
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match10.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Shots on target3.81
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9.8%Shot conversion13.1%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Possession52%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.37xG for1.21
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.48xG against1.61
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Shooting quality

RFC Seraing: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen

RFC Seraing
DDWDL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen

Scoring profile ng RFC Seraing: malakas

RFC Seraing scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

Scoring profile ng AS Eupen: napakalakas

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

37Goals scored (season)44
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
44Goals conceded (season)36
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
2.53Average goals in match2.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
6Goals scored (last 5)6
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal84%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
31%2 goals38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
13%3 goals13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
6%4 goals3%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal63%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
47%2 goals38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
13%3 goals13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3%4 goals0%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3%BTTS in both halves6%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
19%Scored in both halves16%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
60%BTTS - last 540%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen

RFC Seraing - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.72
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.25
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
72%No goal before half-time50%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.44
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
56%Clean sheet after half-time59%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
44%No goal after half-time50%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

RFC Seraing - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RFC SeraingLigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 2.532.84 2.50
Both teams scored 50%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 47%
Clean sheets 28%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 56%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RFC Seraing 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

Natapos ang First Division B match sa score na RFC Seraing 0:1 AS Eupen. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

RFC Seraing scores 1.16 goals per match at AS Eupen 1.38. Ang First Division B average ay 2.84 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 54% ng matches. BTTS: RFC Seraing 50%, AS Eupen 53%.

Ano ang current form ng RFC Seraing at AS Eupen?

Sa last 5 matches, ang RFC Seraing ay 1-3-1 (1.20 points per match), habang ang AS Eupen ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.