Romania - Liga IIStadionul ConcordiaData current as of October 18, 2026

Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi: match statistics

Concordia Chiajna crest
Concordia Chiajna
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Afumaţi crest
Afumaţi

Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Concordia Chiajna played against Afumaţi in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Stadionul Concordia. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Concordia Chiajna has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Afumaţi has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Concordia Chiajna scores 2.20 goals per game and allows 1.60. Afumaţi scores 1.20 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of Concordia Chiajna's games and 80% of Afumaţi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 80%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Afumaţi has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.50 per game. Concordia Chiajna takes 12.2 shots per game, while Afumaţi takes 14.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Concordia Chiajna leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.40 goals per game after halftime. Afumaţi leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Concordia Chiajna's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Afumaţi, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Concordia Chiajna sit 4th, while Afumaţi are only 13th, and the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring as many as 15 goals in that run. During the same period, the visitors have scored just 6 goals, recording 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats. At home, Concordia average 12 shots, including 6 on target, compared with Afumaţi’s 10 attempts and 5.5 shots on target away from home. However, the hosts’ advantage is weakened by a defense that concedes an average of 2.5 goals per match at home, with an xG against of 1.68, meaning the visitors, who average 1.65 xG away, should create opportunities to score. Despite this defensive vulnerability, Concordia’s superior current form and their run of 4 wins in 5 matches point towards a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is positive, as Concordia have recorded BTTS in 67% of their matches and Afumaţi in as many as 100%, with neither team having kept a clean sheet so far. The hosts have averaged 3.0 goals scored and 1.8 conceded over their last 5 matches, with all 5 of their most recent fixtures ending in Goal/Goal outcomes. Afumaţi average 1.0 goal per match this season but create chances worth 1.65 xG, while their average xG has risen to 1.96 across their last 5 appearances. Concordia allow opponents 0.93 xG per match; however, their lack of clean sheets and 8 goals conceded in 6 fixtures increase the visitors’ chances of scoring. The risk to this pick is that only 40% of Afumaţi’s last five matches featured BTTS, but the combination of both teams’ defensive weaknesses and the hosts’ high attacking potential still favors the BTTS - Yes option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In both teams’ matches this season, at least 2 goals have been scored in 100% of cases, which strongly supports Over 1.5. Concordia averages 1.33 goals at home, but has raised that figure to 3.0 over the last 5 matches, while conceding 1.8 goals per game. Afumaţi averages 1.0 goals away from home and has failed to keep a clean sheet, just like the hosts, who also have 0% of matches without conceding. Their attacking potential is confirmed by the xG figures: 2.07 for Concordia and 1.65 for Afumaţi. Therefore, the baseline scenario is at least 2 goals, making Over 1.5 the strongest selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Concordia win at the final whistle, as Afumaţi were level at the break in 80% of their last five matches and scored just 0.2 goals per game in those first halves. Over the same period, Concordia recorded a higher first-half points tally, averaging 1.4 points per game compared with the opponent’s 0.8, but their average of 1.0 goal conceded before the break supports a cautious scenario without a clear advantage. After half-time, the hosts improve significantly: in their last five matches, they scored an average of 2.2 goals, won the second half in 80% of cases and did not lose any of those five second halves. Afumaţi, meanwhile, conceded an average of 2.0 goals after the break in their away data and have not won any away match overall, while Concordia won 67% of their home fixtures. The hosts’ advantage is also supported by an attacking xG of 2.07, with just 0.93 xG conceded in front of their own goal. Therefore, the most likely outcome is a Concordia win after a level first half: X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
7Shots11
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
3Shots on target5
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.14xG1.46
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
5Corners10
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
65Dangerous attacks57
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
11Fouls7
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0Cards0
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
2.2Goals scored / game1.2
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.6Goals allowed / game1.8
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
51%Average possession53%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
5Shots on target / game5.4
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.2Shots per game14.8
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
5Shots on target5.4
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
18%Shot conversion8.1%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
51%Possession53%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.5xG for1.91
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.6xG against0.96
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Shooting quality

Concordia Chiajna: Efficient finishingAfumaţi: Attacking
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Concordia Chiajna is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna · 1.4 pts / game - Afumaţi

Concordia Chiajna
WWWLW
Season result split
80% W0% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Afumaţi
WLLDW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Concordia Chiajna is 83% better for: goals scored per game.

2.2 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna · 1.2 goals / game - Afumaţi

Concordia Chiajna is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna · 1.8 goals / game - Afumaţi

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Afumaţi keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).

Afumaţi scoring profile: very strong

Afumaţi scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

11Goals scored (season)6
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
8Goals conceded (season)9
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
3.8Average goals per game3
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
11Goals scored (last 5)6
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
80%2 goals40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
40%3 goals0%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0%4 goals0%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
20%2 goals40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
20%3 goals40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
20%4 goals0%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
60%Scored in both halves20%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
80%BTTS - last 580%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Concordia Chiajna is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna · 1 pts / game - Afumaţi

Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Afumaţi - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)1
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.2
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
40%No goal before half-time60%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)1.4
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
2.2Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi
0%No goal after half-time40%
Concordia ChiajnaAfumaţi

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

60% W20% D20% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Afumaţi - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Concordia Chiajna - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Afumaţi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Afumaţi
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
128%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Afumaţi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.95
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Concordia ChiajnaLigaAfumaţi
Average goals per game▲ 3.802.66▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 80%57%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%54%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▼ 20%24%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%77%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%82%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Darius Falcusan⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Mamourou Sanogo⚽ 1
—Vlad Ghineț⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AfumaţiGoalMamourou Sanogo
  2. Concordia ChiajnaGoalDarius Falcusan
  3. AfumaţiGoalVlad Ghineț

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Concordia Chiajna's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Afumaţi. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Afumaţi
1 : 0
Concordia Chiajna
Afumaţi
1 : 2
Concordia Chiajna

FAQ

What was the result of Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi?

The Liga II match finished Concordia Chiajna 1:2 Afumaţi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Concordia Chiajna and Afumaţi?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Concordia Chiajna won 1, Afumaţi won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi?

Concordia Chiajna score 2.20 goals per game on average and Afumaţi 1.20. The Liga II average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Concordia Chiajna's matches and 80% of Afumaţi's.

What form are Concordia Chiajna and Afumaţi in?

Over the last 5 games Concordia Chiajna have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Afumaţi 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi?

The statistical background for Concordia Chiajna vs Afumaţi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.