Cuiabá vs Athletic Club: match statistics
Cuiabá vs Athletic Club: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cuiabá played against Athletic Club in Serie B (Brazil). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Venue: Arena Pantanal. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Cuiabá has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Athletic Club has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Cuiabá scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 0.81. Athletic Club scores 1.19 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.30 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Cuiabá's games and 58% of Athletic Club's. The Over 2.5 rates are 19% and 35%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cuiabá has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.24 per game. Cuiabá takes 13.2 shots per game, while Athletic Club takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Cuiabá leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. Athletic Club leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.65 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cuiabá's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Athletic Club, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie B games average 2.30 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cuiabá remain unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points and conceding just 4 goals, while Athletic Club have lost 3 of their last 5 games and conceded 9 goals. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances: their average xG stands at 1.72 compared with just 0.96 for the visitors away from home, while their average shots on target ratio is 5.08 to 2.58. Cuiabá’s home defense concedes an average of only 0.69 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 46% of fixtures, whereas Athletic Club allow opponents an xG of 1.93 away from home. A draw remains a realistic scenario, as Cuiabá draw 54% of their home matches and Athletic Club draw 50% of their away games, but the hosts’ advantage in game control, with 53% possession compared with 40%, points towards a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is strengthened by current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 80% of Cuiabá’s games and 60% of Athletic Club’s. The hosts averaged 1.6 goals during this period, while Athletic averaged 1.4, with the visitors conceding as many as 1.8 goals per match. Cuiabá should create chances, as its xG across the last five fixtures stands at 1.61, while the opposition allowed opponents an xG of 2.06. Athletic has lower attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.11, but Cuiabá kept a clean sheet in only 31% of its season matches and its xG against is 1.45. Although the hosts’ season-long BTTS rate is only 46%, Athletic’s recent defensive struggles and the improved finishing of both teams slightly support a goal from each side—BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The season profile clearly limits the likelihood of a high-scoring game: Cuiabá’s matches finished below 3.5 goals in 92% of cases, compared with 83% for Athletic Club. Cuiabá average just 0.92 goals per match and have not scored more than once in any game this season, although the visitors’ weak defense, allowing an average of 1.93 xG, raises their projected total to 1.50 goals. The visitors average 0.96 xG in attack, while Cuiabá have conceded just 0.8 goals per match over their last five games and generated only 1.14 xG against their opponents. Athletic Club’s recent form includes 1.8 goals conceded per match, so a 2-3 goal total remains possible, but the four-goal threshold is too high given the seasonal Over 3.5 rates of just 8% and 17%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Cuiabá win, as the hosts have been level after 45 minutes in 46% of their matches, compared with as many as 50% for Athletic Club. Both teams tend to play very cautiously in the first half: Cuiabá average 0.46 goals scored during this period and Athletic 0.42, while the average total number of goals is only 0.85 and 0.75, respectively. After the break, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who have averaged 1.2 goals scored in the second half across their last five matches and conceded only 0.6, whereas Athletic conceded 1.4 goals during that period. Cuiabá are also in better recent form, collecting 2.2 points per match in their last five appearances compared with their opponents’ 1.2, without suffering a single defeat in that period. In addition, the hosts create more chances, with an average xG of 1.44 compared with Athletic’s 0.96, while the visitors allow opponents an xG of 1.93, further strengthening the case for a result being decided after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cuiabá | Athletic Club | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cuiabá is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Cuiabá · 1.2 pts / game - Athletic Club
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Club is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.19 goals / game - Athletic Club
Cuiabá is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.81 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.04 goals / game - Athletic Club
Cuiabá scores in 58% of games (15 of 26 games), while Athletic Club keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 games).
Athletic Club scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 games), while Cuiabá keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cuiabá
Over / Under - Athletic Club
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Athletic Club is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / game - Cuiabá · 1.5 pts / game - Athletic Club
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cuiabá - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Athletic Club - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cuiabá
Athletic Club
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Cuiabá | Liga | Athletic Club | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.69 | 2.30 | • 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 48% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 42% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 31% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 66% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cuiabá's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Athletic Club. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cuiabá vs Athletic Club?
The Serie B match finished Cuiabá 3:0 Athletic Club. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cuiabá and Athletic Club?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cuiabá won 2, Athletic Club won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cuiabá vs Athletic Club?
Cuiabá score 0.88 goals per game on average and Athletic Club 1.19. The Serie B average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Cuiabá's matches and 58% of Athletic Club's.
What form are Cuiabá and Athletic Club in?
Over the last 5 games Cuiabá have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Athletic Club 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cuiabá vs Athletic Club?
The statistical background for Cuiabá vs Athletic Club — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


