Belgium - Pro LeagueJan BreydelstadionData current as of September 19, 2026

Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC: match statistics

Club Brugge crest
Club Brugge
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Royal Antwerp FC crest
Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Club Brugge played against Royal Antwerp FC in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Jan Breydelstadion. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Club Brugge has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Royal Antwerp FC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Club Brugge scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 0.40. Royal Antwerp FC scores 2.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 20% of Club Brugge's games and 60% of Royal Antwerp FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Royal Antwerp FC has the higher season xG average, 1.92 to 1.89 per game. Club Brugge takes 16.8 shots per game, while Royal Antwerp FC takes 16.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Club Brugge leads at halftime in 80% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Royal Antwerp FC leads at halftime in 20% and scores 1.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

Club Brugge's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Royal Antwerp FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Club Brugge sit 3rd and have won 4 of their 5 league matches, while Royal Antwerp have recorded just 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, leaving them in 10th place. The hosts have won both of their matches at home so far, averaging 2.0 goals per game and conceding none. Their advantage in chance creation is clear: their average xG stands at 1.97 compared with Antwerp’s 1.75, while opponents allow their rivals an xG of 1.84, versus just 0.95 for Club Brugge. Brugge also average more shots—17.5 per match compared with 15—as well as more shots on target, 6.0 versus 5.5. Antwerp have scored 10 goals in five rounds, but they have conceded just as many, and failed to score in half of their away matches. For that reason, the more solid Club Brugge are the favorites at home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is moderately strong, as Club Brugge average 2.33 goals at home, while Royal Antwerp score 1.50 goals away from home. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any home match, while Antwerp have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last 5 games. Their attacking potential is also supported by the latest xG figures: 1.85 for Brugge and 1.92 for Antwerp, along with an average of 7.0 and 5.5 shots on target per match, respectively. Caution is warranted because BTTS - Yes landed in only 40% of Brugge’s last five matches; however, Antwerp’s 60% rate and the hosts’ defensive weaknesses slightly favor the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Club Brugge create chances worth an average of 2.03 xG at home and register 17.33 shots per match, while Antwerp have conceded 2.0 goals per game in their last five matches. The visitors are also an attacking threat: their average over the last five matches stands at 2.0 goals scored and 1.92 xG, whereas Brugge allow an average of 1.43 xG. Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% of the hosts’ last five matches and in 80% of Antwerp’s games, supporting a forecast of 3.15 total goals. However, the strongest pick is Over 1.5, as Brugge have scored at least two goals in 100% of their home matches so far, and both teams possess clear goalscoring potential.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Club Brugge were leading at the break in 60% of games, while Antwerp achieved this in only 20% and went into half-time behind in as many as 40% of matches. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.0 goals before the break, compared with just 0.4 for their opponents, strengthening the scenario of Brugge holding the advantage in the first half. Over the full match, Brugge also have the better recent winning record, at 60% versus Antwerp’s 40%, as well as a higher average points return: 1.8 compared with 1.4. The hosts’ advantage is further supported by their chance creation: their average xG is 2.03, with 7.0 shots on target, compared with 1.75 xG and 5.5 shots on target for the visitors. Antwerp can be dangerous after the break, having averaged 1.6 goals in the second half across their last five appearances, but they also conceded 1.4 on average. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT scenario remains Club Brugge maintaining their lead through to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
23Shots17
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
9Shots on target5
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2.56xG1.74
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
9Corners4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
69Dangerous attacks45
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
6Fouls13
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
3Cards3
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.8Goals scored / game2
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.4Goals allowed / game2
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
66%Average possession50%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
5.4Shots on target / game6.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.8Shots per game16.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
5.4Shots on target6.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
10.7%Shot conversion12.2%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
66%Possession50%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.89xG for1.92
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.17xG against1.72
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Shooting quality

Club Brugge: DominantRoyal Antwerp FC: Attacking
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Club Brugge is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Club Brugge · 1.4 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge
WWWLW
Season result split
80% W0% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Royal Antwerp FC
WWDLL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Royal Antwerp FC is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.8 goals / game - Club Brugge · 2 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge is 400% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.4 goals / game - Club Brugge · 2 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

Royal Antwerp FC scoring profile: mixed

Royal Antwerp FC scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Club Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 games).

9Goals scored (season)10
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2Goals conceded (season)10
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2.2Average goals per game4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
9Goals scored (last 5)10
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2Goals conceded (last 5)10
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%2 goals60%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%3 goals40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%4 goals20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they concede at least...

20%1 goal80%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%2 goals40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%3 goals40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%4 goals40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

42%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%BTTS in both halves20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%Scored in both halves40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%BTTS - last 560%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Club Brugge is 160% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.6 pts / game - Club Brugge · 1 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge - half-time state
80% leading20% draw0% trailing
Royal Antwerp FC - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.6Points per game (1st half)1
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.2Average goals (1st half)1
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%No goal before half-time60%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per game (2nd half)1.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.6
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1Average goals (2nd half)3
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
80%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
60%No goal after half-time20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Club Brugge - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Royal Antwerp FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.03.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Club Brugge
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Royal Antwerp FC
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Club Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
29%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Royal Antwerp FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.2
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Club BruggeLigaRoyal Antwerp FC
Average goals per game 2.203.08 4.00
Both teams scored 20%42% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%64% 80%
Clean sheets 80%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 80%
Goal after half-time 60%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per game
42%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Club BruggeGoalHugo Vegard Vetlesen
  2. Club BruggeSubstitutionOn: Jorne SpileersOff: Hugo Thierry Siquet
  3. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardSemm Renders
  4. Club BruggeGoalHugo Vegard Vetlesen
  5. Club BruggeYellow cardJorne Spileers
  6. Club BruggeYellow cardRomeo Vermant
  7. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Carlos Daniel Mejia KlingerOff: Semm Renders
  8. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardMaxime Busi
  9. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardArthur Vermeeren
  10. Club BruggeGoalJan Virgili TenasAssist: Joaquin Seys
  11. Club BruggeYellow cardHugo Vegard Vetlesen
  12. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Luis NarhOff: Xander Dierckx

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Club Brugge's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Royal Antwerp FC. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Club Brugge KV
0 : 1
Royal Antwerp FC
Royal Antwerp FC
0 : 1
Club Brugge KV

FAQ

What was the result of Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The Pro League match finished Club Brugge 3:1 Royal Antwerp FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Club Brugge and Royal Antwerp FC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Club Brugge won 1, Royal Antwerp FC won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

Club Brugge score 1.80 goals per game on average and Royal Antwerp FC 2.00. The Pro League average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Club Brugge's matches and 60% of Royal Antwerp FC's.

What form are Club Brugge and Royal Antwerp FC in?

Over the last 5 games Club Brugge have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Royal Antwerp FC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.