Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of October 22, 2026

Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon

Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Hazm played against Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Al Hazm has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Al Taawon has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Hazm scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.20. Al Taawon scores 0.60 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Al Hazm's games and 40% of Al Taawon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Al Taawon has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.07 per game. Al Hazm takes 8.4 shots per game, while Al Taawon takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Hazm leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Al Taawon leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Hazm's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Al Taawon, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Professional League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Hazm have a slight edge, primarily due to Al Taawon's away form, with the visitors losing both of their matches so far and conceding an average of 2.5 goals. The hosts have also yet to win at home, but they have drawn 50% of those matches, while their defense allows an average of 1.39 xG compared with the 1.58 xG conceded by their opponents away from home. Al Taawon create more shooting opportunities on the road—9 per match compared with Al Hazm's 6.5—but they average only 2.5 shots on target and have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match. The hosts have slightly better form over their last five games, collecting 7 points and scoring 8 goals, while the visitors have picked up 5 points. Both teams have defensive issues, making a close contest likely; however, home advantage gives Al Hazm a greater chance of securing a narrow victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is primarily supported by Al Hazm’s recent matches: BTTS landed in 80% of them, with the team averaging 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Al Taawon have averaged 1.2 goals in their last five games, while Al Hazm have allowed opponents an xG of 1.40, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. The hosts create plenty of chances, averaging 19 shots and 4.5 shots on target per match, with a season xG of 1.98, while Al Taawon concede an average of 2.5 goals. The visitors’ defense has also recorded 0% clean sheets, making it more likely that Al Hazm will end their recent scoring drought and that both sides will get on the scoresheet. The risk is increased by the fact that Al Hazm have not yet scored a goal in the season data and have kept 100% clean sheets, but this sample clearly differs from their more recent form.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to at least two goals, as both teams went over the 2.5-goal line in 60% of their last five matches. During this period, Al Hazm averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Al Taawon scored 1.2 goals per game. The hosts create plenty of chances at home, recording 1.98 xG and averaging 19 shots, while the visitors concede as many as 2.5 goals per away match, with 1.58 xG allowed to their opponents. Al Hazm’s defense also offers no complete guarantee, having allowed opponents 1.40 xG in their last five appearances, while Al Taawon generated 1.64 xG. The projected total of 2.70 goals gives the Over 1.5 option an edge, although the 2.5 line remains considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is for Al Hazm to lead at the break and maintain their advantage to secure the win, as the hosts have won 40% of their last five matches, compared with 20% for Al Taawon. Al Hazm’s advantage is also evident in their attacking creation: their average xG stands at 1.98 versus 1.04 for their opponents, while the hosts average 19 shots and 4.5 on target, compared with 9 and 2.5 respectively for Al Taawon. In the first halves of their last five matches, Al Hazm averaged 1.0 goals, while Al Taawon managed just 0.4, with the visitors recording a -2 goal difference. Additionally, Al Taawon have conceded an average of 2.0 goals before half-time in their away matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of the hosts taking an early lead. A draw at half-time remains a relevant alternative, as the visitors were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches; however, Al Hazm’s superior attacking quality supports a home win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

29Possession (%)71
Al HazmAl Taawon
8Shots20
Al HazmAl Taawon
4Shots on target5
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.93xG2.2
Al HazmAl Taawon
4Corners9
Al HazmAl Taawon
20Dangerous attacks81
Al HazmAl Taawon
15Fouls10
Al HazmAl Taawon
2Cards1
Al HazmAl Taawon

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game0.6
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.2Goals allowed / game1
Al HazmAl Taawon
47%Average possession55%
Al HazmAl Taawon
2.8Shots on target / game3
Al HazmAl Taawon

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.4Shots per game13.8
Al HazmAl Taawon
2.8Shots on target3
Al HazmAl Taawon
11.9%Shot conversion4.3%
Al HazmAl Taawon
47%Possession55%
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.07xG for1.49
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.35xG against1.4
Al HazmAl Taawon

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedAl Taawon: Balanced
Al HazmAl Taawon
Accuracy (shots on target)33%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Hazm is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Al Hazm · 0.6 pts / game - Al Taawon

Al Hazm
WLLDD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Taawon
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W60% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hazm is 67% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Al Hazm · 0.6 goals / game - Al Taawon

Al Taawon is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - Al Hazm · 1 goals / game - Al Taawon

Al Hazm scoring profile: mixed

Al Hazm scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).

Al Taawon scoring profile: mixed

Al Taawon scores in 40% of games (2 of 5 games), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

5Goals scored (season)3
Al HazmAl Taawon
6Goals conceded (season)5
Al HazmAl Taawon
2.2Average goals per game1.6
Al HazmAl Taawon
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Al HazmAl Taawon
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Al HazmAl Taawon

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
40%2 goals20%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%3 goals0%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmAl Taawon

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
20%2 goals40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
20%3 goals20%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmAl Taawon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Al HazmAl Taawon
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HazmAl Taawon
20%Scored in both halves0%
Al HazmAl Taawon

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al HazmAl Taawon
60%BTTS - last 540%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Al HazmAl Taawon

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
Al HazmAl Taawon
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hazm is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Al Hazm · 0.8 pts / game - Al Taawon

Al Hazm - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Al Taawon - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.8
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.2Average goals (1st half)1
Al HazmAl Taawon
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Al HazmAl Taawon
60%No goal before half-time80%
Al HazmAl Taawon

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per game (2nd half)1.2
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
Al HazmAl Taawon
1Average goals (2nd half)0.6
Al HazmAl Taawon
40%Clean sheet after half-time80%
Al HazmAl Taawon
60%No goal after half-time80%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Al Hazm - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Al Taawon - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.6

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Al Hazm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Al Taawon - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.00.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
72%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.89
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaAl Taawon
Average goals per game▼ 2.202.63▼ 1.60
Both teams scored▲ 60%44%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%50%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%36%▲ 60%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%67%▼ 40%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%65%▼ 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / game
1.31
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al HazmGoalAboubacar Bah
  2. Al TaawonYellow cardSaif Rashad Mohamed
  3. Al HazmYellow cardAbdurahman Al Dakheel
  4. Al HazmYellow cardSultan Tanker
  5. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Abdullah Al-ShanqitiOff: Sofiane Bendebka
  6. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Aboubacar DiakiteOff: Afimico Pululu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Al Hazm's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Al Taawon. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Hazm and Al Taawon?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Hazm won 1, Al Taawon won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

Al Hazm score 1.00 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 0.60. The Professional League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Al Hazm's matches and 40% of Al Taawon's.

What form are Al Hazm and Al Taawon in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Taawon 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.