El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónComplejo Deportivo Tierra de JuegoData current as of September 06, 2026

CD Platense vs Inter: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 3half-time 0:0
Inter crest
Inter

CD Platense vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Platense played against Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Complejo Deportivo Tierra de Juego. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

CD Platense has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Inter has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Platense scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Inter scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of CD Platense's games and 33% of Inter's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Inter has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.25 per game. CD Platense takes 7.2 shots per game, while Inter takes 8.0.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Platense leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Inter leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Platense's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Inter, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 4 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Platense are very strong at home: they have won both of their matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding just 0.5 per game. The hosts also create more danger in front of goal, averaging 8 shots on target from 11.5 attempts, while Inter average 4 shots on target away from home and score 1 goal per match. Inter remain unbeaten this season and have recorded 3 wins and 2 draws in their last five matches, but as many as 67% of their away games have ended in a draw. The teams’ xG figures are similar—1.81 for Platense and 1.84 for Inter—but the hosts’ superior efficiency and 100% home winning record slightly favor a home win (1).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, while their seasonal percentage of matches with both teams scoring is just 33% each. Platense concede only 0.33 goals per match on average, compared with 0.67 for Inter, limiting the opponent’s chances of clinical finishing. Their defenses have also looked solid in the last five matches, conceding an average of 0.8 and 0.6 goals respectively. Although Inter have created chances worth an average of 1.67 xG in their last five appearances, Platense have scored only 1.2 goals per match during this period, while the league records a BTTS rate of 44%. The more likely scenario is therefore that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projected 2.05 goals is below the league average of 2.41, primarily due to Platense’s very solid defense, which concedes an average of just 0.33 goals per match this season. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 1.2 goals and conceded 0.8, while Inter averaged 1.8 goals scored and conceded just 0.6, pointing to a tight match without a high volume of open chances. In both teams’ seasonal profiles, 67% of matches finished Under 2.5 goals, while 67% of each team’s matches also ended Under 3.5 goals. Inter posts a high average xG of 1.84, but Platense allows opponents an average xG of only 1.24, so the visitors’ attacking potential should be limited. The strongest selection is Under 3.5, as it takes at least four goals to lose this bet, and the defensive data and low frequency of higher-scoring results clearly do not support such an outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Platense were level at the break in 2 of their 3 matches, compared with 1 of 3 for Inter, while the hosts conceded an average of just 0.0 goals during this phase. Inter, however, are showing better current form: across their last five matches, they averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, winning 60% of their games, whereas Platense averaged 1.2 goals scored and won 40%. The visitors also have a higher attacking average xG, 1.84 versus 1.46, increasing their chances of deciding an evenly matched game after the break. Platense are dangerous late on, having scored 3 goals between the 76th and 90th minutes, but Inter have not lost any of their last five matches. The X/2 scenario best combines a cautious start with the visitors’ superior form and attacking potential in the later stages of the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 3
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
CD PlatenseInter
12Shots8
CD PlatenseInter
6Shots on target4
CD PlatenseInter
1.71xG1.43
CD PlatenseInter
3Corners5
CD PlatenseInter
74Dangerous attacks89
CD PlatenseInter
9Fouls10
CD PlatenseInter
0Cards0
CD PlatenseInter

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game1.5
CD PlatenseInter
1Goals allowed / game0.5
CD PlatenseInter
49%Average possession57%
CD PlatenseInter
4.33Shots on target / game3.83
CD PlatenseInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.17Shots per game8
CD PlatenseInter
4.33Shots on target3.83
CD PlatenseInter
18.6%Shot conversion18.8%
CD PlatenseInter
49%Possession57%
CD PlatenseInter
1.25xG for1.61
CD PlatenseInter
1.4xG against1.42
CD PlatenseInter

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingInter: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseInter
Accuracy (shots on target)60%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inter is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - CD Platense · 2.2 pts / game - Inter

CD Platense
DWWLD
Season result split
33% W50% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - CD Platense · 1.5 goals / game - Inter

Inter is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - CD Platense · 0.5 goals / game - Inter

CD Platense scoring profile: mixed

CD Platense scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 meczów).

Inter scoring profile: very strong

Inter scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)9
CD PlatenseInter
6Goals conceded (season)3
CD PlatenseInter
2.33Average goals per game2
CD PlatenseInter
7Goals scored (last 5)9
CD PlatenseInter
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
CD PlatenseInter

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
CD PlatenseInter
50%2 goals50%
CD PlatenseInter
0%3 goals17%
CD PlatenseInter
0%4 goals17%
CD PlatenseInter

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal33%
CD PlatenseInter
17%2 goals17%
CD PlatenseInter
0%3 goals0%
CD PlatenseInter
0%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time17%
CD PlatenseInter
17%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseInter
33%Scored in both halves33%
CD PlatenseInter

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
CD PlatenseInter
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CD PlatenseInter
60%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
CD PlatenseInter
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
CD PlatenseInter
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
CD PlatenseInter

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseInter
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
CD PlatenseInter
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
CD PlatenseInter

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - CD Platense · 1.5 pts / game - Inter

CD Platense - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Inter - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.5
CD PlatenseInter
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CD PlatenseInter
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
CD PlatenseInter
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.83
CD PlatenseInter
33%Clean sheet before half-time83%
CD PlatenseInter
50%No goal before half-time50%
CD PlatenseInter

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)2
CD PlatenseInter
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1
CD PlatenseInter
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
CD PlatenseInter
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.17
CD PlatenseInter
67%Clean sheet after half-time83%
CD PlatenseInter
33%No goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseInter

CD Platense - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Inter - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Inter
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaInter
Average goals per game 2.332.49 2.00
Both teams scored 67%49% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%41% 33%
Clean sheets 17%34% 67%
Goal before half-time 83%59% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%68% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defensive advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Emerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino⚽ 1
Jairo Mauricio Henriquez Ferrufino⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from CD Platense's perspective: 0 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses against Inter. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

CD Platense
0 : 0
Inter
Inter
0 : 0
CD Platense
CD Platense
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:3 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Inter?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Inter won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Inter?

CD Platense score 1.33 goals per game on average and Inter 1.50. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 67% of CD Platense's matches and 33% of Inter's.

What form are CD Platense and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Inter 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Inter?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Inter: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.