CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CODM Meknès plays UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game is scheduled for October 17, 2026.
Recent form
CODM Meknès has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. UTS Rabat has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.
Scoring records
CODM Meknès scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. UTS Rabat scores 1.00 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of CODM Meknès's games and 33% of UTS Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CODM Meknès has the higher season xG average, 0.95 to 0.80 per game. CODM Meknès takes 5.0 shots per game, while UTS Rabat takes 5.3.
First-half and second-half trends
CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
CODM Meknès's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For UTS Rabat, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CODM Meknès | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.20 | 0.60 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTS Rabat is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.33 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 2.33 pts / game - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CODM Meknès is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - CODM Meknès · 1 goals / game - UTS Rabat
UTS Rabat is 203% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - CODM Meknès · 0.33 goals / game - UTS Rabat
CODM Meknès scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 games), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).
UTS Rabat scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTS Rabat is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 2.33 pts / game - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CODM Meknès
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CODM Meknès | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.64 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 48% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 32% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from CODM Meknès's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against UTS Rabat. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
When do CODM Meknès and UTS Rabat play?
CODM Meknès face UTS Rabat on October 17, 2026 in Botola Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between CODM Meknès and UTS Rabat?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches CODM Meknès won 0, UTS Rabat won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?
CODM Meknès score 2.00 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of CODM Meknès's matches and 33% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are CODM Meknès and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?
The statistical background for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.