Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData updated noong July 21, 2026

TPS vs KuPS: match stats

TPS crest
TPS
1 : 2half-time 0:1
KuPS crest
KuPS

TPS vs KuPS: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

TPS vs KuPS sa Veikkausliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 17 June 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

TPS: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. KuPS: 4-1-0 at 2.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

TPS scores 1.25 at concedes 1.19 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.81 at concedes 0.94. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TPS 56%, KuPS 63%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, KuPS 44%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots at playing style

KuPS ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.88 vs 1.45. TPS averages 11.7 shots per match, habang KuPS ay 16.1.

First at second half

TPS leads at half-time sa 19% ng matches at scores 0.69 goals after the break. KuPS: 50% at 0.81.

Goals by minute

TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (10 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51% at Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Wala pang sapat na head-to-head sample para gawing pangunahing comparison.

Match description

Bet ko ang victory ng TPS dahil sa home form nila: 80% wins sa last five home games (sequence 'wwdww'), conceding only 0.4 goals per match at home with 60% clean sheets, kahit na average xG against nila sa home is 1.82. Ang hosts nagso-score ng average 1.4 goals sa home at may 0% goalless matches (palaging nakakagawa ng goal), habang si KuPS away averages 1.2 goals per match at hindi nakaka-score sa 20% ng away matches. Pero KuPS ang mas maraming chance creation: average 14 shots at 5 on target per away game at possession 62%, at ang kanilang away xG is 1.73 vs 1.13 xG ng TPS sa home. Sa practice, KuPS only converts 9% sa away matches at 0% clean sheets, samantalang TPS has 17% conversion rate sa home, which favors the hosts in terms of finishing quality and defense. Considering TPS 80% home wins vs KuPS 20% away wins and recent points averages 0.6 pts/match for TPS at 1.8 pts/match for KuPS, I assign 55% chance for home win, 30% draw, at 15% away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
TPSKuPS
11Shots15
TPSKuPS
5Shots on target5
TPSKuPS
1.59xG1.68
TPSKuPS
4Corners4
TPSKuPS
76Dangerous attacks54
TPSKuPS
10Fouls11
TPSKuPS
2Cards1
TPSKuPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.81
TPSKuPS
1.19Goals conceded / match0.94
TPSKuPS
47%Average possession58%
TPSKuPS
4.38Shots on target / match6
TPSKuPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match16.06
TPSKuPS
4.38Shots on target6
TPSKuPS
10.7%Shot conversion11.3%
TPSKuPS
47%Possession58%
TPSKuPS
1.45xG for1.88
TPSKuPS
1.59xG against1.14
TPSKuPS

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedKuPS: Dominant
TPSKuPS
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 86% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - TPS · 2.6 pts / match - KuPS

TPS
DWLWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
KuPS
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W38% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-1
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.15Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - TPS · 1.81 goals / match - KuPS

KuPS is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - TPS · 0.94 goals / match - KuPS

Scoring profile ng TPS: napakalakas

TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

Scoring profile ng KuPS: napakalakas

KuPS scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)29
TPSKuPS
19Goals conceded (season)15
TPSKuPS
2.44Average goals in match2.75
TPSKuPS
8Goals scored (last 5)13
TPSKuPS
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
TPSKuPS

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal88%
TPSKuPS
31%2 goals50%
TPSKuPS
13%3 goals31%
TPSKuPS
0%4 goals13%
TPSKuPS

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
TPSKuPS
38%2 goals19%
TPSKuPS
13%3 goals6%
TPSKuPS
0%4 goals0%
TPSKuPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
TPSKuPS
6%BTTS in both halves6%
TPSKuPS
25%Scored in both halves31%
TPSKuPS

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
TPSKuPS
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
TPSKuPS
60%BTTS - last 560%
TPSKuPS

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
TPSKuPS
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
TPSKuPS
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
TPSKuPS

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
TPSKuPS
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
TPSKuPS
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TPSKuPS

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - TPS · 1.81 pts / match - KuPS

TPS - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
KuPS - half-time state
50% leading31% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.81
TPSKuPS
0.56Goals scored (1st half)1
TPSKuPS
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
TPSKuPS
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.44
TPSKuPS
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
TPSKuPS
56%No goal before half-time38%
TPSKuPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.56
TPSKuPS
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
TPSKuPS
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
TPSKuPS
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.31
TPSKuPS
50%Clean sheet after half-time56%
TPSKuPS
38%No goal after half-time44%
TPSKuPS

TPS - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - second-half results

38% W44% R19% P
29
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.60
Goals scored / match1.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
10
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaKuPS
Average goals in match 2.442.67 2.75
Both teams scored 56%51% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%47% 44%
Clean sheets 31%28% 31%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng TPS vs KuPS?

Natapos ang Veikkausliiga match sa score na TPS 1:2 KuPS. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang TPS vs KuPS?

TPS scores 1.25 goals per match at KuPS 1.81. Ang Veikkausliiga average ay 2.67 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 47% ng matches. BTTS: TPS 56%, KuPS 63%.

Ano ang current form ng TPS at KuPS?

Sa last 5 matches, ang TPS ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang KuPS ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng TPS vs KuPS?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.