Berekum Chelsea vs Vision: match statistics
Berekum Chelsea vs Vision: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Berekum Chelsea played against Vision in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: Golden City Park. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Berekum Chelsea has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Vision has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.33 points per game.
Scoring records
Berekum Chelsea scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 2.33. Vision scores 1.67 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.37 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Berekum Chelsea's games and 67% of Vision's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vision has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.12 per game. Berekum Chelsea takes 1.3 shots per game, while Vision takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Berekum Chelsea leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Vision leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Berekum Chelsea's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Vision, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 2.37 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Berekum Chelsea won their only home match so far 3:1, averaging 3 goals scored and just 1 conceded at home. Vision, on the other hand, lost their only away match 1:3, with opponents creating chances worth an average of 1.97 xG against them, compared with just 1.09 xG for the visitors. Both teams have been effective in their last five matches, scoring 9 goals each, but Vision have shown the more consistent defense over the course of the season, conceding 4 goals compared with Berekum Chelsea’s 7. The visitors sit higher in the table, in 8th place compared with the hosts’ 14th, but their poor away performance and Berekum Chelsea’s home advantage marginally tip the prediction in favor of the hosts. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Vision have suffered just one defeat and recorded one draw in their last five matches.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Berekum Chelsea average 2.0 goals at home, while Vision concede as many as 3.0 goals away, making a home goal highly probable. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in none of their away matches, and their away games ended with BTTS in 100% of cases. However, Vision score only 1.0 goal per match away from home, while Berekum Chelsea concede just 0.5 at home, which clearly reduces the confidence in an away goal. Recent form is more favorable for an exchange of goals: both teams scored 1.8 goals per game in their last five matches, while the hosts conceded 1.8 goals during that period. Berekum Chelsea's 60% BTTS rate in their last five fixtures, combined with Vision's highly vulnerable defense, provides a slight but sufficient signal for the "BTTS - Yes" / "Goal/Goal" option. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Berekum Chelsea score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Vision concede as many as 3.0 goals per away match, clearly supporting at least two goals in the game. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.8 goals scored, while Berekum Chelsea recorded 1.62 xG compared with Vision’s 1.31 xG. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 100% of both teams’ matches to date, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of the hosts’ last five matches and 60% of the visitors’ matches. Vision kept a clean sheet in 0% of their away matches, while the hosts average 5.5 shots on target compared with the visitors’ 3.0. The 2.75-goal projection offers the strongest edge on Over 1.5, although higher lines also have genuine support from the current form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Berekum Chelsea have very strong home data: they average 2.0 goals scored, concede just 0.5, and remain unbeaten, while Vision have lost every away match, conceding an average of 3.0 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in both of their home fixtures so far, scoring an average of 1.5 goals before half-time and conceding none; Vision were trailing at half-time in their away match, having allowed 3 goals. Chelsea’s superiority is also evident in chance creation, as they register 5.5 shots on target per match compared with the opponents’ 3.0, while their finishing efficiency stands at 20%, versus 11% for Vision. The visitors’ recent form is nevertheless better than their limited away sample, with 3 wins in 5 matches and a half-time lead in 80% of those games, so their success cannot be completely ruled out. Despite this, the combination of the hosts’ defensive strength and Vision’s very poor away defense most strongly supports the scenario of Berekum Chelsea leading at the break and securing the win at the final whistle — HT/FT 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Berekum Chelsea | Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -25% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.84 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vision is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.33 pts / game - Vision
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vision is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.67 goals / game - Vision
Vision is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea · 1.33 goals / game - Vision
Berekum Chelsea scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Vision scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Berekum Chelsea
Over / Under - Vision
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vision is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Berekum Chelsea · 2 pts / game - Vision
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Vision - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 0% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 0% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Berekum Chelsea
Vision
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Berekum Chelsea | Liga | Vision | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.67 | 2.37 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 52% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 52% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | • 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Berekum Chelsea's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Vision. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Berekum Chelsea vs Vision?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Berekum Chelsea 1:1 Vision. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Berekum Chelsea and Vision?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Berekum Chelsea won 1, Vision won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Berekum Chelsea vs Vision?
Berekum Chelsea score 1.33 goals per game on average and Vision 1.67. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.37 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Berekum Chelsea's matches and 67% of Vision's.
What form are Berekum Chelsea and Vision in?
Over the last 5 games Berekum Chelsea have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Vision 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Berekum Chelsea vs Vision?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


