Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 22 July 2026

CD Trofense vs Varzim: match statistics

CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Varzim crest
Varzim

CD Trofense vs Varzim: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Trofense play Varzim in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Varzim: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Varzim scores 1.22 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Trofense 47%, Varzim 47%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 31%, Varzim 44%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Varzim has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.14. CD Trofense: 7.7 shots per match, Varzim: 9.8.

Match halves

CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41. Varzim: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Varzim: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I back the home win (1) because CD Trofense shows superior form and home metrics: over the last 5 matches they average 1.2 points (2 wins, 3 losses) while Varzim average 0.6 points (1 win, 4 losses). Offensively the hosts score 1.08 goals per home game with xG 1.23, whereas Varzim average 1.00 goals away with xG 1.04, indicating greater expected threat from Trofense. Defensively Trofense concedes 1.08 goals at home versus Varzim conceding 1.38 on the road; additionally the home goal difference is 0 compared to -5 for the visitors, which favors the hosts. Trofense also produce more shots (8.23 vs 7.46) and more shots on target (2.92 vs 2.54) and have higher possession (53% vs 47%), while the percentage of matches without scoring is lower for the hosts (38% vs 46%), increasing their likelihood to score. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 55% home win, 25% draw and 20% Varzim win, noting that both teams have a high loss rate (54% in home/away matches) so the result may be decided by a minimal margin.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
CD TrofenseVarzim
8Shots10
CD TrofenseVarzim
4Shots on target6
CD TrofenseVarzim
1.28xG1.57
CD TrofenseVarzim
4Corners4
CD TrofenseVarzim
68Dangerous attacks72
CD TrofenseVarzim
-1Fouls-1
CD TrofenseVarzim
3Cards4
CD TrofenseVarzim

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match1.22
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.97Goals conceded / match1.13
CD TrofenseVarzim
51%Average possession49%
CD TrofenseVarzim
3.19Shots on target / match3.72
CD TrofenseVarzim

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.72Shots per match9.81
CD TrofenseVarzim
3.19Shots on target3.72
CD TrofenseVarzim
12.1%Shot conversion12.4%
CD TrofenseVarzim
51%Possession49%
CD TrofenseVarzim
1.14xG for1.28
CD TrofenseVarzim
1.26xG against1.33
CD TrofenseVarzim

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedVarzim: Balanced
CD TrofenseVarzim
Accuracy (shots on target)41%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Varzim is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1 pts / match - Varzim

CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-8
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Varzim
WDLLD
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Varzim is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.22 goals / match - Varzim

CD Trofense is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.13 goals / match - Varzim

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Varzim scoring profile: strong

Varzim scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

30Goals scored (season)39
CD TrofenseVarzim
31Goals conceded (season)36
CD TrofenseVarzim
1.91Average goals in match2.34
CD TrofenseVarzim
1Goals scored (last 5)6
CD TrofenseVarzim
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD TrofenseVarzim

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal66%
CD TrofenseVarzim
22%2 goals41%
CD TrofenseVarzim
6%3 goals13%
CD TrofenseVarzim
6%4 goals3%
CD TrofenseVarzim

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
CD TrofenseVarzim
19%2 goals28%
CD TrofenseVarzim
3%3 goals9%
CD TrofenseVarzim
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseVarzim

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
CD TrofenseVarzim
3%BTTS in both halves9%
CD TrofenseVarzim
16%Scored in both halves28%
CD TrofenseVarzim

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
CD TrofenseVarzim
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CD TrofenseVarzim
20%BTTS - last 560%
CD TrofenseVarzim

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CD TrofenseVarzim
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
CD TrofenseVarzim
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CD TrofenseVarzim

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CD TrofenseVarzim
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
CD TrofenseVarzim
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
CD TrofenseVarzim

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.25 pts / match - Varzim

CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing
Varzim - half-time state
28% leading41% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.25
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.59
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
CD TrofenseVarzim
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.16
CD TrofenseVarzim
56%Clean sheet before half-time53%
CD TrofenseVarzim
59%No goal before half-time59%
CD TrofenseVarzim

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.31
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
CD TrofenseVarzim
0.88Average goals (2nd half)1.19
CD TrofenseVarzim
53%Clean sheet after half-time47%
CD TrofenseVarzim
69%No goal after half-time47%
CD TrofenseVarzim

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Varzim - second-half results

28% W47% R25% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Varzim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
7
12
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaVarzim
Average goals in match 1.912.23 2.34
Both teams scored 47%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%40% 44%
Clean sheets 25%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 66%66% 69%
Goal after half-time 63%74% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Trofense 2 - 0 - 1 Varzim. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Trofense vs Varzim?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 0:1 Varzim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Trofense and Varzim?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Trofense won 2, Varzim won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs Varzim?

CD Trofense score 0.94 goals per game on average and Varzim 1.22. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 47% of CD Trofense's matches and 47% of Varzim's.

What form are CD Trofense and Varzim in?

Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Varzim 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs Varzim?

The statistical background for CD Trofense vs Varzim — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.