AB vs KÍ: match statistics
AB vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AB played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on August 17, 2026. Venue: Skansi Arena. Final score: 3:4.
Recent form
AB has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. KÍ has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
AB scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 1.56. KÍ scores 1.83 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of AB's games and 56% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 39%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.26 per game. AB takes 9.4 shots per game, while KÍ takes 15.6.
First-half and second-half trends
AB leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
AB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KÍ sit 2nd, while AB are sixth, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at just 2 defeats in 18 matches, with 33 goals scored and 14 conceded. KÍ remain unbeaten away from home, winning 44% of their matches and drawing 56%, while averaging 2.11 goals scored and conceding just 0.78—an emphatic contrast to the 1.67 goals AB concede at home. The visitors also create significantly more chances, averaging 18.67 shots, 7 shots on target and an xG of 2.24, compared with the hosts’ 10.22 shots, 4.44 shots on target and xG of 1.39. AB have a solid home record, winning 56% of their matches and scoring 2 goals per game, but they have lost 3 of their last five matches overall, while KÍ have conceded just 4 goals during that period. KÍ’s recent lack of attacking efficiency, with just 2 goals in five matches, increases the likelihood of a draw; however, the visitors’ superiority in game control, chance quality and defensive solidity gives them the greater probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal is KÍ’s current form: in their last 5 matches, the team scored just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game, while BTTS occurred in 0% of cases. AB have also failed to impress offensively, scoring an average of 1.0 goal during this period, although they are conceding 1.4 goals per match. KÍ’s season-long data is considerably better, with the team averaging 2.11 goals and recording an xG of 2.24, but AB have a solid defense, conceding just 0.78 goals on average and keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches. AB’s BTTS rate for the entire season is only 44%, below the league average of 54%, while both teams kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is therefore more likely, primarily due to KÍ’s clear drop in finishing efficiency in their recent outings.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate number of chances, with both teams conceding an average of just 0.78 goals per game this season. In their last five matches, AB scored 5 goals, while KÍ managed only 2, with KÍ recording no games featuring at least three goals during that period. On a season-long basis, 89% of AB’s matches and 56% of KÍ’s matches finished with under 3.5 goals, providing clear support for a low goal ceiling. KÍ does create considerably more chances, averaging 18.67 shots and 7 on target per game compared with AB’s 12.44 and 3.33, respectively, but its current five-game average xG has dropped to 1.17. The projected total of 2.20 goals favors Under 3.5, as this selection requires four goals to lose, while the recent attacking form of both teams does not support such a high-scoring scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
AB make very strong starts to matches: they led at the break in 6 of their 9 games, scoring an average of 1.11 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.11. KÍ went into half-time level more often than ahead, doing so in 44% and 33% of matches respectively, while conceding an average of 0.67 goals in the first half. After the break, the pattern clearly reverses, as KÍ score an average of 1.11 goals, concede none on average, and win the second half in 56% of matches, whereas AB lose the second half in 56%. The visitors also have greater potential over the full match, as reflected by their xG of 2.24 compared with 1.58 and an average of 7.0 shots on target compared with the hosts’ 3.33. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT turnaround in which AB capitalise on their early advantage, but KÍ overturn the deficit and win after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AB | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AB is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - AB · 1 pts / game - KÍ
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KÍ is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.39 goals / game - AB · 1.83 goals / game - KÍ
KÍ is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.56 goals / game - AB · 0.78 goals / game - KÍ
AB scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
KÍ scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AB
Over / Under - KÍ
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KÍ is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - AB · 1.83 pts / game - KÍ
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KÍ - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AB
KÍ
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).
Teams vs league
| AB | Liga | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.94 | 2.87 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 94% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from AB's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against KÍ. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of AB vs KÍ?
The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished AB 3:4 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between AB and KÍ?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches AB won 0, KÍ won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before AB vs KÍ?
AB score 1.39 goals per game on average and KÍ 1.83. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of AB's matches and 56% of KÍ's.
What form are AB and KÍ in?
Over the last 5 games AB have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KÍ 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AB vs KÍ?
The statistical background for AB vs KÍ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


