Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueSkansi ArenaData current as of August 31, 2026

AB vs KÍ: match statistics

AB crest
AB
3 : 4half-time 1:2
KÍ crest

AB vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AB played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on August 17, 2026. Venue: Skansi Arena. Final score: 3:4.

Recent form

AB has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. KÍ has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

AB scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 1.56. KÍ scores 1.83 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of AB's games and 56% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 39%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.26 per game. AB takes 9.4 shots per game, while KÍ takes 15.6.

First-half and second-half trends

AB leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.78 after halftime.

When the teams score

AB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KÍ sit 2nd, while AB are sixth, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at just 2 defeats in 18 matches, with 33 goals scored and 14 conceded. KÍ remain unbeaten away from home, winning 44% of their matches and drawing 56%, while averaging 2.11 goals scored and conceding just 0.78—an emphatic contrast to the 1.67 goals AB concede at home. The visitors also create significantly more chances, averaging 18.67 shots, 7 shots on target and an xG of 2.24, compared with the hosts’ 10.22 shots, 4.44 shots on target and xG of 1.39. AB have a solid home record, winning 56% of their matches and scoring 2 goals per game, but they have lost 3 of their last five matches overall, while KÍ have conceded just 4 goals during that period. KÍ’s recent lack of attacking efficiency, with just 2 goals in five matches, increases the likelihood of a draw; however, the visitors’ superiority in game control, chance quality and defensive solidity gives them the greater probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is KÍ’s current form: in their last 5 matches, the team scored just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game, while BTTS occurred in 0% of cases. AB have also failed to impress offensively, scoring an average of 1.0 goal during this period, although they are conceding 1.4 goals per match. KÍ’s season-long data is considerably better, with the team averaging 2.11 goals and recording an xG of 2.24, but AB have a solid defense, conceding just 0.78 goals on average and keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches. AB’s BTTS rate for the entire season is only 44%, below the league average of 54%, while both teams kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is therefore more likely, primarily due to KÍ’s clear drop in finishing efficiency in their recent outings.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of chances, with both teams conceding an average of just 0.78 goals per game this season. In their last five matches, AB scored 5 goals, while KÍ managed only 2, with KÍ recording no games featuring at least three goals during that period. On a season-long basis, 89% of AB’s matches and 56% of KÍ’s matches finished with under 3.5 goals, providing clear support for a low goal ceiling. KÍ does create considerably more chances, averaging 18.67 shots and 7 on target per game compared with AB’s 12.44 and 3.33, respectively, but its current five-game average xG has dropped to 1.17. The projected total of 2.20 goals favors Under 3.5, as this selection requires four goals to lose, while the recent attacking form of both teams does not support such a high-scoring scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

AB make very strong starts to matches: they led at the break in 6 of their 9 games, scoring an average of 1.11 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.11. KÍ went into half-time level more often than ahead, doing so in 44% and 33% of matches respectively, while conceding an average of 0.67 goals in the first half. After the break, the pattern clearly reverses, as KÍ score an average of 1.11 goals, concede none on average, and win the second half in 56% of matches, whereas AB lose the second half in 56%. The visitors also have greater potential over the full match, as reflected by their xG of 2.24 compared with 1.58 and an average of 7.0 shots on target compared with the hosts’ 3.33. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT turnaround in which AB capitalise on their early advantage, but KÍ overturn the deficit and win after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
2 : 2
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
AB
10Shots13
AB
5Shots on target8
AB
1.47xG1.93
AB
9Corners9
AB
66Dangerous attacks74
AB
19Fouls10
AB
2Cards2
AB

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.39Goals scored / game1.83
AB
1.56Goals allowed / game0.78
AB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.39Shots per game15.56
AB
4Shots on target5.17
AB
14.8%Shot conversion11.8%
AB
51%Possession61%
AB
1.26xG for1.93
AB
1.69xG against1.06
AB

Shooting quality

AB: Efficient finishing: Dominant
AB
Accuracy (shots on target)43%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AB is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - AB · 1 pts / game - KÍ

AB
LWLLW
Season result split
39% W11% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-9
1.28 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
DLDWL
Season result split
50% W39% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-2
1.89 pts / game · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.39 goals / game - AB · 1.83 goals / game - KÍ

KÍ is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.56 goals / game - AB · 0.78 goals / game - KÍ

AB scoring profile: very strong

AB scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)33
AB
28Goals conceded (season)14
AB
2.94Average goals per game2.61
AB
5Goals scored (last 5)4
AB
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
AB

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal72%
AB
39%2 goals50%
AB
22%3 goals22%
AB
0%4 goals22%
AB

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal67%
AB
50%2 goals11%
AB
17%3 goals0%
AB
11%4 goals0%
AB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time17%
AB
6%BTTS in both halves0%
AB
33%Scored in both halves28%
AB

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AB
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AB
40%BTTS - last 520%
AB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

94%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
AB
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
AB
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
AB

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
AB
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
AB
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AB

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - AB · 1.83 pts / game - KÍ

AB - half-time state
44% leading17% draw39% trailing
KÍ - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.83
AB
0.78Goals scored (1st half)1.06
AB
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
AB
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.44
AB
44%Clean sheet before half-time67%
AB
39%No goal before half-time39%
AB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.5
AB
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
AB
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
AB
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.17
AB
39%Clean sheet after half-time61%
AB
50%No goal after half-time61%
AB

AB - second-half results

39% W17% R44% P
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KÍ - second-half results

39% W33% R28% P
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

AB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AB
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.89
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

ABLiga
Average goals per game 2.942.87 2.61
Both teams scored 56%55% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 39%
Clean sheets 22%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 94%71% 78%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.87
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ABYellow cardObule Sunday Moses
  2. Yellow cardRené Joensen
  3. ABYellow cardJimmy Abdul
  4. SubstitutionOn: Oussama AliOff: Mansour Sinyan
  5. SubstitutionOn: Jonn JohannesenOff: Filip Brattbakk
  6. SubstitutionOn: Deni PavlovićOff: Gilli Rólantsson
  7. SubstitutionOn: Dávid ReynheimOff: Páll Klettskard
  8. Yellow cardJonn Johannesen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from AB's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against . Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of AB vs KÍ?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished AB 3:4 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AB and KÍ?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches AB won 0, KÍ won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AB vs KÍ?

AB score 1.39 goals per game on average and KÍ 1.83. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of AB's matches and 56% of KÍ's.

What form are AB and KÍ in?

Over the last 5 games AB have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KÍ 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AB vs KÍ?

The statistical background for AB vs KÍ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.