Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of September 08, 2026

Auda vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
1 : 1half-time 0:1
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Auda vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Auda played against FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on June 13, 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Auda has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. FS Jelgava has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Auda scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. FS Jelgava scores 0.75 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Auda's games and 44% of FS Jelgava's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 38%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.23 per game. Auda takes 12.9 shots per game, while FS Jelgava takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Auda leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For FS Jelgava, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the favorite in this match: they sit 3rd in the table versus FS Jelgava's 7th, have 11 wins this season compared to the visitors' 3 wins, and have scored 32 goals versus 12 for their opponents. At home Auda averages 2.38 goals per game and registers 5.13 shots on target and 13.38 total shots with a conversion rate of 18%, while FS Jelgava away averages only 0.63 goals per game, 2.5 shots on target and a 7% conversion rate. Auda's average xG is 1.72 per home match versus Jelgava's xG 1.17 on the road, and they maintain 61% average possession, whereas Jelgava failed to score in 50% of away matches and concedes 1.75 goals on average away. Form also favors the hosts: in the last 5 matches Auda has 3 wins and averages 1.8 points per game, while Jelgava in their last five have not won once, have 4 draws and average 0.8 points per game. Considering the advantage in creating and converting chances (5.13 vs 2.5 shots on target, 18% vs 7% conversion) and greater control of the game (61% vs 42% possession), I tip the home win and assess chances at 65% for Auda, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I favor the “BTTS - Yes” scenario because despite low average goals scored (Auda 0.88, FS Jelgava 0.63), both teams consistently concede: Auda concedes 2.0 goals/match on average, Jelgava 1.75. On the xG level both sides create and concede chances — Auda xG_for 1.29 and xG_against 1.63, Jelgava xG_for 1.17 and xG_against 1.87 — indicating an exchange of scoring opportunities even if finishing is inefficient. In the last 5 fixtures BTTS occurred in 40% of Auda’s matches and 60% of Jelgava’s, while across the season Auda registers 50% BTTS with only 13% clean sheets, and Jelgava 38% BTTS with 25% clean sheets, which favors matches with goals at both ends. Additionally Auda averages 10.25 shots (3.5 on target) and Jelgava 9.25 (2.5 on target), with conversion rates of 9% and 7% — this shows chances are being created and with a bit of finishing both teams scoring is likely. Overall I assess BTTS at 58% versus 42% for No BTTS, because the xG advantage and high average goals conceded (2.0 and 1.75) outweigh the low season scoring averages.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-and-defensive model yields expected goals: Auda 1.58 (attacking xG 1.29 vs opponent conceding 1.87), FS Jelgava 1.40 (attacking xG 1.17 vs opponent conceding 1.63), total 2.98 goals. Both teams have 63% of their matches this season with over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 3.03 goals per game, which corroborates that a result close to 3.0 is realistic. Auda concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has only 13% clean sheets, Jelgava concedes 1.75 goals and has 25% clean sheets, so the defenses are vulnerable to goals. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I estimate Over 1.5 ~82%), while Over 2.5 is assessed at 58% and Over 3.5 at 28%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Form analysis shows Auda has a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches (3/5) and averages 1.8 points per game in that period, while FS Jelgava have not won any of their last 5 matches (0% wins) and drew 80% of them. A draw at the break is a common scenario — both teams record a draw at half-time in 38% of their outings, and the average goals by half-time in the last 5 matches are 1.6 for the home side and 0.8 for the visitors. Auda holds a slight quality edge (xG 1.29 versus 1.17 for Jelgava) and generates more shots on target (3.5 vs 2.5), which increases the home side’s chance to break the deadlock after the break. At the same time Auda concedes many goals (on average 2.0 conceded per game), so there is a risk that both teams will score — the home side have such matches in 50% of their appearances; nevertheless the form balance and superior offensive metrics indicate Auda is most likely to decide the match in the second half. Therefore I recommend a Half-Time draw and Auda to win Full-Time (X/1) as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

69Possession (%)31
AudaFS Jelgava
13Shots9
AudaFS Jelgava
6Shots on target4
AudaFS Jelgava
1.56xG1.15
AudaFS Jelgava
5Corners6
AudaFS Jelgava
44Dangerous attacks42
AudaFS Jelgava
18Fouls15
AudaFS Jelgava
3Cards3
AudaFS Jelgava

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game0.75
AudaFS Jelgava
1.25Goals allowed / game1.88
AudaFS Jelgava
59%Average possession43%
AudaFS Jelgava
4.69Shots on target / game3
AudaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.94Shots per game9.75
AudaFS Jelgava
4.69Shots on target3
AudaFS Jelgava
15.5%Shot conversion7.7%
AudaFS Jelgava
59%Possession43%
AudaFS Jelgava
1.61xG for1.23
AudaFS Jelgava
1.19xG against1.75
AudaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Auda: Efficient finishingFS Jelgava: Balanced
AudaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Auda · 0.8 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Auda
LLWWW
Season result split
69% W6% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-4
2.13 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
FS Jelgava
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
19% W38% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-7
0.94 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 167% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Auda · 0.75 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Auda is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Auda · 1.88 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 94% of games (15 of 16 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 56% of games (9 of 16 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)12
AudaFS Jelgava
20Goals conceded (season)30
AudaFS Jelgava
3.25Average goals per game2.63
AudaFS Jelgava
7Goals scored (last 5)4
AudaFS Jelgava
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal56%
AudaFS Jelgava
63%2 goals19%
AudaFS Jelgava
19%3 goals0%
AudaFS Jelgava
6%4 goals0%
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal81%
AudaFS Jelgava
31%2 goals31%
AudaFS Jelgava
19%3 goals25%
AudaFS Jelgava
6%4 goals19%
AudaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Scored in both halves6%
AudaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
AudaFS Jelgava
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
AudaFS Jelgava
40%BTTS - last 560%
AudaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
AudaFS Jelgava
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
AudaFS Jelgava
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / game - Auda · 1.31 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Auda - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)1.31
AudaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AudaFS Jelgava
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
AudaFS Jelgava
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.13
AudaFS Jelgava
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AudaFS Jelgava
25%No goal before half-time63%
AudaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per game (2nd half)0.81
AudaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
AudaFS Jelgava
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
AudaFS Jelgava
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.5
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
AudaFS Jelgava
31%No goal after half-time75%
AudaFS Jelgava

Auda - second-half results

38% W44% D19% L
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

19% W25% D56% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FS Jelgava - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
6
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals per game 3.253.05 2.63
Both teams scored 63%61% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%56% 38%
Clean sheets 31%20% 19%
Goal before half-time 88%77% 69%
Goal after half-time 88%86% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaYellow cardKader Kone
  2. FS JelgavaYellow cardTomas Rataj
  3. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Gļebs PatikaOff: Tomas Rataj
  4. FS JelgavaGoalAlans KangarsAssist: Glebs Žaleiko
  5. FS JelgavaYellow cardRihards Bečers
  6. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  7. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Emīls Kristers ŠmaukstelisOff: Gļebs Kačanovs
  8. AudaYellow cardJosé Mendieta
  9. AudaYellow cardBarthélémy Diedhiou
  10. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ousmane CamaraOff: José Mendieta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Auda's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against FS Jelgava. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Auda
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:1 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and FS Jelgava?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 3, FS Jelgava won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs FS Jelgava?

Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.75. The Virsliga average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Auda's matches and 44% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Auda and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FS Jelgava 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The statistical background for Auda vs FS Jelgava — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.