Latvia - VirsligaData updated noong July 22, 2026

Riga vs BFC Daugavpils: match stats

Riga crest
Riga
4 : 2half-time 2:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
155%(1.22)
X30%(6.00)
215%(8.00)

Riga parang may advantage sa match na ito, kahit na walang team ang may impressive na form recently. Ang hosts sa last five games ay nakascore ng 7 goals at na-concede ng 8, giving them a slight offensive edge over BFC Daugavpils (4 goals scored, 8 conceded). Key factor ay ang point advantage ng Riga sa last five matches (1.0 PPG compared sa 0.4 PPG ng visitors), na nag su-suggest ng mas magandang form. Ang BFC Daugavpils ay hindi nanalo sa kanilang last five matches, with a three-game losing streak, na nag i-indicate ng serious form issues. Considering home advantage at mas okay na konting form, si Riga may real chance para manalo, pero poor efficiency ng both teams ang nagpapa-possible din na mag-draw.

Riga vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Riga vs BFC Daugavpils sa Virsliga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 14 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

Riga: 4-1-0 sa last five matches at 2.60 points per match. BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1 at 2.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 2.96 at concedes 0.87 goals per match. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 at concedes 1.26. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 57%, BFC Daugavpils 57%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, BFC Daugavpils 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots at playing style

Riga ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 2.03 vs 1.54. Riga averages 17.1 shots per match, habang BFC Daugavpils ay 12.7.

First at second half

Riga leads at half-time sa 70% ng matches at scores 1.43 goals after the break. BFC Daugavpils: 26% at 0.87.

Goals by minute

Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Sa 6 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 3-2-1. Average goals: 1.83, BTTS: 50%.

Match description

Riga parang may advantage sa match na ito, kahit na walang team ang may impressive na form recently. Ang hosts sa last five games ay nakascore ng 7 goals at na-concede ng 8, giving them a slight offensive edge over BFC Daugavpils (4 goals scored, 8 conceded). Key factor ay ang point advantage ng Riga sa last five matches (1.0 PPG compared sa 0.4 PPG ng visitors), na nag su-suggest ng mas magandang form. Ang BFC Daugavpils ay hindi nanalo sa kanilang last five matches, with a three-game losing streak, na nag i-indicate ng serious form issues. Considering home advantage at mas okay na konting form, si Riga may real chance para manalo, pero poor efficiency ng both teams ang nagpapa-possible din na mag-draw.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
RigaBFC Daugavpils
15Shots8
RigaBFC Daugavpils
7Shots on target3
RigaBFC Daugavpils
1.95xG0.93
RigaBFC Daugavpils
8Corners5
RigaBFC Daugavpils
71Dangerous attacks29
RigaBFC Daugavpils
13Fouls13
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0Cards2
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.96Goals scored / match1.26
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0.87Goals conceded / match1.26
RigaBFC Daugavpils
63%Average possession47%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
6.43Shots on target / match4.78
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.13Shots per match12.74
RigaBFC Daugavpils
6.43Shots on target4.78
RigaBFC Daugavpils
17.3%Shot conversion9.9%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
63%Possession47%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
2.03xG for1.54
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0.94xG against1.61
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
RigaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Riga · 2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
78% W17% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-1
2.52 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.07Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
BFC Daugavpils
WDLWW
Season result split
35% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 135% better for: goals scored per match.

2.96 goals / match - Riga · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

Riga is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

Scoring profile ng Riga: napakalakas

Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

Scoring profile ng BFC Daugavpils: malakas

BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).

68Goals scored (season)29
RigaBFC Daugavpils
20Goals conceded (season)29
RigaBFC Daugavpils
3.83Average goals in match2.52
RigaBFC Daugavpils
12Goals scored (last 5)9
RigaBFC Daugavpils
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
RigaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal74%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
87%2 goals30%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
65%3 goals17%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
30%4 goals4%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal74%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
22%2 goals26%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
9%3 goals17%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0%4 goals9%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time4%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
9%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
61%Scored in both halves22%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
20%BTTS - last 540%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

Riga - half-time state
70% leading13% draw17% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.22Points per match (1st half)1.3
RigaBFC Daugavpils
1.52Goals scored (1st half)0.39
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
RigaBFC Daugavpils
2Average goals (1st half)0.7
RigaBFC Daugavpils
61%Clean sheet before half-time74%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
22%No goal before half-time70%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per match (2nd half)1.13
RigaBFC Daugavpils
1.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
RigaBFC Daugavpils
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
RigaBFC Daugavpils
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.83
RigaBFC Daugavpils
70%Clean sheet after half-time30%
RigaBFC Daugavpils
22%No goal after half-time35%
RigaBFC Daugavpils

Riga - second-half results

65% W26% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+24
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W48% R30% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
4
31-45
9
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
13
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals in match 3.832.98 2.52
Both teams scored 57%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%55% 43%
Clean sheets 43%24% 26%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 52%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Riga 3 - 2 - 1 BFC Daugavpils. Average goals 1.83, both teams scored in 50% mga match.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 0
Riga
BFC Daugavpils
1 : 3
Riga
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
1 : 2
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?

Natapos ang Virsliga match sa score na Riga 4:2 BFC Daugavpils. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Riga at BFC Daugavpils?

Sa huling 6 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Riga ng 3, ang BFC Daugavpils ng 1, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 1.83; BTTS: 50%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?

Riga scores 2.96 goals per match at BFC Daugavpils 1.26. Ang Virsliga average ay 2.98 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Riga 57%, BFC Daugavpils 57%.

Ano ang current form ng Riga at BFC Daugavpils?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Riga ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match), habang ang BFC Daugavpils ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.