Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: match stats
Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II sa 1. Liga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 5 July 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Rīgas FS II: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. Super Nova II: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS II scores 1.23 at concedes 2.08 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.54 at concedes 1.46. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS II 54%, Super Nova II 69%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 69%, Super Nova II 46%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots at playing style
Rīgas FS II ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.37 vs 1.19. Rīgas FS II averages 8.9 shots per match, habang Super Nova II ay 7.9.
First at second half
Rīgas FS II leads at half-time sa 38% ng matches at scores 0.54 goals after the break. Super Nova II: 38% at 0.85.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60% at Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
Wala pang sapat na head-to-head sample para gawing pangunahing comparison.
Match description
Bet ko sa away win ng visitors. Super Nova II is 6th kontra Rīgas FS II na 10th at season-wise naka-score ng 18 goals vs 15 ng hosts, with away goals average 1.75 vs hosts 1.57. Sa last five matches, visitors average 2.0 points per game at naka-score ng 9 goals, habang hosts average 1.8 pts per game at naka-score ng 10 goals; pero hosts concede sa home average 2.43 goals vs visitors concede away 2.25. Advantage ng Super Nova backed by more shots on target (5.25 vs 4.17), higher average shots (11 vs 9.67) at higher xG 1.48 vs 1.38, plus visitors walang away game na goalless (0% such matches) vs hosts may 14% home matches na walang goal. Kahit na overall average total goals ng parehong teams is 4.0, quality ng chances at consistency sa finishing nag-tilt ng slight advantage to the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS II is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 1 pts / match - Super Nova II
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Super Nova II is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.54 goals / match - Super Nova II
Super Nova II is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.08 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.46 goals / match - Super Nova II
Rīgas FS II scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Super Nova II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rīgas FS II
Over / Under — Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS II
Super Nova II
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.31 | 3.43 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 60% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 69% | 68% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
Natapos ang 1. Liga match sa score na Rīgas FS II 1:1 Super Nova II. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
Rīgas FS II scores 1.23 goals per match at Super Nova II 1.54. Ang 1. Liga average ay 3.43 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 68% ng matches. BTTS: Rīgas FS II 54%, Super Nova II 69%.
Ano ang current form ng Rīgas FS II at Super Nova II?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Rīgas FS II ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang Super Nova II ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.