Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics
Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banga played against TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on September 14, 2026. Venue: Gargždų miesto stadionas. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Banga has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. TransINVEST Vilnius has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Banga scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 0.89. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.61 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Banga's games and 61% of TransINVEST Vilnius's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 68%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Banga has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.40 per game. Banga takes 12.5 shots per game, while TransINVEST Vilnius takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Banga leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. TransINVEST Vilnius leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For TransINVEST Vilnius, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
TransINVEST Vilnius sit higher in the table, have won 13 matches this season compared with Banga’s 12, and boast a superior goal difference, scoring 45 goals and conceding 34. Away from home, the visitors win 50% of their matches and average 1.93 goals per game, while Banga average 1.46 goals per match at home and fail to score in 38% of their appearances. The Vilnius side also create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.39 compared with the hosts’ 1.35, but above all are considerably more clinical, converting 17% of their shots compared with Banga’s 12%. Across their last five matches, the visitors have scored 7 goals and conceded 6, whereas Banga have managed just 4 goals and conceded 9. TransINVEST’s away defense allows an average xG of 1.19, lower than Banga’s 1.36 at home, further supporting the case for an away win, although the hosts may benefit from home advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
TransINVEST Vilnius has recorded BTTS in 71% of matches, well above Banga’s 50% and the league average of 49%, which is the main argument for a Goal/Goal outcome. The visitors score an average of 1.93 goals per match, while Banga has conceded as many as 1.8 goals across its last five appearances, so the away side should create plenty of chances. However, Banga has scored just 0.8 goals per match over its last five rounds, limiting confidence in the pick, although its current xG stands at a solid 1.65. TransINVEST’s defense keeps a clean sheet in only 21% of matches and concedes an average of 1.36 goals, giving the hosts a realistic chance to respond. The BTTS - Yes scenario is marginally more likely, but Banga’s weaker recent finishing keeps the risk of a No Goal outcome for the hosts at a significant level.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
TransINVEST score an average of 1.93 goals per game this season, while Banga have conceded as many as 1.8 goals across their last five matches, clearly supporting at least two goals. The home side generate an average of 1.41 xG, compared with 1.39 xG for the visitors, meaning the combined attacking potential exceeds 2.8 expected goals. The 1.5 line has been covered in 71% of Banga’s matches and as many as 93% of TransINVEST’s, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 57% and 79% of cases, respectively. The visitors also average 4.57 shots on target per game compared with Banga’s 3.5 and convert 17% of their attempts, which is why Over 1.5 has the strongest statistical backing.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and a TransINVEST Vilnius win at full-time. Banga concede an average of just 0.29 goals before the break and keep a clean sheet in the first half in 79% of their matches, strongly supporting the expectation of a cautious, evenly balanced opening. At the same time, the hosts are in weaker form: over their last five matches, they have scored 0.8 goals per game, conceded 1.8, and won only once. TransINVEST score 1.93 goals per match this season compared with Banga’s 1.29, and also average 4.57 shots on target against 3.50 for their opponents. After the break, the visitors score an average of 1.07 goals, or 1.0 over their last five appearances, while Banga have conceded an average of 1.0 goal after half-time during this period. Therefore, the visitors’ advantage should become evident late in the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banga | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Banga · 1.4 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - Banga · 1.61 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius
Banga is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.89 goals / game - Banga · 1.21 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius
Banga scores in 61% of games (17 of 28 games), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 games).
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 86% of games (24 of 28 games), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banga
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - Banga · 1.64 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banga
TransINVEST Vilnius
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Banga | Liga | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.63 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 47% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 32% | • 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 69% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Banga's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against TransINVEST Vilnius. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The A Lyga match finished Banga 1:3 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banga and TransINVEST Vilnius?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Banga won 1, TransINVEST Vilnius won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
Banga score 1.36 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.61. The A Lyga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Banga's matches and 61% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.
What form are Banga and TransINVEST Vilnius in?
Over the last 5 games Banga have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The statistical background for Banga vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.