Banga vs Panevėžys: match statistics
Banga vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banga played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on September 3, 2026. Venue: Gargždų miesto stadionas. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Banga has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Panevėžys has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Banga scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 0.81. Panevėžys scores 0.96 and allows 1.62. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 37% of Banga's games and 50% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Banga has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.25 per game. Banga takes 12.4 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Banga leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Banga sit 4th, while Panevėžys are seventh, and the hosts also have a clearly stronger season record: 12 wins and a 38:22 goal difference compared with the visitors’ 7 wins and 23:42 record. At home, Banga average 1.73 goals per match, whereas Panevėžys score just 0.69 goals away and fail to find the net in as many as 54% of matches. The visitors’ defense is particularly vulnerable, conceding an average of 2.23 goals away from home, with clean sheets in only 15% of matches. Banga do not dominate in terms of chance quality, as their average xG stands at 1.31 compared with the opponents’ 1.13, but Panevėžys allow opponents an xG of 1.67. Recent form has not been one-sided, but Banga have scored 7 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 4 for Panevėžys, further strengthening the prediction of a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Banga regularly finds the net, having failed to score in only 17% of matches, while Panevėžys has kept a clean sheet in just 15% of games and concedes an average of 2.23 goals. However, the key argument against BTTS - Yes is the visitors’ attacking weakness: they score only 0.69 goals on average, have failed to score in 54% of matches, and their shot conversion rate is 7% compared with Banga’s 10%. Over the last five rounds, Panevėžys has averaged just 0.8 goals per game, with BTTS occurring in 40% of their matches, below the league average of 48%. Banga has recently conceded 1.6 goals per game, so a goal from the visitors is possible, but their low scoring potential and frequent No Goal outcomes do not provide a sufficiently strong signal for both teams to score. The more likely scenario is that the hosts find the net, while Panevėžys fails to respond.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Banga should have a clear offensive advantage: they average 1.36 xG and 4.25 shots on target per match, while Panevėžys concede as many as 2.23 goals away from home. However, the visitors score only 0.69 goals per game themselves and failed to score in 54% of their matches, limiting their contribution to a high-scoring game. In their last five league rounds, Panevėžys have not played a single match with at least three goals, although Banga recorded such a total in 60% of their games. The projected total of 2.40 goals points primarily to scorelines such as 1:0, 2:0, 2:1 or 1:1, rather than an open end-to-end contest. Therefore, the best option is Under 3.5 goals, further supported by the fact that Banga finished below this line in 92% of their matches this season.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Banga have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 50% of their matches, while Panevėžys have been behind at half-time in 54%. The home side concede just 0.50 goals per match before the break, whereas the visitors allow their opponents to score 1.15 goals during this period, which supports the expectation of an early Banga lead. Over the course of the season, Panevėžys have lost 77% of their matches and concede an average of 2.23 goals, while Banga score 1.17 goals per game with an xG of 1.36. After the interval, the visitors still look weak offensively, scoring only 0.23 goals on average while conceding 1.08, making a turnaround in the event of a deficit unlikely. The most logical scenario is therefore a Banga lead at half-time and victory maintained through to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Banga is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Banga · 1.4 pts / game - Panevėžys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banga is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Banga · 0.96 goals / game - Panevėžys
Banga is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.81 goals / game - Banga · 1.62 goals / game - Panevėžys
Banga scores in 63% of games (17 of 27 games), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 games).
Panevėžys scores in 65% of games (17 of 26 games), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banga
Over / Under - Panevėžys
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 31%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banga
Panevėžys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Banga | Liga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.22 | 2.63 | • 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 31% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 70% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Banga's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses against Panevėžys. Games average 1.83 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banga vs Panevėžys?
The A Lyga match finished Banga 0:3 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Panevėžys?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Banga won 0, Panevėžys won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Panevėžys?
Banga score 1.41 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.96. The A Lyga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Banga's matches and 50% of Panevėžys's.
What form are Banga and Panevėžys in?
Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Panevėžys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Panevėžys?
The statistical background for Banga vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.