Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks: match statistics
Berekum Chelsea demonstrate a decisive advantage in home matches, achieving a 63% win rate and maintaining 50% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.13 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.63, resulting in a positive goal difference of +4. Gamba All Blacks present very poor away form with a 75% loss rate and only 25% wins on the road, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match. The recent form of the hosts in their last five home matches (lwlwwdww) shows stability, while the visitors in away matches have recorded a series (lllllwwl) dominated by losses. Higher xG figures (1.4 vs 1.12) and possession stats (52% vs 51%) further speak in favor of Berekum Chelsea, making them the favorite of this encounter.
Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Berekum Chelsea played against Gamba All Blacks in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Berekum Chelsea has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Gamba All Blacks has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Berekum Chelsea scores 0.78 goals per game and allows 1.17. Gamba All Blacks scores 1.06 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 1.86 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 39% of Berekum Chelsea's games and 39% of Gamba All Blacks's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 28%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 29% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gamba All Blacks has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.04 per game. Berekum Chelsea takes 2.9 shots per game, while Gamba All Blacks takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Berekum Chelsea leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Gamba All Blacks leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
Berekum Chelsea's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Gamba All Blacks, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.86 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 29% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Berekum Chelsea demonstrate a decisive advantage in home matches, achieving a 63% win rate and maintaining 50% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.13 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.63, resulting in a positive goal difference of +4. Gamba All Blacks present very poor away form with a 75% loss rate and only 25% wins on the road, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match. The recent form of the hosts in their last five home matches (lwlwwdww) shows stability, while the visitors in away matches have recorded a series (lllllwwl) dominated by losses. Higher xG figures (1.4 vs 1.12) and possession stats (52% vs 51%) further speak in favor of Berekum Chelsea, making them the favorite of this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Berekum Chelsea | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.36 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.88 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Gamba All Blacks is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.6 pts / game - Gamba All Blacks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gamba All Blacks is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
0.78 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.06 goals / game - Gamba All Blacks
Gamba All Blacks is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea · 0.94 goals / game - Gamba All Blacks
Berekum Chelsea scores in 56% of games (10 of 18 meczów), while Gamba All Blacks keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
Gamba All Blacks scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 meczów), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Berekum Chelsea
Over / Under - Gamba All Blacks
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gamba All Blacks is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.5 pts / game - Gamba All Blacks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Gamba All Blacks - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Berekum Chelsea
Gamba All Blacks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Berekum Chelsea | Liga | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.94 | 1.86 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▲ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 29% | • 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 42% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 60% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 60% | • 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Head-to-head
Record from Berekum Chelsea's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Gamba All Blacks. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Berekum Chelsea 0:0 Gamba All Blacks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks?
Berekum Chelsea score 0.78 goals per game on average and Gamba All Blacks 1.06. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Berekum Chelsea's matches and 39% of Gamba All Blacks's.
What form are Berekum Chelsea and Gamba All Blacks in?
Over the last 5 games Berekum Chelsea have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gamba All Blacks 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks?
The statistical background for Berekum Chelsea vs Gamba All Blacks — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.