Latvia - 1. LigaData updated noong July 23, 2026

Skanste vs Riga FC II: match stats

Skanste crest
Skanste
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II

Skanste vs Riga FC II: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Skanste vs Riga FC II sa 1. Liga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 4 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Skanste: 1-0-4 sa last five matches at 0.60 points per match. Riga FC II: 4-0-1 at 2.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Skanste scores 1.54 at concedes 2.08 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.62 at concedes 1.77. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Skanste 46%, Riga FC II 62%. Over 2.5: Skanste 69%, Riga FC II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots at playing style

Skanste ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.44 vs 1.36. Skanste averages 9.8 shots per match, habang Riga FC II ay 8.2.

First at second half

Skanste leads at half-time sa 8% ng matches at scores 0.92 goals after the break. Riga FC II: 38% at 0.69.

Goals by minute

Skanste: 46-60 (8 goals). Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60% at Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-0. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Skanste may clear advantage sa chance creation: at home nag-a-average sila ng 11.5 shots at 2.5 on target per match with average xG 1.37, habang si Riga FC II away averages only 6 shots at xG 0.90. Guests are however efficient — conversion ng kanilang shots is 17% vs 9% ng hosts at may 3.5 on-target shots per match, pero yung efficiency na ito comes from fewer overall chances. Defensively, Skanste concedes on average 1.5 goals at home, habang Riga concedes 2.0 goals away; average xG against is 1.44 for Skanste and 2.04 for Riga, na nagpapakita ng higher susceptibility ng guests. Sa last 5 matches, hosts scored 8 goals with 1 win (form llwdl, avg 0.8 points per match), at guests scored 9 goals with 2 wins (llwdw, avg 1.4 points per match); both teams conceded 10 goals in that period. Considering higher chance creation, superior xG at home, at the fact na Skanste had no clean sheets at home (0% such matches) versus Riga having 50% away matches without scoring, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SkansteRiga FC II
11Shots10
SkansteRiga FC II
5Shots on target4
SkansteRiga FC II
1.38xG1.46
SkansteRiga FC II
5Corners12
SkansteRiga FC II
47Dangerous attacks74
SkansteRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
SkansteRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
SkansteRiga FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.54Goals scored / match1.62
SkansteRiga FC II
2.08Goals conceded / match1.77
SkansteRiga FC II
40%Average possession45%
SkansteRiga FC II
4.31Shots on target / match4.62
SkansteRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.85Shots per match8.23
SkansteRiga FC II
4.31Shots on target4.62
SkansteRiga FC II
15.6%Shot conversion19.6%
SkansteRiga FC II
40%Possession45%
SkansteRiga FC II
1.44xG for1.36
SkansteRiga FC II
1.73xG against1.68
SkansteRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Skanste: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
SkansteRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Skanste · 2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II

Skanste
LWLLL
Season result split
31% W8% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Skanste · 1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II

Riga FC II is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.08 goals / match - Skanste · 1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II

Scoring profile ng Skanste: napakalakas

Skanste scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Scoring profile ng Riga FC II: napakalakas

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)21
SkansteRiga FC II
27Goals conceded (season)23
SkansteRiga FC II
3.62Average goals in match3.38
SkansteRiga FC II
5Goals scored (last 5)10
SkansteRiga FC II
13Goals conceded (last 5)4
SkansteRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal77%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%2 goals62%
SkansteRiga FC II
23%3 goals15%
SkansteRiga FC II
23%4 goals8%
SkansteRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
SkansteRiga FC II
69%2 goals62%
SkansteRiga FC II
38%3 goals23%
SkansteRiga FC II
15%4 goals8%
SkansteRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time38%
SkansteRiga FC II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SkansteRiga FC II
8%Scored in both halves38%
SkansteRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
SkansteRiga FC II
40%BTTS - last 560%
SkansteRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
SkansteRiga FC II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
SkansteRiga FC II
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
SkansteRiga FC II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
SkansteRiga FC II

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 185% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Skanste · 1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II

Skanste - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)1.54
SkansteRiga FC II
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.92
SkansteRiga FC II
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
SkansteRiga FC II
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.54
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Clean sheet before half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
85%No goal before half-time38%
SkansteRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.15
SkansteRiga FC II
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SkansteRiga FC II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
SkansteRiga FC II
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1.85
SkansteRiga FC II
46%Clean sheet after half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
54%No goal after half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II

Skanste - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
8
31-45
8
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SkansteLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match 3.623.43 3.38
Both teams scored 46%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Skanste 2 - 0 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Skanstes SK
1 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
0 : 1
Skanstes SK

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Skanste vs Riga FC II?

Natapos ang 1. Liga match sa score na Skanste 2:0 Riga FC II. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Skanste at Riga FC II?

Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Skanste ng 2, ang Riga FC II ng 0, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 1.00; BTTS: 0%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Skanste vs Riga FC II?

Skanste scores 1.54 goals per match at Riga FC II 1.62. Ang 1. Liga average ay 3.43 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 68% ng matches. BTTS: Skanste 46%, Riga FC II 62%.

Ano ang current form ng Skanste at Riga FC II?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Skanste ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match), habang ang Riga FC II ay 4-0-1 (2.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Skanste vs Riga FC II?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.