Cavalry FC vs Forge FC: match statistics
Cavalry FC vs Forge FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cavalry FC played against Forge FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Spruce Meadows. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Cavalry FC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Forge FC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Cavalry FC scores 1.94 goals per game and allows 0.56. Forge FC scores 1.53 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Cavalry FC's games and 40% of Forge FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 40%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Forge FC has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.60 per game. Cavalry FC takes 14.4 shots per game, while Forge FC takes 15.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Cavalry FC leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Forge FC leads at halftime in 27% and scores 1.13 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cavalry FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Forge FC, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Canadian Premier League games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry FC are unbeaten at home, winning 71% of such matches and averaging 2.43 goals per game, while Forge FC score 1.88 goals away from home. The hosts create slightly lower-quality chances than their opponents (xG 1.85 vs. 1.92), but they limit opposition more effectively: their average xG conceded stands at 0.99, compared with Forge’s 1.15. Cavalry’s defense concedes just 0.57 goals per match at home, while Forge, despite winning 75% of their away fixtures, have failed to score in 13% of matches on the road. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches—2 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat—but home advantage and Cavalry’s more effective attack give the hosts a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Cavalry FC’s defense: the hosts concede just 0.43 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 71% of their games. Their season BTTS rate is only 14%, significantly lower than Forge FC’s 63% and the league average of 63%. Forge possess considerable attacking strength, scoring an average of 1.88 goals with an xG of 1.92, so an away goal is a genuine threat; however, Cavalry allow opponents just 0.85 xG per match. The last five meetings between the two teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases, but with each side conceding only 0.8 goals on average, there remains a significant risk that one team will fail to score. A No Goal outcome for one of the teams is therefore slightly more likely, primarily due to the hosts’ exceptionally solid defense.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Cavalry concede an average of just 0.43 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 71% of their games, which significantly limits Forge’s attacking potential. However, Forge have strong chance-creation metrics, with an average xG of 1.92 and 5.75 shots on target per match, so the visitors should make a meaningful contribution to the projected total of 2.15 goals. The hosts score an average of 1.14 goals, while Forge’s defense allows just 0.75 goals per match, making a high-scoring performance from Cavalry difficult to expect. This season, 86% of Cavalry’s matches and 62% of Forge’s games have ended with a maximum of three goals, and neither team has allowed an opponent to score more than two goals in a single match. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, as even if Forge score, the hosts’ very solid defensive profile favors results such as 0:1, 1:1 or 1:0.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and after the final whistle, as Cavalry were level at the break in 57% of matches, compared with 63% for Forge. The hosts concede just 0.43 goals per match on average and have kept a clean sheet in 71% of games, which significantly limits Forge’s chances of capitalising on their high average of 1.88 goals scored. Forge have greater attacking potential, with an xG of 1.92 compared with Cavalry’s 1.61 and an average of 5.75 shots on target versus 4.57. However, Cavalry’s defense is particularly solid after the break, having yet to concede a goal in the second half. The teams’ last five matches produced identical figures of 40% draws and 1.6 points per game, further supporting the forecast of a closely contested encounter. The low average number of goals before half-time—0.57 in Cavalry matches and 0.75 in Forge matches—points to a cautious opening without a clear advantage for either side.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cavalry FC | Forge FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Forge FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Cavalry FC · 2 pts / game - Forge FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.94 goals / game - Cavalry FC · 1.53 goals / game - Forge FC
Cavalry FC is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.56 goals / game - Cavalry FC · 0.6 goals / game - Forge FC
Cavalry FC scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while Forge FC keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 games).
Forge FC scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 games), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
Over / Under - Forge FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - Cavalry FC · 1.4 pts / game - Forge FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Forge FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cavalry FC
Forge FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Cavalry FC | Liga | Forge FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.89 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 63% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 20% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cavalry FC's perspective: 2 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses against Forge FC. Games average 1.71 goals, and both teams scored in 43% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cavalry FC vs Forge FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Cavalry FC 2:1 Forge FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cavalry FC and Forge FC?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Cavalry FC won 2, Forge FC won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cavalry FC vs Forge FC?
Cavalry FC score 1.94 goals per game on average and Forge FC 1.53. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Cavalry FC's matches and 40% of Forge FC's.
What form are Cavalry FC and Forge FC in?
Over the last 5 games Cavalry FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Forge FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavalry FC vs Forge FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cavalry FC vs Forge FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


