Egypt - Second DivisionData updated noong July 23, 2026

Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: match stats

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Abu Qair Semad crest
Abu Qair Semad
125%(3.30)
X30%(2.65)
245%(2.37)

Nasa 3rd place ang Abu Qair Semad at nagpapakita ng significantly better form kaysa sa Tanta SC (15th position). Ang guests ay may impressive record na 50% wins sa away games at positive goal difference (+4), habang ang hosts ay nanalo lang sa 11% ng home matches with a negative balance na -3. Ang Abu Qair Semad ay nag-a-average ng 4.63 Shots on Target per away match with 16% conversion, na twice as good kumpara sa Tanta SC (2.71 Shots on Target, 8% conversion). Ang hosts ay hindi maka-score sa 33% ng home matches, na naglalagay sa kanila sa disadvantage given the solid defense ng guests (average 1 conceded goal away, 30% clean sheets). Ang xG stats ay pabor din sa Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their quality advantage. Considering all factors, ang guests ang clear favorite sa match na ito.

Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad sa Second Division (Egypt). Naka-schedule ang match sa 22 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Tanta SC: 1-3-1 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Abu Qair Semad: 2-3-0 at 1.80 points per match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 0.79 at concedes 1.06 goals per match. Abu Qair Semad scores 1.18 at concedes 0.74. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 53%, Abu Qair Semad 41%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 24%, Abu Qair Semad 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots at playing style

Abu Qair Semad ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.59 vs 1.26. Tanta SC averages 7.3 shots per match, habang Abu Qair Semad ay 9.6.

First at second half

Tanta SC leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.35 goals after the break. Abu Qair Semad: 29% at 0.59.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41% at Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Nasa 3rd place ang Abu Qair Semad at nagpapakita ng significantly better form kaysa sa Tanta SC (15th position). Ang guests ay may impressive record na 50% wins sa away games at positive goal difference (+4), habang ang hosts ay nanalo lang sa 11% ng home matches with a negative balance na -3. Ang Abu Qair Semad ay nag-a-average ng 4.63 Shots on Target per away match with 16% conversion, na twice as good kumpara sa Tanta SC (2.71 Shots on Target, 8% conversion). Ang hosts ay hindi maka-score sa 33% ng home matches, na naglalagay sa kanila sa disadvantage given the solid defense ng guests (average 1 conceded goal away, 30% clean sheets). Ang xG stats ay pabor din sa Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their quality advantage. Considering all factors, ang guests ang clear favorite sa match na ito.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
12Shots6
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
7Shots on target3
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1.93xG0.92
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3Corners0
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
94Dangerous attacks44
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
12Fouls14
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0Cards0
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.79Goals scored / match1.18
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1.06Goals conceded / match0.74
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
46%Average possession44%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3Shots on target / match4.24
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.32Shots per match9.62
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3Shots on target4.24
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
10.8%Shot conversion12.2%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
46%Possession44%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1.26xG for1.59
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1.26xG against1
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedAbu Qair Semad: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Abu Qair Semad is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.8 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Tanta SC
DLDWD
Season result split
15% W53% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-18-11
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-9-6
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Abu Qair Semad
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W38% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-13-6
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Abu Qair Semad is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.18 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Abu Qair Semad is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.74 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Scoring profile ng Tanta SC: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

Scoring profile ng Abu Qair Semad: napakalakas

Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

27Goals scored (season)40
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
36Goals conceded (season)25
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1.85Average goals in match1.91
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal74%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
12%2 goals26%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
6%3 goals15%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3%4 goals3%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal53%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
21%2 goals15%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
6%3 goals6%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3%4 goals0%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
9%Scored in both halves18%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
80%BTTS - last 540%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Abu Qair Semad is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.47 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Tanta SC - half-time state
21% leading59% draw21% trailing
Abu Qair Semad - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.47
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.85Average goals (1st half)0.79
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
62%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
62%No goal before half-time53%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.44
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
1Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
50%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad
71%No goal after half-time59%
Tanta SCAbu Qair Semad

Tanta SC - second-half results

18% W44% R38% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Abu Qair Semad - second-half results

35% W38% R26% P
50
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Abu Qair Semad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Abu Qair Semad
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

1.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Abu Qair Semad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaAbu Qair Semad
Average goals in match 1.851.95 1.91
Both teams scored 53%41% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%32% 32%
Clean sheets 24%38% 47%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 65%67% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanta SC 0 - 0 - 1 Abu Qair Semad. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Abu Qair Semad
1 : 0
Tanta SC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?

Natapos ang Second Division match sa score na Tanta SC 1:1 Abu Qair Semad. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?

Tanta SC scores 0.79 goals per match at Abu Qair Semad 1.18. Ang Second Division average ay 1.95 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 32% ng matches. BTTS: Tanta SC 53%, Abu Qair Semad 41%.

Ano ang current form ng Tanta SC at Abu Qair Semad?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Tanta SC ay 1-3-1 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Abu Qair Semad ay 2-3-0 (1.80 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.