Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of September 06, 2026

APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: match statistics

APEA crest
APEA
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Ethnikos Latsion crest
Ethnikos Latsion

APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

APEA played against Ethnikos Latsion in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

APEA has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Ethnikos Latsion has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

APEA scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.32. Ethnikos Latsion scores 0.96 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 46% of APEA's games and 46% of Ethnikos Latsion's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 39%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

APEA has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.22 per game. APEA takes 7.2 shots per game, while Ethnikos Latsion takes 7.1.

First-half and second-half trends

APEA leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Ethnikos Latsion leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.46 after halftime.

When the teams score

APEA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Ethnikos Latsion, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

APEA holds a clear advantage on paper: the hosts have scored 36 goals this season and average 1.5 goals at home, while Ethnikos Latsion averages just 1.0 goal away and has 27 goals overall. Defensively APEA also performs better — they concede 1.43 goals on average in home matches, with an average xG against of 1.07, whereas the visitors concede 1.64 goals away and have xG against of 1.59, suggesting Ethnikos allows more high-quality chances. The quality of created chances is similar (attacking xG 1.33 for APEA vs 1.34 for Ethnikos), but the hosts are slightly more efficient in front of goal (conversion rate 12% vs 11%) and have a higher clean sheet percentage at home (36% vs 21%). The last 5 matches show comparable short-term form — both teams average 2 points per game and have 3 wins in five fixtures — however the season goal tally (36 vs 27) and APEA’s home goal difference (+1) give the hosts a stronger basis for victory. Considering the hosts’ superior defense and higher effectiveness in the opponent’s box, I forecast an APEA win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for APEA and 43% for Ethnikos Latsion, while the league BTTS level is 49%, yielding an overall near 50:50 scenario. Both sides concede frequently this season — APEA 1.50 and Ethnikos 1.64 per match — with xG against of 1.66 (APEA) vs 1.59 (Ethnikos), meaning both teams regularly allow opponent chances. Ethnikos is noticeably more attacking (10.17 shots and 4.75 on target with xG 1.34) than APEA (7.55 shots, 2.82 on target and xG 1.08), while APEA have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per match) and Ethnikos 7 (1.4), so both teams can find the net. The counterargument is the low recent BTTS frequency — 40% in the last 5 matches for both teams — and seasonal goals-per-game of 0.93 and 1.00 indicating moderate scoring efficiency. Considering the low clean sheet rates (14% APEA, 21% Ethnikos), higher away xG and shot volume, and seasonal BTTS near 49–50%, I recommend BTTS - Yes with a moderate lean.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate APEA will score about 1.34 goals and Ethnikos Latsion about 1.50 goals, giving a total of ~2.84 goals. The calculation is based on xG: home side 1.08 xG, away 1.34 xG, while average xG against is 1.66 for APEA and 1.59 for Ethnikos — the averages of those pairs produce the stated 1.34 and 1.50. Season-long stats show Over 1.5 goals occurs in 79% of matches for both teams (79% average), while Over 2.5 occurs only in 43% (APEA) and 36% (Ethnikos), i.e. roughly 40% combined. Ethnikos averages 4.75 shots on target versus APEA’s 2.82, and in the last 5 matches APEA scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) and conceded 4, Ethnikos scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 3 — these figures support a moderately higher probability of at least 2 goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommended), with Over 2.5 estimated at ~42% and Over 3.5 at ~21%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ethnikos Latsion has the edge in chance creation: xG 1.34 versus APEA's 1.08, averaging 10.17 shots and 4.75 shots on target compared to the hosts' 7.55 and 2.82, which increases the visitors' chances of winning after 90 minutes. Few goals are scored by half-time — APEA averages 0.43 goals in the first half, the visitors 0.57, and the first-half goals average is around 1.36–1.43, so a draw at the break is a realistic scenario. HT statistics are mixed: the hosts were behind at the break in 57% of matches, but in the last 5 games APEA led at the break in 60% of cases, therefore the model assigns ~36% probability to a half-time draw. The visitors' higher xG and SOT and their activity after the break (79% of the visitors' matches with >0.5 goals in the second half) lead me to select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at the break and visitors to win (X/2), to which I assign the largest single weight of 26%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
APEAEthnikos Latsion
11Shots9
APEAEthnikos Latsion
2Shots on target3
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.32xG1.11
APEAEthnikos Latsion
8Corners5
APEAEthnikos Latsion
67Dangerous attacks45
APEAEthnikos Latsion
-1Fouls-1
APEAEthnikos Latsion
-1Cards-1
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.29Goals scored / game0.96
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.32Goals allowed / game1.57
APEAEthnikos Latsion
36%Average possession38%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
3.25Shots on target / game2.96
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.18Shots per game7.14
APEAEthnikos Latsion
3.25Shots on target2.96
APEAEthnikos Latsion
17.9%Shot conversion13.5%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
36%Possession38%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.31xG for1.22
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.17xG against1.62
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Shooting quality

