Timog Korea - K League 1Data updated noong July 23, 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan: match stats

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Ulsan crest
Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan sa K League 1 (Timog Korea). Naka-schedule ang match sa 5 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2 sa last five matches at 0.60 points per match. Ulsan: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 at concedes 1.37 goals per match. Ulsan scores 1.42 at concedes 1.47. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Ulsan 68%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Ulsan 58%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots at playing style

Ulsan ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.78 vs 1.45. Sangju Sangmu averages 11.9 shots per match, habang Ulsan ay 15.3.

First at second half

Sangju Sangmu leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.58 goals after the break. Ulsan: 32% at 0.79.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Ulsan: 76-90+ (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51% at Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Sa 4 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-1-1. Average goals: 2.50, BTTS: 25%.

Match description

I predict a draw as the safest outcome: Sangju at home has yet to win (0% wins) and 80% ng kanilang home matches end in draws. Ulsan has a clear season advantage in offense (17 goals this season vs 12 for the hosts, average 1.4 goals per away match vs 0.8 for the home side) and better shooting efficiency (9% vs 6%) and more shots on target (5.2 vs 4.6). Despite that, Ulsan is in poorer recent form — only 4 points in the last 5 matches (avg 0.8 pts per match) and 11 goals conceded in that span — while Sangju has 2 wins in the last 5 and averages 1.6 pts per match. xG metrics are similar (xG for: 1.72 home vs 1.81 away; xG against: 1.32 vs 1.51), and the hosts dominate possession (57% vs 52%), which suggests game control but low finishing by Sangju and no clean sheets for them (0%). For these reasons I back a low-scoring game with high likelihood of a point split, but with a real chance of an Ulsan win due to better efficiency.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
Sangju SangmuUlsan
12Shots10
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3Shots on target3
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.56xG1.16
Sangju SangmuUlsan
7Corners3
Sangju SangmuUlsan
81Dangerous attacks44
Sangju SangmuUlsan
13Fouls10
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1Cards0
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.95Goals scored / match1.42
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.37Goals conceded / match1.47
Sangju SangmuUlsan
57%Average possession47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3.53Shots on target / match5.11
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.95Shots per match15.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3.53Shots on target5.11
Sangju SangmuUlsan
7.9%Shot conversion9.3%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
57%Possession47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.45xG for1.78
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.34xG against1.6
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedUlsan: Attacking
Sangju SangmuUlsan
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sangju Sangmu is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.4 pts / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Ulsan
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W21% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.42 goals / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.47 goals / match - Ulsan

Scoring profile ng Sangju Sangmu: napakalakas

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Scoring profile ng Ulsan: napakalakas

Ulsan scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)27
Sangju SangmuUlsan
26Goals conceded (season)28
Sangju SangmuUlsan
2.32Average goals in match2.89
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Sangju SangmuUlsan
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Sangju SangmuUlsan

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal79%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
16%2 goals42%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
5%3 goals11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%4 goals5%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%2 goals37%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%3 goals16%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%4 goals11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Scored in both halves32%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulsan is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.26 pts / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Ulsan - half-time state
32% leading32% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.47
Sangju SangmuUlsan
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
63%No goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.42
Sangju SangmuUlsan
32%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
53%No goal after half-time37%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ulsan - second-half results

26% W47% R26% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ulsan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaUlsan
Average goals in match 2.322.31 2.89
Both teams scored 68%51% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 58%
Clean sheets 11%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 79%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 1 - 1 Ulsan. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 25% mga match.

Ulsan
0 : 0
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
3 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 2
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

Natapos ang K League 1 match sa score na Sangju Sangmu 1:2 Ulsan. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Sangju Sangmu at Ulsan?

Sa huling 4 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Sangju Sangmu ng 2, ang Ulsan ng 1, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 2.50; BTTS: 25%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 goals per match at Ulsan 1.42. Ang K League 1 average ay 2.31 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 39% ng matches. BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Ulsan 68%.

Ano ang current form ng Sangju Sangmu at Ulsan?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Sangju Sangmu ay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per match), habang ang Ulsan ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.