Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos: match statistics
Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Correcaminos UAT played Tepatitlán de Morelos in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Olímpico Ing. Marte R. Gómez. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Correcaminos UAT: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Tepatitlán de Morelos: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Correcaminos UAT scores 3.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Tepatitlán de Morelos scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Correcaminos UAT 100%, Tepatitlán de Morelos 0%. Over 2.5: Correcaminos UAT 100%, Tepatitlán de Morelos 0%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Correcaminos UAT has higher xG: 2.10 vs 1.33. Correcaminos UAT: 19.0 shots per match, Tepatitlán de Morelos: 10.0.
Match halves
Correcaminos UAT: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00. Tepatitlán de Morelos: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Correcaminos UAT: 61-75 (2 goals). Tepatitlán de Morelos: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tepatitlán de Morelos has a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they collected 7 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), averaging 1.4 points per game, while Correcaminos UAT has not won any of their last five matches (0–1–4) and averages just 0.2 points per game. The biggest gap is in defense — the home side conceded 14 goals in their last 5 matches (2.8 per game), while the visitors conceded 6 goals (1.2 per game), which significantly increases the guests’ chances of winning. Offensively both teams are similar: the hosts scored 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4 per game) and the visitors 6 goals (1.2 per game), but the high number of goals conceded by the hosts diminishes the value of their offensive output. Lack of detailed data on shots on target and xG (values 0 in the provided stats) hampers evaluation of the quality of created chances, so I base the assessment mainly on goal and points balance from the last 5 matches. On that basis I back the away win — estimated probabilities: away 60%, draw 20%, home 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Short- and medium-term indicators favor BTTS - Yes: the home team has 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches (5/5), averaging 1.4 goals scored and conceding 2.8 per game, indicating significant defensive vulnerability (14 conceded in the last 5). The away team has 40% BTTS in their last 5, averaging 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded, with recent offensive xG of 1.41 versus xG against 1.12, giving them a real chance to score. Additionally, both sides generate similar chance volumes: offensive xG 1.5 for the home side and 1.41 for the visitors, and the home team averages 3 on-target shots and 10 shots per match, so an exchange of goals is likely. The only counter-signal is a high league clean sheet rate of 86% and season zeros in some fields, but short-term form (14 conceded by the home team vs 6 scored by the visitors in the last 5) outweighs that. Therefore I project BTTS "Yes" at 68% versus 32% for "No", because the combination of the home side's 100% BTTS and the visitors' 1.2 average goals scored in the last 5 provides a stronger signal for both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Correcaminos scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 1.4) and conceded 14 (avg 2.8), while Tepatitlán scored 6 in their last 5 (1.2) and conceded 6 (1.2). Average xG over the last 5 matches is 1.5 for Correcaminos and 1.41 for Tepatitlán, with average xG against of 1.64 (home) and 1.12 (away). Combining these xG values yields expected goals of 1.31 for the home side and 1.52 for the visitors, totaling 2.83 expected goals. Using this value, a Poisson distribution gives roughly a 77% probability for Over 1.5, about 54% for Over 2.5 and about 31% for Over 3.5; additionally the league averages 3.14 goals per game, and Correcaminos had 100% of matches with over 2.5 goals in their last 5 fixtures, which reinforces the Over signal. For these reasons the best pick is Over on the 1.5 line, which provides the strongest numerically justified signal (77% probability).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Correcaminos UAT have been trailing at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), with an average of 0.4 goals scored by half-time and 1.4 conceded. Their average xG is 1.33 versus 1.67 xG against; they generate on average 10 shots per game of which 3 are on target, but they have a conversion rate of 0.0, indicating poor finishing efficiency. Tepatitlán have a 40% win rate in their last 5 matches and score on average 1.2 goals per game; they were trailing at half-time in only 20% of cases and concede on average 0.4 goals before the break, so they are more stable at half-time than the hosts. The home side did not win any of these 5 matches (0% wins), and they concede on average 1 goal in the second half according to available data, which reduces the likelihood of a turnaround. Therefore the strongest signal is the away team leading at the break and winning at full-time (HT/FT 2/2) — I assign this scenario a 50% probability, with lower chances for draws or a home upset.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Correcaminos UAT | Tepatitlán de Morelos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tepatitlán de Morelos is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
3 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT · 1 goals / match - Tepatitlán de Morelos
Correcaminos UAT scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Tepatitlán de Morelos keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
Tepatitlán de Morelos scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Correcaminos UAT
Over / Under — Tepatitlán de Morelos
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Correcaminos UAT - second-half results
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tepatitlán de Morelos - second-half results
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Correcaminos UAT
Tepatitlán de Morelos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| Correcaminos UAT | Liga | Tepatitlán de Morelos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 6.00 | 3.00 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 38% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Correcaminos UAT 0 - 0 - 2 Tepatitlán de Morelos. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
The Ascenso MX match finished Correcaminos UAT 3:1 Tepatitlán de Morelos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Correcaminos UAT and Tepatitlán de Morelos?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Correcaminos UAT won 0, Tepatitlán de Morelos won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
Correcaminos UAT score 3.00 goals per game on average and Tepatitlán de Morelos 0.00. The Ascenso MX average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Correcaminos UAT's matches and 0% of Tepatitlán de Morelos's.
What form are Correcaminos UAT and Tepatitlán de Morelos in?
Over the last 5 games Correcaminos UAT have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Tepatitlán de Morelos 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
The statistical background for Correcaminos UAT vs Tepatitlán de Morelos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


