Sabah vs Zira: match stats
Sabah vs Zira: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Sabah vs Zira sa Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Sabah: 3-0-2 sa last five matches at 1.80 points per match. Zira: 2-2-1 at 1.60 points per match.
Goal statistics
Sabah scores 2.27 at concedes 0.76 goals per match. Zira scores 1.30 at concedes 1.09. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sabah 52%, Zira 58%. Over 2.5: Sabah 61%, Zira 42%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots at playing style
Sabah ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.90 vs 1.38. Sabah averages 14.2 shots per match, habang Zira ay 10.6.
First at second half
Sabah leads at half-time sa 52% ng matches at scores 1.18 goals after the break. Zira: 33% at 0.73.
Goals by minute
Sabah: 46-60 (17 goals). Zira: 76-90+ (15 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Premyer Liqası: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 46% at Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-0. Average goals: 3.50, BTTS: 50%.
Match description
Sabah ang clear favorite: sa home avg nila 2.31 goals per match at xG 2.06, samantalang Zira away avg 1.25 goals at xG 1.29. Attack ng Sabah naka-form — 21 goals sa last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw) kumpara sa 7 goals ng Zira (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss); PPG sa last 5 is 2.6 para sa Sabah vs 1.6 para sa Zira. Defensively stronger ang hosts: Sabah concedes 0.54 goals per match at home at may 46% clean sheets, habang Zira concedes 1.17 away at may 33% clean sheets. Sabah rin nagge-generate ng more chances (15.23 shots at 5.77 on target with 59% possession) vs Zira (10.08 shots, 3.75 on target, 55% possession), at conversion rate 15% vs 12% nagpapalakas sa home advantage. Given table advantage (Sabah 1., Zira 4.), 20 wins ng Sabah vs 11 ng Zira at goal difference sa home +23 kontra +1 sa away ng Zira, nire-rate ko win para sa home team.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sabah | Zira | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sabah is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Sabah · 1.6 pts / match - Zira
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sabah is 75% better for: goals scored per match.
2.27 goals / match - Sabah · 1.3 goals / match - Zira
Sabah is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - Sabah · 1.09 goals / match - Zira
Sabah scores in 88% of matches (29 of 33 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
Zira scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 42% (14 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sabah
Over / Under — Zira
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sabah is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.97 pts / match - Sabah · 1.39 pts / match - Zira
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sabah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Zira - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Sabah
Zira
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).
Teams vs league
| Sabah | Liga | Zira | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.03 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 48% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 31% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sabah 2 - 0 - 0 Zira. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Sabah vs Zira?
Natapos ang Premyer Liqası match sa score na Sabah 2:2 Zira. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Sabah at Zira?
Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Sabah ng 2, ang Zira ng 0, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.50; BTTS: 50%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Sabah vs Zira?
Sabah scores 2.27 goals per match at Zira 1.30. Ang Premyer Liqası average ay 2.58 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 48% ng matches. BTTS: Sabah 52%, Zira 58%.
Ano ang current form ng Sabah at Zira?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Sabah ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match), habang ang Zira ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Sabah vs Zira?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.