Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of October 15, 2026

Dayrout vs Masar: match statistics

Dayrout crest
Dayrout
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Masar crest
Masar

Dayrout vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Dayrout played against Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on May 7, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Dayrout has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Masar has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Dayrout scores 0.59 goals per game and allows 0.94. Masar scores 1.38 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 1.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 25% of Dayrout's games and 41% of Masar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 22% and 31%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Masar has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.18 per game. Dayrout takes 5.8 shots per game, while Masar takes 8.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Dayrout leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Masar leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.69 after halftime.

When the teams score

Dayrout's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Masar, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.93 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win ("2") because Masar holds a clear offensive advantage: 44 goals scored this season versus Dayrout’s 19, and an average of 1.75 goals away compared to Dayrout’s 0.63 at home. The visitors generate more high-quality opportunities — on average 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion rate away versus 3.67 on target and 6% for Dayrout — translating into superior finishing efficiency. Hosts, however, defend compactly at home: they concede only 0.44 goals per match and record a clean sheet in 63% of home games, while Masar concedes 0.69 away, which increases the likelihood of a low-scoring game or a draw. Additionally, Masar fail to score in only 6% of away matches, whereas Dayrout fail to score in 44% of their home games, so the probability that the visitors will break down the home defense is high. Considering goal difference (GD +17 away for Masar vs GD +3 for Dayrout) and slightly better xG (1.49 vs 1.44), I assess probabilities as: 60% away win, 25% draw, 15% home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assign a 35% probability to BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) and 65% to No BTTS, therefore I recommend 'No' as the pick. Masar averages 1.75 goals per game, registers 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion rate, so they are the more likely side to score; Dayrout averages 1.0 goal per game, 2.86 shots on target and an 8% conversion, which limits their scoring potential. Seasonal BTTS rate is 25% for Dayrout versus 56% for Masar, while the league averages 1.93 goals per match and has a high clean sheet rate of 76%, favoring a scenario where at least one team keeps a clean sheet. In the last 5 matches Dayrout has 60% BTTS and 1.4 goals per game, but their recent xG is only 0.41 per match with 7 goals scored, indicating overperformance and less sustainability of their finishing. Considering Masar’s solid defense (0.69 goals conceded per season) and Dayrout’s low and inconsistent offensive efficiency, the 'No' scenario appears statistically stronger.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculations based on xG and goal averages yield expected goals of 1.25 for Dayrout and 1.20 for Masar, totaling ≈2.45 goals — computed by averaging Dayrout xG 1.18 with xG against Masar 1.31 and Masar xG 1.49 with xG against Dayrout 0.91. Masar creates and finishes more chances: on average 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion versus Dayrout’s 2.86 shots on target and 8% conversion; this season Masar has 44 goals for and 27 against, Dayrout 19 for and 30 against. Season metrics show a moderate probability for Over 2.5 goals (about 31% for each team), but in the last 5 matches Dayrout had 60% of games Over 2.5 and 60% BTTS, which increases outcome variance. As a result the strongest signal is Over on the 1.5 line (I estimate ~84% chance for Over 1.5), while the 2.5 line is balanced (Over ≈46% / Under ≈54%) and 3.5 is clearly Under (Over ≈14% / Under ≈86%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Masar is the clear favorite: they average 2.31 points per match versus Dayrout’s 0.94 and have won 69% of games (vs 19% for the home side), which strongly supports an away victory. The visitors led at the break in 8 matches (57%) and average 0.93 goals by half-time compared to the hosts’ 0.44; additionally their xG of 1.49 (vs 1.18 for Dayrout) and 5.46 shots on target (vs 2.86) demonstrate an early attacking advantage. In the second half Masar often dominates – they won second halves in 56% of matches and score on average 0.93 goals while conceding only 0.36, increasing the likelihood of holding and extending a lead. Dayrout frequently go into half-time drawn (draw at half-time in 56% of home matches), so an X/2 scenario is also possible, but the strongest signal from the data points to 2/2 (HT/FT: lead at the break by the away team and away win by full-time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