APEA: Counter-attackingEthnikos Latsion: Counter-attacking
APEAEthnikos Latsion
Accuracy (shots on target)45%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

APEA
WDLWW
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-12
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Ethnikos Latsion
WDWLW
Season result split
29% W21% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-14
1.07 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APEA is 34% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - APEA · 0.96 goals / game - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.32 goals / game - APEA · 1.57 goals / game - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA scoring profile: very strong

APEA scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Ethnikos Latsion keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 meczów).

Ethnikos Latsion scoring profile: strong

Ethnikos Latsion scores in 61% of games (17 of 28 meczów), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).

36Goals scored (season)27
APEAEthnikos Latsion
37Goals conceded (season)44
APEAEthnikos Latsion
2.61Average goals per game2.54
APEAEthnikos Latsion
9Goals scored (last 5)7
APEAEthnikos Latsion
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
APEAEthnikos Latsion

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal61%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
36%2 goals25%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
18%3 goals11%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
4%4 goals0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal82%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
36%2 goals46%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
21%3 goals21%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
4%4 goals7%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
Ethnikos Latsion - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 28 meczów
49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time18%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
7%BTTS in both halves0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
25%Scored in both halves14%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
40%BTTS - last 540%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

APEA is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / game - APEA · 1.04 pts / game - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA - half-time state
29% leading39% draw32% trailing
Ethnikos Latsion - half-time state
25% leading29% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1.04
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.5
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.39
APEAEthnikos Latsion
43%Clean sheet before half-time39%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
46%No goal before half-time61%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per game (2nd half)1.25
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.14
APEAEthnikos Latsion
57%Clean sheet after half-time50%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
57%No goal after half-time64%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

APEA - second-half results

32% W36% R32% P
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ethnikos Latsion - second-half results

32% W29% R39% P
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

APEA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ethnikos Latsion - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

APEA
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
10
16-30
5
7
31-45
7
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ethnikos Latsion
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
4
8
16-30
7
9
31-45
1
2
46-60
7
9
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

APEA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Ethnikos Latsion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.93
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

APEALigaEthnikos Latsion
Average goals per game 2.612.72 2.54
Both teams scored 46%49% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 39%
Clean sheets 29%30% 18%
Goal before half-time 86%72% 82%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Ajack Aling Deng⚽ 1
Constantinos Louvaris⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. APEAGoalAjack Aling Deng
  2. APEAGoalConstantinos Louvaris

Head-to-head

Record from APEA's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ethnikos Latsion. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

The Second Division match finished APEA 2:1 Ethnikos Latsion. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between APEA and Ethnikos Latsion?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches APEA won 2, Ethnikos Latsion won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

APEA score 1.29 goals per game on average and Ethnikos Latsion 0.96. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 46% of APEA's matches and 46% of Ethnikos Latsion's.

What form are APEA and Ethnikos Latsion in?

Over the last 5 games APEA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ethnikos Latsion 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

The statistical background for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.