Basake Holy Stars vs Medeama: match statistics
Basake Holy Stars vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Basake Holy Stars played against Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Basake Holy Stars has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Medeama has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Basake Holy Stars scores 0.84 goals per game and allows 1.10. Medeama scores 1.42 and allows 0.71. Games in this league average 1.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 23% of Basake Holy Stars's games and 52% of Medeama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 45%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Medeama has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.01 per game. Basake Holy Stars takes 5.0 shots per game, while Medeama takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Basake Holy Stars leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.35 goals per game after halftime. Medeama leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.65 after halftime.
When the teams score
Basake Holy Stars's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Medeama, it is minutes 16-30 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.94 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Basake Holy Stars are very strong at home — 80% home wins, conceding 0.4 goals per game on average and 73% clean sheets, with a +16 goal difference in home matches. Offensively the hosts score 1.47 goals per home game with xG 1.22, 4.36 shots on target and a 16% conversion rate; Medeama away records 0.93 goals per game, xG 1.14, 3.23 shots on target and an 11% conversion. Medeama have had a strong overall season (15 wins, a 44-22 record and 10 goals in the last 5 matches, i.e. 2.0 average), but that edge is not as pronounced away from home. The visitors have only 27% away wins, 33% of away matches without scoring and an average away xG against of 1.35, which puts them at a disadvantage against Basake’s defense. Considering the hosts’ dominant defensive metrics and superior attacking efficiency at home, I predict a Basake Holy Stars win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics point to a higher probability of No Goal (BTTS - No): Basake at home concedes on average 0.56 goals per game and has 50% home matches with a clean sheet, while the league features as many as 83% matches with a clean sheet, which reduces BTTS likelihood. Medeama away has a seasonal BTTS of 53% and scored 10 goals in the last 5 away matches (2.0 avg), with the visitors’ last 5 away fixtures showing BTTS at 60%, so the away side can find the net. However, the hosts create more chances at home: Basake has xG 1.77, 6.46 shots on target and averages 1.88 goals scored at home, giving them control of the match. Considering Basake’s last 5 matches with only 20% BTTS and the hosts’ defensive edge (0.56 goals conceded at home, 50% clean sheets), I assign 60% to 'no' and 40% to 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives 1.56 xG for Basake and 0.96 xG for Medeama (total 2.52), clearly above 1.5 and slightly above 2.5. Basake averages 1.88 goals per match, has 6.46 shots on target and xG 1.77, while Medeama has 0.93 goals, 3.23 shots on target and xG 1.14 — this indicates the hosts’ attacking advantage. Seasonal over 1.5 rates are 81% for Basake and 60% for Medeama, therefore I assess over 1.5 at 78% (under 22%). For the 2.5 line seasonal values are 50% (Basake) and 40% (Medeama) and expected goals 2.52, so over 2.5 is only slightly favored (53% vs 47%). Over 3.5 is unlikely based on seasonal 19% and 7%, hence over 3.5 only 12% (under 88%), so I recommend playing over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Basake Holy Stars are clear favorites: the hosts have won 69% of matches this season, scoring on average 1.88 goals and conceding 0.56 per game, and they led at the break in 50% of fixtures with average first-half goals of 1.00 versus Medeama’s 0.53. Their xG is 1.77 against the visitors’ 1.14, and the hosts register an average of 6.46 shots on target versus Medeama’s 3.23, which confirms superiority in chance creation and favors maintaining a lead. However, form must be considered: in the last five matches Basake did not lead at the break (0% in the last 5), while Medeama had HT leads in 40% of that span, so I give weight to the visitors’ possibility of equalizing or mounting a turnaround. Overall I assess the most likely scenario as 1/1 with a 44% probability, followed by X/1 at 18% and X/X at 8%, and I assign smaller (single-digit percentage) chances to scenarios with the visitors leading at the break; the distribution reflects the hosts’ 50% HT leads and their 69% season win rate while accounting for the last five matches as a risk factor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Basake Holy Stars | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Medeama is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Basake Holy Stars · 2 pts / game - Medeama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 69% better for: goals scored per game.
0.84 goals / game - Basake Holy Stars · 1.42 goals / game - Medeama
Medeama is 55% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Basake Holy Stars · 0.71 goals / game - Medeama
Basake Holy Stars scores in 55% of games (17 of 31 meczów), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 meczów).
Medeama scores in 81% of games (25 of 31 meczów), while Basake Holy Stars keeps a clean sheet in 48% (15 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Basake Holy Stars
Over / Under - Medeama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Basake Holy Stars · 1.58 pts / game - Medeama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Basake Holy Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +7 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Basake Holy Stars
Medeama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Basake Holy Stars | Liga | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.94 | 1.94 | ▲ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 23% | 34% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 41% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Basake Holy Stars's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Medeama. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Basake Holy Stars vs Medeama?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Basake Holy Stars 0:1 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Basake Holy Stars vs Medeama?
Basake Holy Stars score 0.84 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.42. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 23% of Basake Holy Stars's matches and 52% of Medeama's.
What form are Basake Holy Stars and Medeama in?
Over the last 5 games Basake Holy Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Medeama 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Basake Holy Stars vs Medeama?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


