Riga vs FS Jelgava: match stats
Riga vs FS Jelgava: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Riga vs FS Jelgava sa Virsliga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 16 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Riga: 4-1-0 sa last five matches at 2.60 points per match. FS Jelgava: 3-0-2 at 1.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Riga scores 2.96 at concedes 0.87 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 1.04 at concedes 1.70. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Riga 57%, FS Jelgava 43%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, FS Jelgava 39%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots at playing style
Riga ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 2.03 vs 1.30. Riga averages 17.1 shots per match, habang FS Jelgava ay 10.6.
First at second half
Riga leads at half-time sa 70% ng matches at scores 1.43 goals after the break. FS Jelgava: 39% at 0.43.
Goals by minute
Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Sa 6 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 5-1-0. Average goals: 3.83, BTTS: 33%.
Match description
I predict home win (1). Riga has a huge offensive edge at home — average 3.2 goals per game, xG 2.23, 6.4 shots on target per match and 17% conversion with 64% possession. In the last 5 matches Riga scored 15 goals and averaged 2.6 points per game, while FS Jelgava scored 4 goals and has 1.4 points per game in the same period. Defensively the hosts also look stronger: opponents generate on average 0.76 xG against Riga at their ground, whereas Jelgava away concedes 1.61 xG and lets in 1.33 goals per match on average. Additionally, Riga hasn’t kept a clean sheet at home (0% matches without a goal) and has 80% home win rate, while Jelgava wins only 17% of away games and fail to score in 50% of away matches; so I assess probabilities as 75% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 10% for the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 44% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 185% better for: goals scored per match.
2.96 goals / match - Riga · 1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava
Riga is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava
Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Riga
Over / Under — FS Jelgava
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Riga
FS Jelgava
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.83 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 56% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 55% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 24% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Riga 5 - 1 - 0 FS Jelgava. Average goals 3.83, both teams scored in 33% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Riga vs FS Jelgava?
Natapos ang Virsliga match sa score na Riga 2:2 FS Jelgava. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Riga at FS Jelgava?
Sa huling 6 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Riga ng 5, ang FS Jelgava ng 0, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 3.83; BTTS: 33%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Riga vs FS Jelgava?
Riga scores 2.96 goals per match at FS Jelgava 1.04. Ang Virsliga average ay 2.98 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Riga 57%, FS Jelgava 43%.
Ano ang current form ng Riga at FS Jelgava?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Riga ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match), habang ang FS Jelgava ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Riga vs FS Jelgava?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.