BFC Daugavpils vs Tukums: match statistics
BFC Daugavpils vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
BFC Daugavpils played against Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
BFC Daugavpils has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Tukums has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
BFC Daugavpils scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.24. Tukums scores 1.60 and allows 1.96. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of BFC Daugavpils's games and 88% of Tukums's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 76%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
BFC Daugavpils has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.41 per game. BFC Daugavpils takes 12.9 shots per game, while Tukums takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.84 goals per game after halftime. Tukums leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
BFC Daugavpils's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). For Tukums, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
BFC Daugavpils come into this match in significantly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 games, scoring 12 goals in the process, while Tukums have suffered 4 defeats and scored just 5 goals. The key factor is the visitors’ weakness away from home, where they have failed to win a single match, lost 67% of their games and conceded an average of as many as 2.58 goals per match. Daugavpils have a 50% win rate at home and concede just 0.79 goals per game, giving them a significant advantage over Tukums, who have a -15 goal difference away from home. The hosts also create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.62 compared to 1.44 for their opponents, while they also average 5.07 shots on target per match against 4.25 for the visitors. Tukums are capable of scoring an average of 1.33 goals away from home, so a goal for the visitors is possible; however, the advantage in form and defensive strength points towards a Daugavpils victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Daugavpils has recorded BTTS in 85% of its matches this season, while Tukums has done so in as many as 92%, both significantly above the league average of 55%. The hosts score an average of 1.85 goals, while Tukums concedes 2.58 goals per match and has not kept a single clean sheet. Tukums scores an average of 1.33 goals, while the Daugavpils defense also gives opponents opportunities, as confirmed by an average xG against them of 1.71. In their last five matches, Daugavpils produced an xG of 2.04, while Tukums, despite its weaker run of form, still recorded BTTS in 80% of its games. The most likely scenario is therefore for both teams to score, especially as both sides frequently combine BTTS with at least three goals: 62% for Daugavpils and 75% for Tukums.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Daugavpils score an average of 1.85 goals per game, while Tukums concede as many as 2.58, clearly increasing the hosts’ potential to score more than two goals. In their last five matches, Daugavpils scored 12 goals, averaging 2.4 per game, whereas Tukums conceded 10 goals during this period, an average of 2.0. At least three goals were scored in 69% of Daugavpils’ matches and 83% of Tukums’ games, while in the last five matches of both teams, this percentage stood at 80%. An additional argument is the very high scoring consistency: over 1.5 goals landed in 92% of the hosts’ matches and in every Tukums game. The strongest pick remains Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.15 goals provides a substantial safety margin even if the visitors are less clinical.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is BFC Daugavpils leading at the break and securing a home win, as Tukums have been behind at half-time in 58% of their matches, conceding an average of 1.33 goals before the interval. Daugavpils are in clearly better recent form: across their last five matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals, won 60% of their games, and led at half-time in three of those five appearances. Their advantage should increase after the break, as the hosts score an average of 1.0 goals in second halves while conceding only 0.62, whereas Tukums concede as many as 1.25 goals per match after half-time. The visitors do have comparable average xG figures, 1.44 versus 1.39, but their conversion rate is only 11%, compared with Daugavpils' 16%, and they are yet to win a match this season. The high scoring rates of both teams—85% and 92% of matches featuring goals from both sides—increase the risk of a Tukums response, but do not alter the home advantage in the 1/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| BFC Daugavpils | Tukums | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
BFC Daugavpils is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils · 0.6 pts / game - Tukums
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tukums is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.24 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils · 1.6 goals / game - Tukums
BFC Daugavpils is 58% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.24 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils · 1.96 goals / game - Tukums
BFC Daugavpils scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 games), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 25 games).
Tukums scores in 92% of games (23 of 25 games), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
Over / Under - Tukums
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
BFC Daugavpils is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils · 1.04 pts / game - Tukums
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 16%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
BFC Daugavpils
Tukums
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| BFC Daugavpils | Liga | Tukums | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.48 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.56 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▲ 88% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 55% | ▲ 76% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 24% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 76% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 83% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from BFC Daugavpils's perspective: 2 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss against Tukums. Games average 1.83 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Tukums?
The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 2:0 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Tukums?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 2, Tukums won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Tukums?
BFC Daugavpils score 1.24 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.60. The Virsliga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 56% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 88% of Tukums's.
What form are BFC Daugavpils and Tukums in?
Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Tukums 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Tukums?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


