Sogndal vs Egersund: match stats
Sogndal vs Egersund: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Sogndal vs Egersund sa First Division (Norway). Naka-schedule ang match sa 27 June 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Fosshaugane Campus. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Sogndal: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Egersund: 2-0-3 at 1.20 points per match.
Goal statistics
Sogndal scores 1.79 at concedes 2.57 goals per match. Egersund scores 1.71 at concedes 1.79. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sogndal 64%, Egersund 50%. Over 2.5: Sogndal 86%, Egersund 79%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots at playing style
Sogndal ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.77 vs 1.41. Sogndal averages 15.4 shots per match, habang Egersund ay 11.4.
First at second half
Sogndal leads at half-time sa 36% ng matches at scores 0.86 goals after the break. Egersund: 43% at 0.79.
Goals by minute
Sogndal: 16-30 (6 goals). Egersund: 31-45+ (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60% at Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-1. Average goals: 1.50, BTTS: 0%.
Match description
Bet ko sa Sogndal win. Sogndal sa home averages 17.2 shots per match, kasama 7 on target, xG 2.01 at scores 2.2 goals per game, habang Egersund away records 10.2 shots, 4.2 on target, xG 1.33 at 1.6 goals. Egersund has higher possession (57% vs 43%) at better shooting accuracy (16% vs 13%), pero nagge-generate sila ng fewer chances, kaya favored ang home team. Parehong teams vulnerable defensively: Sogndal concedes 2.0 goals at home with xG against 2.43; Egersund concedes 2.4 away with xG against 1.48, at sa last 5 matches pareho silang nakatanggap ng 13 goals. Given Sogndal’s higher shot volume and xG plus Egersund’s poor away form (1 win, 4 losses), I assign 60% chance sa home win, 25% draw at 15% away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sogndal | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogndal is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Sogndal · 1.71 goals / match - Egersund
Egersund is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.57 goals / match - Sogndal · 1.79 goals / match - Egersund
Sogndal scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Egersund scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sogndal
Over / Under — Egersund
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Sogndal · 1.5 pts / match - Egersund
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogndal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Sogndal
Egersund
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sogndal | Liga | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.36 | 3.75 | ▼ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sogndal 1 - 0 - 1 Egersund. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Sogndal vs Egersund?
Natapos ang First Division match sa score na Sogndal 4:2 Egersund. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Sogndal at Egersund?
Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Sogndal ng 1, ang Egersund ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 1.50; BTTS: 0%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Sogndal vs Egersund?
Sogndal scores 1.79 goals per match at Egersund 1.71. Ang First Division average ay 3.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 73% ng matches. BTTS: Sogndal 64%, Egersund 50%.
Ano ang current form ng Sogndal at Egersund?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Sogndal ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Egersund ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Sogndal vs Egersund?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.