Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData updated noong July 23, 2026

Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match stats

Zamalek crest
Zamalek
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra sa Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). Naka-schedule ang match sa 20 May 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Zamalek: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Zamalek scores 1.50 at concedes 0.65 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 at concedes 0.81. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zamalek 38%, Ceramica Cleopatra 42%. Over 2.5: Zamalek 35%, Ceramica Cleopatra 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots at playing style

Zamalek ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.47 vs 1.19. Zamalek averages 13.3 shots per match, habang Ceramica Cleopatra ay 9.8.

First at second half

Zamalek leads at half-time sa 54% ng matches at scores 0.81 goals after the break. Ceramica Cleopatra: 35% at 0.77.

Goals by minute

Zamalek: 76-90+ (10 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47% at Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Zamalek ang favorite: sa home nila may average na 60% possession, 15.15 shots at 5.15 on target per match with xG 1.66, habang Ceramica away ay 56% possession, 8.75 shots at 3.33 on target with xG 1.09. Defensively mas solid ang hosts — Zamalek conceding lang 0.46 goals per home match at may 69% clean sheets sa home, samantalang guests concede 0.67 away at may 50% clean sheets. Sa short term, guests nakapuntos ng 5 goals sa last 5 matches at may average 1.2 points sa period na iyon, samantalang Zamalek scored 2 goals at may 1.4 points sa last 5, nagpapakita ng higher efficiency para sa hosts despite fewer chances. Season-wise Zamalek may 16 wins at 38 goals scored vs 17 conceded, habang Ceramica 12 wins at 34 goals scored vs 20 conceded; goal difference home ay +10 vs guests +6. Considering higher xG (1.66 vs 1.09), advantage sa shots at solid na defense sa home, forecast ko win for Zamalek at ina-assess ko probabilities na 60% home, 20% draw at 20% Ceramica win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

23Possession (%)77
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
5Shots9
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Shots on target5
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.72xG1.17
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1Corners4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
26Dangerous attacks32
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
10Fouls9
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
5Cards1
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.5Goals scored / match1.31
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.65Goals conceded / match0.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
53%Average possession57%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4.69Shots on target / match3.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.27Shots per match9.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4.69Shots on target3.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
11.3%Shot conversion13.3%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
53%Possession57%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.47xG for1.19
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.1xG against1.24
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Zamalek: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zamalek is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek
WDLWW
Season result split
65% W19% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-4
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zamalek is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Zamalek · 1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.65 goals / match - Zamalek · 0.81 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Scoring profile ng Zamalek: napakalakas

Zamalek scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Scoring profile ng Ceramica Cleopatra: mixed

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).

39Goals scored (season)34
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
17Goals conceded (season)21
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
2.15Average goals in match2.12
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals scored (last 5)4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal77%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
38%2 goals42%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
15%3 goals12%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%4 goals0%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal62%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
15%2 goals15%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4%3 goals4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4%BTTS in both halves8%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
27%Scored in both halves23%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS - last 540%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zamalek is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek - half-time state
54% leading38% draw8% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.5
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.54
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.88
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
81%Clean sheet before half-time69%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
42%No goal before half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.62
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.23
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
65%Clean sheet after half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
46%No goal after half-time42%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Zamalek - second-half results

46% W35% R19% P
52
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zamalek - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zamalek
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
5
6
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zamalek

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ZamalekLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 2.152.02 2.12
Both teams scored 38%47% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%34% 23%
Clean sheets 54%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 65%58% 58%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zamalek 1 - 0 - 0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Ceramica Cleopatra
0 : 2
Zamalek

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Natapos ang Egyptian Premier League match sa score na Zamalek 1:0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Zamalek scores 1.50 goals per match at Ceramica Cleopatra 1.31. Ang Egyptian Premier League average ay 2.02 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 34% ng matches. BTTS: Zamalek 38%, Ceramica Cleopatra 42%.

Ano ang current form ng Zamalek at Ceramica Cleopatra?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Zamalek ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang Ceramica Cleopatra ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.