Skalica vs Ružomberok: match stats
Skalica vs Ružomberok: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Skalica vs Ružomberok sa Super Liga (Slovakia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 16 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Skalica: 4-0-1 sa last five matches at 2.40 points per match. Ružomberok: 2-1-2 at 1.40 points per match.
Goal statistics
Skalica scores 1.06 at concedes 1.41 goals per match. Ružomberok scores 1.06 at concedes 1.56. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Skalica 47%, Ružomberok 53%. Over 2.5: Skalica 44%, Ružomberok 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots at playing style
Skalica ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.29 vs 1.25. Skalica averages 11.5 shots per match, habang Ružomberok ay 10.7.
First at second half
Skalica leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.69 goals after the break. Ružomberok: 19% at 0.47.
Goals by minute
Skalica: 61-75 (10 goals). Ružomberok: 0-15 (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 53% at Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-2-0. Average goals: 1.33, BTTS: 33%.
Match description
Skalica sa home average 1.27 goals scored and concedes 1.07 per match; sa last 5 fixtures may 3 wins, 1 draw at 1 loss, scoring 9 goals at averaging 2.0 points per game. Ružomberok, kahit nasa 7th place sa table, away only scores 1.07 goals pero concedes as much as 2.00 goals per match, may -14 goal difference on the road at 53% losses away. Pagdating sa shot quality, Skalica averages 11.47 shots with 3.67 on target at home, habang ang visitors record 9.93 attempts at 3.27 on target away; dagdag pa, Skalica fails to score in just 33% ng home games kumpara sa 40% no-goal rate ni Ružomberok away. xG analysis confirms home advantage: Skalica generates 1.33 xG at home, habang Ružomberok allows 1.92 xG away, which points to more clear-cut chances against the visitors' defence.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Skalica | Ružomberok | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Skalica is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Skalica · 1.4 pts / match - Ružomberok
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skalica is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Skalica · 1.56 goals / match - Ružomberok
Skalica scores in 59% of matches (19 of 32 matches), while Ružomberok keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).
Ružomberok scores in 63% of matches (20 of 32 matches), while Skalica keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Skalica
Over / Under — Ružomberok
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Skalica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ružomberok - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Skalica
Ružomberok
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Skalica | Liga | Ružomberok | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 53% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 27% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 66% | 74% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Skalica 1 - 2 - 0 Ružomberok. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Skalica vs Ružomberok?
Natapos ang Super Liga match sa score na Skalica 1:0 Ružomberok. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Skalica at Ružomberok?
Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Skalica ng 1, ang Ružomberok ng 0, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 1.33; BTTS: 33%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Skalica vs Ružomberok?
Skalica scores 1.06 goals per match at Ružomberok 1.06. Ang Super Liga average ay 2.82 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 57% ng matches. BTTS: Skalica 47%, Ružomberok 53%.
Ano ang current form ng Skalica at Ružomberok?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Skalica ay 4-0-1 (2.40 points per match), habang ang Ružomberok ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Skalica vs Ružomberok?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.