FCSB vs Metaloglobus: match statistics
FCSB heavily dominates this matchup across all statistical metrics. The hosts boast an impressive advantage in ball possession (60% vs 45%), significantly better shooting efficiency, and noticeably higher xG values (2.01 vs 1.26 for the visitors). Metaloglobus displays a disastrous away form with a 0% win rate, 87% loss rate, and a -28 goal difference, failing to keep a single clean sheet on the road. The visitors' last 5 away matches resulted in a 5-game losing streak, further confirming their helplessness away from their home stadium. Despite an average home form (47% win rate), FCSB should comfortably defeat the weakest team in the standings, which concedes an average of 2.73 goals per away game. The difference in class and statistics clearly points to a confident home win.
FCSB vs Metaloglobus: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FCSB play Metaloglobus in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
FCSB: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Metaloglobus: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
FCSB scores 1.63 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Metaloglobus scores 0.90 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FCSB 56%, Metaloglobus 59%. Over 2.5: FCSB 54%, Metaloglobus 62%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
FCSB has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.26. FCSB: 17.7 shots per match, Metaloglobus: 10.4.
Match halves
FCSB: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.76. Metaloglobus: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.51.
Goals by minute
FCSB: 0-15 (13 goals). Metaloglobus: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
FCSB heavily dominates this matchup across all statistical metrics. The hosts boast an impressive advantage in ball possession (60% vs 45%), significantly better shooting efficiency, and noticeably higher xG values (2.01 vs 1.26 for the visitors). Metaloglobus displays a disastrous away form with a 0% win rate, 87% loss rate, and a -28 goal difference, failing to keep a single clean sheet on the road. The visitors' last 5 away matches resulted in a 5-game losing streak, further confirming their helplessness away from their home stadium. Despite an average home form (47% win rate), FCSB should comfortably defeat the weakest team in the standings, which concedes an average of 2.73 goals per away game. The difference in class and statistics clearly points to a confident home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FCSB is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - FCSB · 1.2 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 81% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - FCSB · 0.9 goals / match - Metaloglobus
FCSB is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - FCSB · 2.05 goals / match - Metaloglobus
FCSB scores in 78% of matches (32 of 41 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 10% (4 of 39 matches).
Metaloglobus scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 41 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — FCSB
Over / Under — Metaloglobus
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 148% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.66 pts / match - FCSB · 0.67 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FCSB
Metaloglobus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.93 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 46% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 28% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): FCSB 1 - 0 - 1 Metaloglobus. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 0:0 Metaloglobus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and Metaloglobus?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCSB won 1, Metaloglobus won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
FCSB score 1.63 goals per game on average and Metaloglobus 0.90. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FCSB's matches and 59% of Metaloglobus's.
What form are FCSB and Metaloglobus in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Metaloglobus 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCSB vs Metaloglobus: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.