Simba vs JKT Tanzania: match stats
Simba vs JKT Tanzania: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Simba vs JKT Tanzania sa Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). Naka-schedule ang match sa 6 May 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Simba: 5-0-0 sa last five matches at 3.00 points per match. JKT Tanzania: 1-1-3 at 0.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Simba scores 1.79 at concedes 0.38 goals per match. JKT Tanzania scores 1.00 at concedes 1.10. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Simba 28%, JKT Tanzania 43%. Over 2.5: Simba 48%, JKT Tanzania 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots at playing style
Simba ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.57 vs 1.18. Simba averages 8.7 shots per match, habang JKT Tanzania ay 6.5.
First at second half
Simba leads at half-time sa 59% ng matches at scores 0.79 goals after the break. JKT Tanzania: 13% at 0.63.
Goals by minute
Simba: 31-45+ (13 goals). JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (10 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35% at Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Simba ang clear favorite dito: naka-2nd sila sa table, sa home win rate nila 67% at average 2.11 goals scored habang only 0.56 conceded per match. Sa home matches kanilang xG is 1.73 vs opponents' xG 0.86, average 4.75 shots on target per game at conversion rate 18%, na nagta-translate sa 67% clean sheets. JKT Tanzania nasa 5th place, away average nila 1.1 goals scored at 1.4 conceded, xG 1.21 vs xG against 1.3 at sa last 5 games conceded sila ng 11 goals kumpara sa 3 conceded ng Simba. Away kayo, mga guests only 3 shots on target per game, 12% conversion at 30% ng matches walang goal, which limits kanilang comeback capability sa away. Considering higher home xG (1.73 vs 1.21), better scoring efficiency (2.11 vs 1.1 G per game) and Simba’s defensive edge (0.56 conceded vs 1.4), forecast ko home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Simba is 275% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Simba · 0.8 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Simba · 1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
Simba is 189% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.38 goals / match - Simba · 1.1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
Simba scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
JKT Tanzania scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 69% (20 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Simba
Over / Under — JKT Tanzania
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 124% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.17 pts / match - Simba · 0.97 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 72%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Simba
JKT Tanzania
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.17 | 2.17 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 35% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 39% | • 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Simba 1 - 0 - 0 JKT Tanzania. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Natapos ang Ligi kuu Bara match sa score na Simba 1:0 JKT Tanzania. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Simba scores 1.79 goals per match at JKT Tanzania 1.00. Ang Ligi kuu Bara average ay 2.17 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 39% ng matches. BTTS: Simba 28%, JKT Tanzania 43%.
Ano ang current form ng Simba at JKT Tanzania?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Simba ay 5-0-0 (3.00 points per match), habang ang JKT Tanzania ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.