Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 20 July 2026

BFC Daugavpils vs Auda: match statistics

BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Auda crest
Auda

BFC Daugavpils vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BFC Daugavpils play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 26 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 57%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 43%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.54. BFC Daugavpils: 12.7 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.

Match halves

BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 4-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 80%.

Match description

I predict an away win: Auda holds a clear advantage in efficiency and form — 9 wins this season versus BFC’s 5, 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus 6, and an average of 1.8 points per game in the last five fixtures compared to the hosts’ 0.8. The visitors score 1.71 goals per away match with a 14% conversion rate, while the home side average only 1.13 goals per match and a 9% conversion, despite slightly more on-target shots (4.88 vs 4.29). Quality-of-chances analysis shows similar xG (BFC home xG 1.56 vs Auda away xG 1.49), but BFC concedes higher xG against (1.52 vs 1.10), indicating greater defensive vulnerability for the hosts. Auda also has higher average possession (56% vs 50%) and have not had a goalless away game (0% of away matches without a goal vs 38% for BFC), so they are more likely to create and finish chances. Considering the edge in goals, finishing efficiency and superior recent form, I assign 60% to the away win, 25% to the draw and 15% to the home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
9Shots13
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
2Shots on target4
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
1.1xG1.61
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
5Corners1
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
53Dangerous attacks70
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
16Fouls15
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
2Cards2
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.68
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
1.26Goals conceded / match1.18
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
47%Average possession60%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
4.78Shots on target / match4.68
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.74Shots per match13.23
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
4.78Shots on target4.68
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
9.9%Shot conversion12.7%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
47%Possession60%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
1.54xG for1.63
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
1.61xG against1.13
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

Shooting quality

BFC Daugavpils: BalancedAuda: Balanced
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BFC Daugavpils is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1 pts / match - Auda

BFC Daugavpils
WDLWW
Season result split
35% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Auda
LWDLD
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.68 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.18 goals / match - Auda

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

29Goals scored (season)37
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
29Goals conceded (season)26
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
2.52Average goals in match2.86
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
9Goals scored (last 5)4
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal86%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
30%2 goals50%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
17%3 goals14%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
4%4 goals5%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal68%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
26%2 goals32%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
17%3 goals14%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
9%4 goals5%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time27%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
22%Scored in both halves36%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
40%BTTS - last 540%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.45 pts / match - Auda

BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing
Auda - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.45
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.77
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.41
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
74%Clean sheet before half-time55%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
70%No goal before half-time41%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.55
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.45
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
30%Clean sheet after half-time55%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda
35%No goal after half-time36%
BFC DaugavpilsAuda

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W48% R30% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
13
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

BFC DaugavpilsLigaAuda
Average goals in match 2.523.01 2.86
Both teams scored 57%57% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%56% 55%
Clean sheets 26%23% 32%
Goal before half-time 52%76% 77%
Goal after half-time 87%85% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): BFC Daugavpils 4 - 1 - 0 Auda. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.

FK Auda Riga
2 : 3
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
FK Auda Riga
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 1
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 0:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Auda?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 4, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Auda?

BFC Daugavpils score 1.26 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 59% of Auda's.

What form are BFC Daugavpils and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Auda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for BFC Daugavpils vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.