35Possession (%)65
DayroutMasar
4Shots11
DayroutMasar
2Shots on target6
DayroutMasar
0xG0
DayroutMasar
-1Corners-1
DayroutMasar
0Dangerous attacks0
DayroutMasar
16Fouls8
DayroutMasar
0Cards0
DayroutMasar

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.59Goals scored / game1.38
DayroutMasar
0.94Goals allowed / game0.84
DayroutMasar
31%Average possession47%
DayroutMasar
1.84Shots on target / game3.31
DayroutMasar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.84Shots per game8.78
DayroutMasar
1.84Shots on target3.31
DayroutMasar
10.2%Shot conversion15.7%
DayroutMasar
31%Possession47%
DayroutMasar
1.18xG for1.32
DayroutMasar
1.17xG against1.09
DayroutMasar

Shooting quality

Dayrout: BalancedMasar: Counter-attacking
DayroutMasar
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Masar is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Dayrout · 1.4 pts / game - Masar

Dayrout
DLDDW
Season result split
22% W44% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-11
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Masar
LWLWD
Season result split
44% W31% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-8
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
11-4-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 134% better for: goals scored per game.

0.59 goals / game - Dayrout · 1.38 goals / game - Masar

Masar is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.94 goals / game - Dayrout · 0.84 goals / game - Masar

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 47% of games (15 of 32 games), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 games).

Masar scoring profile: mixed

Masar scores in 66% of games (21 of 32 games), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 50% (16 of 32 games).

19Goals scored (season)44
DayroutMasar
30Goals conceded (season)27
DayroutMasar
1.53Average goals per game2.22
DayroutMasar
7Goals scored (last 5)8
DayroutMasar
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
DayroutMasar

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal66%
DayroutMasar
9%2 goals38%
DayroutMasar
3%3 goals16%
DayroutMasar
0%4 goals13%
DayroutMasar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal63%
DayroutMasar
22%2 goals19%
DayroutMasar
9%3 goals3%
DayroutMasar
6%4 goals0%
DayroutMasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time19%
DayroutMasar
0%BTTS in both halves6%
DayroutMasar
6%Scored in both halves31%
DayroutMasar

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
DayroutMasar
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
DayroutMasar
60%BTTS - last 540%
DayroutMasar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
DayroutMasar
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
DayroutMasar
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
DayroutMasar

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
DayroutMasar
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
DayroutMasar
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
DayroutMasar

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / game - Dayrout · 1.63 pts / game - Masar

Dayrout - half-time state
9% leading69% draw22% trailing
Masar - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per game (1st half)1.63
DayroutMasar
0.16Goals scored (1st half)0.63
DayroutMasar
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
DayroutMasar
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.94
DayroutMasar
75%Clean sheet before half-time72%
DayroutMasar
84%No goal before half-time50%
DayroutMasar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per game (2nd half)1.28
DayroutMasar
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
DayroutMasar
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
DayroutMasar
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.19
DayroutMasar
69%Clean sheet after half-time53%
DayroutMasar
66%No goal after half-time59%
DayroutMasar

Dayrout - second-half results

28% W47% D25% L
31
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding244%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Masar - second-half results

31% W34% D34% L
52
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Dayrout - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Masar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Masar
ScoredConceded
10
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+220%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

DayroutLigaMasar
Average goals per game▼ 1.531.93▲ 2.22
Both teams scored▼ 25%41%• 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 22%32%• 31%
Clean sheets▲ 50%38%• 38%
Goal before half-time▼ 34%53%▲ 59%
Goal after half-time▼ 59%68%▲ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / game
0.92
Away goals / game
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Dayrout's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Masar. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Dayrout vs Masar?

The Second Division match finished Dayrout 2:0 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dayrout vs Masar?

Dayrout score 0.59 goals per game on average and Masar 1.38. The Second Division average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Dayrout's matches and 41% of Masar's.

What form are Dayrout and Masar in?

Over the last 5 games Dayrout have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Masar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dayrout vs Masar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.