Tukums vs Riga: match stats
Tukums vs Riga: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Tukums vs Riga sa Virsliga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 20 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Tukums: 0-0-5 sa last five matches at 0.00 points per match. Riga: 4-1-0 at 2.60 points per match.
Goal statistics
Tukums scores 1.65 at concedes 2.04 goals per match. Riga scores 2.96 at concedes 0.87. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums 91%, Riga 57%. Over 2.5: Tukums 78%, Riga 83%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots at playing style
Riga ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 2.05 vs 1.42. Tukums averages 11.9 shots per match, habang Riga ay 17.3.
First at second half
Tukums leads at half-time sa 26% ng matches at scores 0.83 goals after the break. Riga: 70% at 1.43.
Goals by minute
Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Sa 6 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-2-4. Average goals: 2.83, BTTS: 33%.
Match description
Bet ko ang away sa guests (Riga) — season numbers nila ang nagpapakita ng edge: 9 wins, 3 draws at only 1 loss kumpara sa 2 wins, 7 draws at 4 losses ng Tukums. Riga sa away averages 3.43 goals with 14.86 shots at 6.71 shots on target, habang Tukums sa home has 2.43 goals with 11.14 shots at 5.29 SOT, so offensive advantage goes to the visitors. Guests have higher xG 1.87 vs 1.44 ng hosts at much higher possession (64% vs 44%), nagpapakita ng better game control at kalidad ng chances. Defensively Riga concedes 1.14 goals away with xG against 1.06, habang Tukums concedes 1.29 at home with xG against 1.54 — ibig sabihin Tinatawag na partly lucky si Tukums dahil lower opponent finishing, pero hindi enough para offset Riga’s advantage. Kahit na Tukums scored 16 goals sa last 5 matches vs 13 ng Riga, Riga has clearly better points form (2.2 points per game vs 1.6) at 71% away win efficiency, kaya mas malaki ang probability na panalo ang guests.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums | Riga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Tukums · 2.96 goals / match - Riga
Riga is 134% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.04 goals / match - Tukums · 0.87 goals / match - Riga
Tukums scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tukums
Over / Under — Riga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 104% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Tukums · 2.22 pts / match - Riga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Tukums
Riga
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums | Liga | Riga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.70 | 2.98 | ▲ 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 91% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 55% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 24% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▲ 91% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Tukums 0 - 2 - 4 Riga. Average goals 2.83, both teams scored in 33% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Tukums vs Riga?
Natapos ang Virsliga match sa score na Tukums 1:3 Riga. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Tukums at Riga?
Sa huling 6 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Tukums ng 0, ang Riga ng 4, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 2.83; BTTS: 33%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Tukums vs Riga?
Tukums scores 1.65 goals per match at Riga 2.96. Ang Virsliga average ay 2.98 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Tukums 91%, Riga 57%.
Ano ang current form ng Tukums at Riga?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Tukums ay 0-0-5 (0.00 points per match), habang ang Riga ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Tukums vs Riga?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.