Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 24 July 2026

76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Amed: match statistics

76 Iğdır Belediyespor crest
76 Iğdır Belediyespor
3 : 3half-time 2:2
Amed crest
Amed

76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

76 Iğdır Belediyespor play Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores 1.37 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 63%, Amed 55%. Over 2.5: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 53%, Amed 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.37. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 11.5 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.

Match halves

76 Iğdır Belediyespor: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68. Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16.

Goals by minute

76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 0-15 (14 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The favorite is Amed: they sit 3rd in the table and have 21 wins this season versus the hosts' 13, and 78 goals scored versus the hosts' 49, indicating a clear seasonal advantage. The visitors average 1.83 goals away with a conversion rate of 15%, while the hosts at home record 1.28 goals per match with a 10% conversion (1.83 vs 1.28; 15% vs 10%), so Amed is more efficient in finishing chances. The hosts have the edge in possession (60% vs 51%) and higher average home xG (1.55 vs opponents’ xG 1.44), yet they concede more goals over the season (51 vs 39) and their home goal difference is only +1 compared to Amed’s +8 on the road. In the last 5 matches both teams have 1 win, but Amed averages 1.2 points per match versus the hosts' 0.8 (1.2 vs 0.8), indicating greater consistency. Considering 21 vs 13 wins this season, superior efficiency 15% vs 10% and a +8 away goal differential, I predict an away win, with a significant probability of a draw due to 39% of the hosts' home games ending level.

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
7Shots9
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
3Shots on target4
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0.83xG1.05
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
3Corners4
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
23Dangerous attacks27
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
18Fouls10
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
8Cards1
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.37Goals scored / match2.13
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.42Goals conceded / match1.11
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
56%Average possession53%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
4.21Shots on target / match5.61
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.47Shots per match15.5
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
4.21Shots on target5.61
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
11.9%Shot conversion13.8%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
56%Possession53%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.37xG for1.71
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.2xG against1.15
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

Shooting quality

76 Iğdır Belediyespor: BalancedAmed: Attacking
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

76 Iğdır Belediyespor is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 0.8 pts / match - Amed

76 Iğdır Belediyespor
LWDLD
Season result split
34% W29% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-8-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 2.13 goals / match - Amed

Amed is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.42 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 1.11 goals / match - Amed

76 Iğdır Belediyespor scoring profile: strong

76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

52Goals scored (season)81
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
54Goals conceded (season)42
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
2.79Average goals in match3.24
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
11Goals scored (last 5)7
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal84%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
37%2 goals58%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
16%3 goals29%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
8%4 goals18%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal66%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
39%2 goals32%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
18%3 goals11%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0%4 goals3%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
76 Iğdır Belediyespor - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 38 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time26%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
8%BTTS in both halves11%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
29%Scored in both halves37%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
80%BTTS - last 580%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 1.71 pts / match - Amed

76 Iğdır Belediyespor - half-time state
26% leading50% draw24% trailing
Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.71
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.97
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.45
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
53%No goal before half-time42%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.71
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)1.16
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.79
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
39%Clean sheet after half-time53%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed
47%No goal after half-time37%
76 Iğdır BelediyesporAmed

76 Iğdır Belediyespor - second-half results

32% W32% R37% P
49
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

76 Iğdır Belediyespor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

76 Iğdır Belediyespor
ScoredConceded
14
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
8
12
31-45
10
13
46-60
5
9
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

76 Iğdır Belediyespor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
170%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

76 Iğdır BelediyesporLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.792.92 3.24
Both teams scored 63%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 58%
Clean sheets 16%29% 34%
Goal before half-time 71%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 3:3 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Amed?

76 Iğdır Belediyespor score 1.37 goals per game on average and Amed 2.13. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's matches and 55% of Amed's.

What form are 76 Iğdır Belediyespor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games 76 Iğdır Belediyespor have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Amed 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Amed?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.