URA vs Kitara: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

URA vs Kitara sa Uganda Premier League (Uganda). Naka-schedule ang match sa 4 December 2025 at 18:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

URA: 1-4-0 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. Kitara: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 0.90 at concedes 0.97 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 at concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 40%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots at playing style

Kitara ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.65 vs 1.56. URA averages 11.0 shots per match, habang Kitara ay 11.3.

First at second half

URA leads at half-time sa 20% ng matches at scores 0.40 goals after the break. Kitara: 55% at 0.48.

Goals by minute

URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38% at Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
URAKitara
9Shots2
URAKitara
5Shots on target0
URAKitara
0xG0
URAKitara
10Corners2
URAKitara
0Dangerous attacks0
URAKitara
17Fouls13
URAKitara
0Cards0
URAKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.38
URAKitara
0.97Goals conceded / match0.72
URAKitara
51%Average possession46%
URAKitara
4.37Shots on target / match4.69
URAKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match11.31
URAKitara
4.37Shots on target4.69
URAKitara
8.2%Shot conversion12.2%
URAKitara
51%Possession46%
URAKitara
1.56xG for1.65
URAKitara
1.38xG against1.31
URAKitara

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedKitara: Counter-attacking
URAKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

URA is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - URA · 1 pts / match - Kitara

URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - URA · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - URA · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara

Scoring profile ng URA: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

Scoring profile ng Kitara: malakas

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)40
URAKitara
29Goals conceded (season)21
URAKitara
1.87Average goals in match2.1
URAKitara
7Goals scored (last 5)7
URAKitara
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
URAKitara

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal76%
URAKitara
17%2 goals41%
URAKitara
10%3 goals14%
URAKitara
3%4 goals7%
URAKitara

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal55%
URAKitara
27%2 goals14%
URAKitara
10%3 goals3%
URAKitara
0%4 goals0%
URAKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time10%
URAKitara
7%BTTS in both halves3%
URAKitara
13%Scored in both halves21%
URAKitara

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
URAKitara
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
URAKitara
60%BTTS - last 560%
URAKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
URAKitara
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
URAKitara
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
URAKitara

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
URAKitara
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
URAKitara
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
URAKitara

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - URA · 1.93 pts / match - Kitara

URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.93
URAKitara
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.9
URAKitara
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.34
URAKitara
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.24
URAKitara
60%Clean sheet before half-time76%
URAKitara
67%No goal before half-time38%
URAKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.21
URAKitara
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
URAKitara
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
URAKitara
0.93Average goals (2nd half)0.86
URAKitara
60%Clean sheet after half-time62%
URAKitara
70%No goal after half-time66%
URAKitara

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaKitara
Average goals in match 1.872.09 2.10
Both teams scored 40%38% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 31%
Clean sheets 40%39% 45%
Goal before half-time 57%59% 76%
Goal after half-time 60%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: URA 0 - 1 - 0 Kitara. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng URA vs Kitara?

Natapos ang Uganda Premier League match sa score na URA 0:1 Kitara. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang URA vs Kitara?

URA scores 0.90 goals per match at Kitara 1.38. Ang Uganda Premier League average ay 2.09 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 35% ng matches. BTTS: URA 40%, Kitara 38%.

Ano ang current form ng URA at Kitara?

Sa last 5 matches, ang URA ay 1-4-0 (1.40 points per match), habang ang Kitara ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng URA vs Kitara?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.